Extending the limits of paper recyclingimprovements along the paper value chain

  1. Blanco, A.
  2. R. Miranda
  3. Monte, M. C.
Revista:
Forest systems

ISSN: 2171-5068

Any de publicació: 2013

Volum: 22

Número: 3

Pàgines: 471-483

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.5424/FS/2013223-03677 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Altres publicacions en: Forest systems

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Blanco A, Negro C, Monte C, Fuente H, Tijero J. 2002. Overview of the two major deposit problems in recycling: slime and stickies. Part II: stickies problems in recycling. Prog.Pap.Recycl. 11, 26-37.
  • Blanco A, Negro C, Monte C, Fuente H, Tijero J. 2004. The challenges of sustainable papermaking. Environ. Sci. Technol.38, 414A-420A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es040654y PMid:15575262
  • Bobu E, Ciolacu F. 2008. Evaluation of neutral deinking methods in processing different printed papers. Cellulose Chem. Technol. 42, 403-412.
  • Bobu E, Iosip A, Ciolacu F. 2010. Potential benefits of recovered paper sorting by advanced technology. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 44, 461-471.
  • CEPI. 2003a. The European paper industry on the road to sustainable development. Brussels (Belgium).
  • CEPI. 2003b. Summary of the study on non-collectable and non-recyclable paper products. Brussels (Belgium).The European Paper industry on the road to Sustainable Development.
  • CEPI. 2006. Special Recycling 2005 Statistics. Brussels (Belgium).
  • CEPI. 2011. 2010 Annual Recycling Statistics. Brussels (Belgium). European Comission. 2011. Communication on tackling the challenges in commodity markets and on raw materials, COM(2011) 25 Final.
  • Delagoutte T. 2005. Management and control of stickies. Prog.Pap.Recycl. 15, 31-41.
  • Delozier G, Deng Y. 2003. Enhanced flotation deinking of 100% flexographic ONP using surfactant spray technique in the presence of siloxane-based defoamer. Prog.Pap.Recycl. 13, 5-11.
  • Emerson D. 2004.Single stream vs. source separated recycling. BioCycle 45, 22-25.
  • ERPC (European Recovered Paper Council).2009. Assessment of Print Product Recyclability - Deinkability Score - User's Manual. Brussels (Belgium).
  • EPRC (European Recovered Paper Council).2011a. European Declaration on Paper Recycling 2011-2015. Brussels (Belgium).
  • ERPC (European Recovered Paper Council).2011b. Assessment of printed product recyclability. Scorecard for the removabiity of adhesive applications. Brussels (Belgium).
  • Faul A. 2005. Quality aspects of recovered paper for deinking. Prog.Pap.Recycl. 15, 6-10.
  • Faul A. 2010. Quality requirements in graphic paper recycling. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 44, 451-460.
  • Faul AM, Putz HJ. 2009. Scoring deinkability. Prog.Pap.Recycl.18, 17-22. .
  • Guo J, Severtson SJ, Kroll, SM. 2004. Role of paper face stock properties in determining removal efficiencies of pressure-sensitive adhesive films from recycling operations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 1443-1450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie034192t
  • Guo J, Severtson SJ, Gwin, LE. 2007. Optimizing the monomer composition of acrylic water-based pressure-sensitive adhesives to minimize their impact on recycling operations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 2753-2759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie061610w
  • Hamann L. 2009. Stickies: definition, origin and characterization. Proceedings of 9th CTP/PTS Advanced Training Course in Deinking Technology, Grenoble (France), June 3-5.
  • Hanecker E, Faul A. 2007. Changes in the quality characteristics of recycled fibre pulps. Das Papier 1-2, 54-56.
  • Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Venditti, RA. 2006. Control of tacky deposits on paper machines: a review. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 21, 154-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2006-21-02-p154-171
  • Ibarra D, Monte MC, Blanco A, Martínez AT, Martínez MJ. 2012. Enzymatic deinking of secondary fibers: cellulolytic enzymes versus laccase-mediator system. J. Ind. Microbio. and Biotechnol. 39, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-011-0991-y PMid:21643708
  • ITENE (Research and Technology Centre of Packaging, Transport and Logistics). 2012. Environmental impacts of freighting paper for recycling to China. Valencia (Spain).
  • Levlin J-E, Read B, Grossmann H, Hooimeijer A, Ervasti I, Lozo B, et al., 2010. The Future of Paper Recycling in Europe: Opportunities and Limitations. COST Office. Available at: http://www.cost-e48.net/thebook.htm
  • Miranda R, Bobu E, Grossmann H, Stawicki B, Blanco A. 2010. Factors influencing a higher use of recovered paper in the European paper industry. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 44, 419-430.
  • Miranda R, Blanco A. 2010. Environmental awareness and paper recycling. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 44, 431-449.
  • Miranda R, Monte MC, Blanco A. 2011. Impact of increased collection rates and the use of commingled collection systems on the quality of recovered paper. Part 1: Increased collection rates. Waste Manage. 31, 2208-2216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.06.006 PMid:21752622
  • Miranda R, Monte MC, Blanco A. 2013. Analysis of the quality of the recovered paper from commingled collection systems. Res. Cons. Recycl. 72, 60-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.007
  • Monte MC, Fuente E, Blanco A, Negro, C. 2009. Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste Manage. 29, 293-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.002 PMid:18406123
  • Nowak MJ, Severtson SJ, Wang XP, Kroll, MS. 2003. Properties controlling the impact of styrenic block copolymer based pressure-sensitive adhesives on paper recycling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42, 1681-1687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie0208974
  • Oldack RC, Gustafson FJ. 2005. Initiative to promote environmentally benign adhesives (IPEBA): solving a sticky issue. Prog. Pap. Recycl. 14, 6-8.
  • OJ. 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union L 312 22/11/2008, pp. 3-30.
  • Putz HJ. 2007. Recyclability of paper and board products. Int. Papwirtsch.4, 37.
  • RISI. 2012. Outlook for Global Recovered Paper Markets (6th Edition).
  • Sacia WK, Simmons J. 2006. The effects of changing ONP quality on a newsprint mill. Tappi J.5, 13-17.
  • Sánchez A. 2009. Graphic paper recycling – markets and quality requirements. Proceedings of COST Action E48 The Limits of Paper Recycling – The Final Conference, Munich (Germany), May 6-7, paper 5.
  • Severtson SJ, Wang X, Kroll MS. 2002. Development of environmentally benign pressure-sensitive adhesive systems via modification of substrate properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 5668-5675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie0204383
  • Venditti RA, Lucas BE, Jameel H. 2007.The effects of adhesive properties on the removal of pressure sensitive adhesive contaminants by pressure screens. Prog. Pap. Recycl. 16, 18-31.
  • Villanueva A, Eder P.2011. End-of-waste criteria for waste paper: technicalproposals. Final report. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission, Seville (Spain).
  • Wagner J, Franke T, Schabel S. 2006. Automatic sorting of recovered paper: technical solutions and their limitations. Prog. Pap. Recycl. 16, 13-23.
  • White C. 2007. Quality matters: the mill buyers perspective. European Paper Recycling Conference, Amsterdam (The Netherlands), Oct. 3-5.
  • Yan Z, Deng Y. 2003. Water-soluble/dispersible cationic pressure-sensitive adhesives. I. Adhesives from solution polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 90, 1624-1630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.12819
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet