Esta vez sícon la IA, nada será igual en la universidad

  1. Mariano FERNÁNDEZ ENGUITA 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Papeles de economía española

ISSN: 0210-9107

Año de publicación: 2024

Título del ejemplar: Desafíos y oportunidades para el futuro de la educación superior

Número: 180

Páginas: 21-37

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Papeles de economía española

Resumen

Higher education has long been living with the promise, or the threat, that (micro) computers, the internet, or now artificial intelligence, will change everything—whether to reinforce it, turn it upside down, or leave it by the wayside. If we are to learn from the past «to avoid repeating it», the lesson is clear: once again, technology will not deliver what it promises, especially not to this millennia- old institution, which is much older and more stable than the rest of the educational system. But there is something diferent: each new technological ecosystem that has enteret education since the advent of writing, including the printing press, has done so by multiplying access to information and the reach of communication, but always at the cost of more uniformity, rigidity, and one-sidedness. The paradigmatic example in this realm is the fiasco of mass media (film, radio, television...), but also, earlier, the enduring textbook and, later, the ephemeral computer-assisted learning. However, the fifth transformation of information and communication, the digital one, in which we are already immersed, brings two more things: the increasingly developed capacity for personalization and the emerging capacity, just beginning with generative AI, for interaction. In an institution that, unlike earlier educational stages, is free from the custodial function, this can and should bring substantial changes in the processes and relationships of learning and teaching, as well as in its organizational and even material architecture.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ARIÑO VILLARROYA, A. y LLOPIS, R. (2011). ¿Universidad sin clases?: Condiciones de vida de los estudiantes universitarios en España (Eurostudent IV). Secretaría General Técnica.
  • AULETTA, K. (2012). The New Yorker, 30, pp. 38-47.
  • BLASCHKE, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), pp. 56-71.
  • BRUNT, P. A. (1992). Studies in Greek history and thought. Oxford University Press.
  • CAREY, K. (2016). The end of college: Creating the future of learning and the university of everywhere. NY, Riverhard.
  • CARNEVALE, A. P., SCHMIDT, P. y STROHL, J. (2020). The merit myth: How our colleges favor the rich and divide America. The New Press.
  • CHRISTENSEN, C. M. y EYRING, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. Wiley.
  • CHRISTENSEN, C. M., HORN, M. B., CALDERA, L. y SOARES, L. (2011). Disrupting college: How disruptive innovation can deliver quality and affordability to postsecondary education. Innosight Institute.
  • CHRISTENSEN, C. M., HORN, M. B. y STAKER, H. (2013). Is K-12 Blended Learning Disruptive? An Introduction to the Theory of Hybrids. Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation.
  • COPE, B. y KALANTZIS, M. (2009). Ubiquitous learning. University of Illinois.
  • CRONIN, J. M. y HORTON, H. E. (2009). Will Higher Education Be the Next Bubble to Burst? Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(37).
  • CRUE (2020). La Universidad frente a la pandemia. Actuaciones de CRUE [sic] Universidades Españolas ante la COVID-19. Conferencia de Rectores y Rectoras de las Universidades Españolas. https://bit.ly/41S8zBq, acc. 2/2/24
  • DEDE, C., RICHARDS, J. y SAXBERG, B. (eds.) (2018). Jill Watson. Learning engineering for online education: Theoretical contexts and designbased examples. Routledge.
  • DOWNES, S. (2008). Introducing EduPunk. https://bit.ly/3S3z6Zk. Acceso 2/2/24.
  • DRUCKER, P. F. (1995). The age of social transformation. Centre Canadien de Gestion, Ottawa.
  • ESPELOSÍN, F. J. G. (2019). Aristóteles, Alejandro y la ‘politeia’ griega. Gerión, 37(2), pp. 343-362.
  • FERNÁNDEZ-ENGUITA, M. (2018). Más escuela y menos aula: la innovación en la perspectiva de un cambio de época. Ediciones Morata, S. L.
