Contrafácticos cuánticosaproximación lógico-filosófica a las medidas cuánticas sin interacción

  1. Fernández Cuesta, José Alejandro 1
  2. Sánchez Ovcharov , Carmen 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  2. 2 Universidad Camilo José Cela
    info

    Universidad Camilo José Cela

    Villanueva de la Cañada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03f6h9044

Zeitschrift:
Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia

ISSN: 2463-1159,  0124-4620

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Titel der Ausgabe: Vol. 23 Núm. 46 (2023)

Ausgabe: 23

Nummer: 46

Seiten: 313-337

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.18270/RCFC.V23I46.3841 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia

Zusammenfassung

The present paper introduces a logical-philosophical approach to the interaction free measurements (ifm), which are related to some quantum physical experiments. The ways of addressing the study from a formal perspective will be explained, as well as some of the main challenges that emerge when carrying out this approach.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Bacciagaluppi, Guido. “Is Logic Empirical?” PhilSci-Archive [preprint] (2007): 1-41.
  • Birkhoff, Garrett., y Von Neumann, John. “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics”. Annals of Mathematics Second Series 37.4, 1936. 823-843.
  • Dalla Chiara, María L., y Giuntini, Roberto. “Quantum Logics”. Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Eds. Gabbay, Dov M. y Guenthner, F. Dordrecht: Springer, 2002. 1-29.
  • Delgado Pineda, M y Muñoz Bouzo, M. J. Lenguaje matemático. Conjuntos y números 2da. Ed. Madrid: UNED, 2020.
  • Elitzur Avshalom., & Vaidman Lev. “Quantum Mechanical Interaction-Free Measurements”. Foundations of Physics 23.7 (1993): 987-997.
  • Everett, H. “´Relative State’ Formulation of Quantum Mechanics”. Reviews of Modern Physics 29.3 (1957): 454-462.
  • Fernández Cuesta, José A. “Lógica modal megárico-estoica: posibilidad y necesidad como operadores aléticos”. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review 10.1 (2021): 261-270.
  • Fernández Cuesta, José A. . “La interpretación modal de la mecánica cuántica. De la lógica cuántica al problema de la medida”. Revista de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España [en imprenta] (2023).
  • Gherab Martín, K. y Sánchez Ovcharov, Carmen. “Conociendo el efecto Zenón cuántico en experimentos contrafácticos: una aproximación filosófica”. Ontology Studies 10 (2010): 115-130.
  • Griffiths, Robert. “The New Quantum Logic”. Foundations of Physics 44.6 (2014): 610-640.
  • Grynberg Gilbert., Aspect Alain., y Fabre, Claude. Introduction to Quantum Optics: from the Semi-classical Approach to Quantized Light. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • Kwiat P., et ál. “Interaction Free Measurement”. Physical Review Letters 74 (1998): 4673-4766.
  • Lewis, David K. Counterfactuals. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 1973.
  • Méndez, José M., y Robles, Gemma. “Lógica de la relevancia”. Filosofía de la Lógica. Coord. Frápolli, María J. Madrid: Tecnos, 2007.
  • Mitchison, Graeme., y Jozsa, Richard. “Counterfactual Computation”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 457.2009 (2001): 1175-1193.
  • Prior, A. N. “The Runabout Inference-Ticket”. Analysis 21.2 (1960): 38-39.
  • Priest, Graham. An Introduction to Non-classical Logic. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  • Putnam, H. (1969). “Is Logic Empirical? Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Eds. Cohen, R. y Wartofsky, M. (vol. 5, pp. 216-241)”. Reidel. Reimpreso como: The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
  • Sánchez Ovcharov, Carmen. “Lectura filosófica de la constitución histórica del principio de complementariedad”. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Humanas 7.1 (2018): 33-38.
  • Vaidman, Lev. “On the Realization of Interaction-free Measurements”. Quantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B 6.3 (1994): 119-124.
  • Vaidman, Lev. “On Schizophrenic Experiences of the Neutron or Why we Should Believe in the Many‐worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory”. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12.3 (1998): 245-261.
  • Vaidman, Lev. Discussion: Byrne and Hall on Everett and Chalmers, 2000. ArXiv: 0001057.
  • Vaidman, Lev. Probability and the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory, 2001. ArXiv: 0111072.
  • Vaidman, Lev. The meaning of the Interaction-Free Measurements. Foundations of Physics 33.3, 2003.
  • Vaidman, Lev. “Interaction-Free Measurements (Elitzur—Vaidman, EV IFM)”. Compendium of Quantum Physics. Eds. D. Greenberger, K. Hentschel y F. Berlin: Weinert Springer, 2009. 317-322.
  • Vaidman, Lev. “Counterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics”. Compendium of Quantum Physics (2018): 132–136.
  • Vaidman, Lev. Analysis of counterfactuality of counterfactual communication protocols. Physical Review A, 99 (2019a).
  • Vaidman, Lev. “Ontology of the Wave Function and the Many-worlds Interpretation”. Quantum Worlds: Perspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics. Eds. Lombardi Olimpia, Fortin Sebastian, López Cristian & Federico Holik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019b. 93-106.
  • Vaidman, Lev. “Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition). Ed. Edward N. Zalta. 2021.
  • Wilson, Alastair. The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics and Modal Realism. Oxford University Press, 2020.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace & co., 2021.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet