Análisis comparativo de las teorías implícitas sobre la inteligencia elaboradas por docentes y estudiantes del ámbito educativo

  1. Carpintero Molina, Elvira
  2. Cabezas Gómez, Diana
Revue:
EduPsykhé: Revista de psicología y educación

ISSN: 1579-0207

Année de publication: 2007

Volumen: 6

Número: 1

Pages: 109-122

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: EduPsykhé: Revista de psicología y educación

Résumé

This paper presents the results obtained once the TIEP-II questionnaire of implicit theories on intelligence was elaborated and validated. Our findings show no significant differences between teachers and students of educational carers in their implicit theories, although the students present minimal variations depending on their course level. An analysis of the results and a more extensive administration of the questionnaire will allow consideration of the consequences of a specific implicit theory

Références bibliographiques

  • Cabezas, D. y Carpintero, E. (2006). Teorías implícitas sobre la inteligencia en docentes. EduPsykhé 1, 129-142.
  • Carpintero, E., Cabezas, D., González, C., y Fernández, P. (2003). Análisis de las teorías implícitas de la inteligencia en alumnos de Educación Primaria. EduPsykhé 1, 81-105.
  • Dweck, C.S. (1995). Implicit theories as organizers of goals and behavior. En P.M. Gollwitzer y J.A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. New York: Guilford Press
  • Dweck, C.S. y Bempechat, J. (1983). Children´s theories of intelligence: Consequences for learning. En S. Paris y G. Olson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Dweck, C.S., Chiu, C. y Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychology Inquiry, 6, 267-285.
  • Dweck, C.S. y Elliott, E.S. (1983). Achievement motivation. En P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Dweck, C.S. y Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to personality and motivation. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
  • Fry, P.S. (1984). Teacher´s conceptions of students´ intelligence and intelligent functioning: A cross-sectional study of elementary, secondary and tertiary level teachers. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 457-474.
  • Lee, K. (1996). A study of teacher responses based on their conception of intelligence. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 31, 1-12.
  • Lynott, D. y Woolfolk, A.E. (1994). Teachers´ implicit theories of intelligence and their educational goals. The Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 253-264.
  • Rodrigo, M.J., Rodríguez, A. y Marrero, J. (1993). Las teorías implícitas: una aproximación al conocimiento cotidiano. Madrid: Visor.
  • Rodrigo, M.J. y Correa, N. (2000). Teorías implícitas, modelos mentales y cambio educativo. En J. Pozo y C. Monereo (Coord.), El aprendizaje estratégico. Madrid: Santillana.
  • Sternberg, R., Conway, B., Ketron, J. y Bernstein, M. (1981). People´s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37-55.
  • Swann, W.B. y Snyder, M. (1980). On translating beliefs into action: Theories of ability and their implications in an instructional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 879-888.
  • Yee, W.C.S. y Ling, Q.M. (2000). Special Educators’ Implicit Theories of Intelligence. Comunicación presentada en Millennium Symposium on Intellectual Disability. Singapur.