  • FERNÁNDEZ-ENGUITA, M. (2022). Que la pandèmia no us confongui. Observatori de l’educació local -Anuari 2022, pp. 18-23. Col·lecció Eines, Sèrie Educació 12. https://bit.ly/3O5IB86, acc. 2/2/24.
  • FRANK, R. H. (2016). Success and luck: Good fortune and the myth of meritocracy. Princeton University Press.
  • GHADIRI, K. (2014). Developing and Implementing Effective Instructional Strategems in STEM Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20282
  • GHADIRI, K., QAYOUMI, M. H., JUNN, E., HSU, P. y SUJITPARAPITAYA, S. (2013). The transformative potential of blended learning using MIT edX’s 6.002 x online MOOC content combined with student team-based learning in class. Environment, 8(14), pp. 14-29. https://bit.ly/4cIyMri, acc. 2/2/24.
  • GROOM, J. (2018). The Glass Bees. Bavatuesdays 25/5/08, https://bit.ly/47AxUkV. Acceso 2/2/24.
  • HASE, S. y KENYON, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. UltiBASE In-Site, dic., https://bit.ly/3A4dy2B. Acceso 2/2/24.
  • HAUSCHILDT, K., GWOSC, C., NETZ, N. y MISHRA, S. (2015). Social and Economic Conditions of Student Life in Europe: Synopsis of Indicators. Eurostudent V 2012-2015. Bertelsmann.
  • HERNÁNDEZ ARMENTEROS, J., PÉREZ GARCÍA, J. A., FURIÓ PÁRRAGA, B., HERNÁNDEZ CHICA, J. y SALINAS GONZÁLEZ, L. (2023). La universidad española en cifras, 2019/2020. CRUE, Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas.
  • HESS, A. (2017). Harvard Business School professor: Half of American colleges will be bankrupt in 10 to 15 years. CNBC, 15/11. https://cnb.cx/3xoTexa. Acceso. 2/2/24.
  • HODGES, C. B., MOORE, S., LOCKEE, B. B., TRUST, T. y BOND, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EduCause review. https://bit.ly/3B8Ia4q. Acceso 2/2/24.
  • HORN, M. (2018). Will half of all colleges really close in the next decade. Forbes, 13/12.
  • MARKOVITS, D. (2019). The meritocracy trap. Penguin UK.
  • MINISTERIO DE UNIVERSIDADES (2023). UNIV base. Estadística de Estudiantes. Número de estudiantes en las universidades españolas. https://bit.ly/437z2Mh. Acceso 2/2/24. https://bit.ly/4cI0N2e. Acceso 2/2/24.
  • MODIC, S. J. (1997). Peter Drucker: Seeing things as they really are. Forbes, 62, 2: 5. https://bit.ly/41L03Eq. Acceso 2/2/24.
  • OPATRNY, M., HAVRANEK, T., IRSOVA, Z. y SCASNY, M. (2023). Class Size and Student Achievement: A Modern Meta-Analysis. https://bit.ly/3J7bxcU. Acceso 2/2/24.
  • PAPPANO, L. (2012). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12).
  • PARDO KUKLINSKI, H. y COBO, C. (2022). Expandir la universidad más allá de la enseñanza remota de emergencia. Ideas hacia un modelo híbrido post-pandemia. OPENAIRE. https://bit.ly/3WYxD6b. Acceso 2/2/24.
  • PISCITELLI, A., GRUFFAT, C. y BINDER, I. (2012). Edupunk aplicado: Aprender para emprender. Fundación Telefónica.
  • POWELL, W.W. y DIMAGGIO, P. J. (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
  • RAMA, C. (2021). La nueva educación híbrida. UDUAL.
  • RIVARD, R. (2013). Measuring the MOOC dropout rate. Inside Higher Ed, 8.
  • SALEH, A. y SANDERS, H. (2014). The wolf in sheep’s clothing: The Matthew effect in online education. Revista Internacional de Sociología de la Educación, 3(1), pp. 26-50.
  • SANDEL, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the common good? UK: Penguin.
  • SHAH, D. (2023). 2022 Year in Review: The «New Normal» that Wasn’t. The Report, Class Central. https://bit.ly/3TOsihQ. Acceso 2/2/24.
  • SLAVIN, R. (1990). Class size and student achievement: Is smaller better? Contemporary Education, 62(1), p. 6.
  • SLAVIN, R. E. (1989). Class size and student achievement: Small effects of small classes. Educational Psychologist, 24(1), pp. 99-110.
  • SUPPES, P. (1966). The uses of computers in education. Scientific American, 215(3), pp. 206-223.
  • WEICK, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science quarterly, 21(1), pp.1-19.
  • WEISE, M. R. y CHRISTENSEN, C. M. (2014). Hire Education: Mastery, Modularization, and the Workforce Revolution. ERIC.
  • WOOD, P. W. (2011). The higher education bubble. Society, 48(3), pp. 208-212.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet