Compatibilidad de respuesta y el efecto Simon

  1. Jesús María Alvarado Izquierdo
  2. Carmen Santisteban Requena

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2004

Volume: 16

Issue: 2

Pages: 276-281

Type: Article

More publications in: Psicothema


JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

  • Year 2004
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.558
  • Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 0.103
  • Article influence score: 0.0
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 57/100 (Ranking edition: SSCI)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2004
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.206
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: Psychology (miscellaneous) Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 127/207


  • Social Sciences: A+


Relationship between the response compatibility and the Simon effects. The relationship between the response compatibility and Simon effects has been studied. It is assumed that both phenomena affects, in principle, the response stage in the human information processing. The response compatibility effect has been obtained using a visual flanker task while the Simon effect has been carried out including an auditory stimulus overlapping with the response to the visual task. The main goal of this work is to study the relationship between both effects. The results show an interaction between them suggesting an underlying common mechanism of activation

Bibliographic References

  • Acosta, E. Jr. y Simon, J.R. (1976). The effect of irrelevant information on the stages of processing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 181-187.
  • Alvarado, J.M., Santalla, Z. y Santisteban, C. (1999). An evaluation of the CODE Theory of Visual Attention extended to two dimensions. Acta Psychologica, 103, 239-255.
  • Alvarado, J. y Santisteban, C. (2000). DEVAT: Design of Experiments for Visual Attention Tasks. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 5(4), 1-12.
  • Coles, M.G.H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T.R., Eriksen, C.W. y Donchin, E. (1985). A Psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-533.
  • Eriksen, B.A. y Eriksen, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
  • Eriksen, C.W., Coles, M.G.H., Morris, L.R. y O’Hara, W.P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competion. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165-168.
  • Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., Sirevaag, E.J., Eriksen, C.W. y Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A Psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.
  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. y Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional Overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-Response compatibilitya model and taxonomy. Psichological Review, 97, 253-270.
  • Kornblum, S. y Lee, J.W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
  • Kornblum, S., Stevens, G.T. Whipple y Requin, J.(1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli:1. the time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with stroop-like stimuli, simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 688-714.
  • Logan, G.D. (1996). The Code Theory of Visual Attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
  • Mewaldt, S.P., Conelly, C.L. y Simon, J.R. (1980). Response selection in choice reaction time: Test of a buffer model. Memory and Cognition, 8, 606-611.
  • Santalla, Z., Alvarado, J.M. y Santisteban, C. (1999). ¿El ruido afecta a la focalización de la atención visual? Psicothema, 11(1), 97-111.
  • Santisteban, C. y Alvarado, J.M. (2000). Predicciones bajo hipótesis de distribuciones Gaussianas y Laplacianas en el modelo CTVA-2D. Psicothema, 12 (sup 2), 514-518.
  • Santisteban, C., Alvarado, J.M. y Cortijo, M. (2003). Grouping by similarity in CTVA-2D model of visual attention. Methods of Psychological Research Online (en prensa).
  • Simon, J.R. (1982). Effect of an auditory stimulus on the processing of a visual stimulus under single and dual-task conditions. Acta Psychologica, 51, 61-73.
  • Simon, J.R., Acosta, E. Jr., Mewaldt, S.P. y Speidel, C.R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 16-22.
  • Simon, J.R. y Berbaum, K. (1990). Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the «Stroop effect» vs. the «Simon effect». Acta Psychologica, 73, 159-170.
  • Simon, J.R. y Small, A.M.(1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology. 53, 433-435.
  • Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
  • Valle-Inclán, F. del, Rumbo, T., Rendondo, M. y Lamas, J. (1995). El efecto Simon estudiado con potenciales cerebrales relacionados con el movimiento. Psicothema, 7(1), 139-146.