Lógica modal megárico-estoicaPosibilidad y necesidad como operadores aléticos

  1. Fernández Cuesta, José Alejandro 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Human Review: International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

ISSN: 2695-9623

Year of publication: 2021

Issue Title: 500 years of Greek Legacy

Volume: 10

Issue: 2

Pages: 261-270

Type: Article

DOI: 10.37467/GKA-REVHUMAN.V.2841 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Human Review: International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

Abstract

In this article, we introduce a possible way to interpret the possibility and necessity notions developed within the Megaric-Stoic logic as alethic modal operators. Megaric-Stoic semantics will be introduced as metaphysical background for necessity and possibility definitions and arguments will be offered in order to give up the prevailing interpretations which include ad hoc variables. After proposing the survey of Diodorus definitions from relational modal semantics, a series of topics that deserve to be revisited from this perspective will be pointed out.

Bibliographic References

  • Benítez, A. (2015). Lógicas no clásicas. Una introducción. Escolar y Mayo Editores.
  • Bocheński, I. M. (1963). Ancient Formal Logic. North-Holland Publish Co.
  • Coxon, A. H. (1986). The fragments of Parmenides. A critical text with introduction, the ancient testimonia and commentary. Van Gorcum.
  • de Harven, V. (2016). Necessity, Possibility and Determinism in Stoic Thought en Cresswell, M., Mares, E. y Rini, A., Logical Modalities from Aristotle to Carnap: The Story of Necessity (pp. 70-90). Cambridge University Press.
  • Diels, H. (1906). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Weidmannsche Buchhandlung y Kranz, W. ed. (1952), sexta edición revisada con adiciones e índice.
  • Goldblatt, R. (1980). Diodorean modality in Minkowski spacetime. Studia Logica, 39, pp. 219-236.
  • Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Cornell University Press.
  • KnealeW. y M. (1962). The Development of Logic. Oxford University Press.
  • Kripke, S. (1963). Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16, pp. 83-94.
  • Lewis, C. I. (1918). A Survey of Symbolic Logic. University of California Press.
  • Mates, B. (1973). Lógica de los Estoicos. (M. García Baró, Trad.). Tecnos. (Obra original publicado en 1985)
  • Prior, A. (1955). Diodoran Modalities. Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 5, pp. 205–213.
  • Las fuentes clásicas no especificadas se citan en su edición canónica:
  • Damascio, De principiis.
  • Simplicio, Física.
  • Teofrasto, Physikoi dóxai.
  • Alejandro de Afrodisias, Comentario a los Analíticos Primeros de Aristóteles Libro Primero, I.
  • Aristóteles, Sobre la interpretación.
  • —Analíticos primeros.
  • —Metafísica.
Data source: Dialnet