La agresión entre iguales en la educación secundaria obligatoriatipología de conductas y diferencias entre los grupos

Bibliographic References

• Bagwell, C.L., Coie, J.D., Terry, R.A., & Lochman, J.E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 280-305.
• Boulton, M.J., & Smith, P.K. (1994). Bully/victim pro- blems in middle-school children: Stability, selfperceived competence, peer perceptions, and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315-329.
• Boulton, M.J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73-87.
• Carlson, G.A. (1995). Commentary: National plan for research on child and adolescent mental health disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 724-726.
• Cillessen, A.H.N., Bukowski, W.M., & Haselager, G.J.T. (2000). Stability of sociometric categories. En A.H.N. Cillessen & W.M. Bukowski (Eds.), recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. New directions for child and adolescent development, No. 88. (pp.3-11). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
• Coie, J.D, Dodge, K., Terry, R., & Wright, V. (1991). The role of aggression in peer relations: An analysis of aggression episodes in boys’ play groups. Child Development, 62, 812-826.
• Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557- 570.
• Coie, J.D., Lochman, J.E., Terry, R., & Hyman, C. (1992). Predicting early adolescent disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 783-792.
• Coie. J., Terry, R.A., Zariski, A., & Lochman, J. (1995). Early adolescent social influences on delinquent behaviour. En J. McCord (Ed.), Coercion and punishment in log-term perspectives (pp. 229-244). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Craig, W.M. (1998). The relationships among bull- ying, victimisation, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123-130.
• Crick, N.R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behaviour in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317-2327.
• Crick, N.R., & Grotpeter, J.K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and psycho-social adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
• Defensor del Pueblo (2000). Violencia escolar: El maltrato entre iguales en la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Madrid: Publicaciones del defensor del Pueblo.
• Díaz-Aguado, M.J., Martínez Arias, R., & Martín Seoane, G. (2004). Prevención de la violencia y lucha contra la exclusión desde la adolescencia. Volumen 1. La violencia entre iguales en la escuela y en el ocio. Estudios comparativos e instrumentos de evaluación. Madrid: INJUVE.
• Dixon, M.M. (2002). Surviving middle school, junior high, and high school as a hunted outsider. Retrieved September, 2002 from http://www.ravenday-s.org/raven.html
• Gifford-Smith, M.E., & Brownell, C.A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235-284.
• Griffin, R.S., & Gross, A.M. (2004). Childhood bull- ying: Current empirical findings and future directions for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 379-400.
• Harrist, A.W., Zaia, A.F., Bates, J.E., Dodge, K.A., & Pettit, G.S. (1997). Subtypes of social withdrawal in early childhood: sociometric status and socialcognitive differences across four years. Child development, 68, 278-294.
• Haynie, D.L., Nansel, T.R., Eitel, P., Davis Crump, A., Sailor, k., Yu, K. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29-49.
• Hodges, E.V.E., Malone, M-J., & Perry, D.G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032-1039.
• Lagerspeltz, K-M-, Björqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggession more typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11 to 12 yers old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 403-414.
• Leary, M-R., Kowalski, R.M., Smith, L., & Phillips, S. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 202-214.
• Lease, A.M., Kennedy, C.A., & Axelrod, J.L. (2002). Children’s social construction of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87-109.
• Luther, S., & McMahon, T. (1996). Peer repution among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 581-603.
• Maasen, G., Akkermans, W., & Van der Linden, J. (1996). Two-dimensional sociometric status determination with rating scales. Small Group Research, 27, 56-78.
• Maassen, G.H., van Boxtel, H.W., & Goosness, F.A. (2005). Reliability of nominations and two-dimensional rating scale methods for sociometric status determination. Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 51-68.
• Miller-Johnson, S., Coie, J., Maumary-Gremaud, A., Bierman, K., & CPPR Group (2002). Peer rejection and aggression and early starter models of conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 217-230.
• Nansel, T., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R., Ruan, J., SimonsMorton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviours among US youth. Prevalence and association with psychological adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094-2100-
• Newcomb, A.F., & Bukowski, W. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children’s peer group status. Developmental Psychology, 19, 856-867.
• Ollendick, T.H., Weist, M.D., Borden, M. C., & Greene, R.W. (1992). Sociometric status and academic, behavioural, and psychological adjustment: A five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 80-87.
• Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at schools: What we know and what we can do. Williston, VT: Blackwell Pub.
• Olweus, D. (1996). The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. University of Bergen.
• Olweus, D. (2001). Bullying at school: tacking the problem. The OECD Observer, 225, 24-26.
• Paquette, J., & Underwood, M. (1997). Gender differences in young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 242-266.
• Parker, J.G., & Asher, S.R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment. Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389.
• Pellegrini, A.D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, vicxtims, and aggressive victims. Factors relating to group affiliation and vixtimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216-224.
• Perry, D.G., Kusel, S.J., & Perry, L.P. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807-814.
• Perry, D.G., Perry, L.C., & Rasmussen, P. (1986). Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Development, 57, 700-711.
• Perry, D.G., Williard, J., & Perry, L.C. (1990). Peer’s perceptions of the consequences that victimized children provide aggressors. Child Development, 61, 1310-1325.
• Rigby, K., Cox, I., & Balck, G. (1997). Cooperativeness and bully/victim problems among Australian schoolchildren. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 357-368.
• Rigby, K., & Slee, P.T. (1991). Bullying among Australian schoolchildren: reported behaviour and attitudes to victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615-627.
• Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, vixctims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 30-44.
• Sandstrom, M.J., & y Coie, J.D. (1999). A developmental perspective on peer rejection: mechanisms of stability and change. Child Development, 70, 955-966.
• Schuster, B. (2001). Rejection and victimization by peers. En J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and the victimized. (pp.290-309). New York. Guilford Press.
• Schwartz, D., Proctor, L.J., & Chien, D.H. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioural dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. En J. Juvonen, & S. graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. (pp.147-174). New York. Guilford Press.
• Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children’s peer groups. Jpurnal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 181-192.
• Schwartz, D., Dodge, K.A., Pettit, G.S., & Bates, J.E. (1997). The early soca¡ialization of aggressive victims of bullying. Child development, 68, 665-675.
• Smith, PK & Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying :findings from a survey of English schools alter a decade of research. Childhood, 7, 193-212.
• Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. En A.H.N. Cillessen & W.M. Bukowski (Eds.), recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. New directions for child and adolescent development, No. 88. (pp.27- 53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
• Toblin, R.L., Schwartz, D., Hopmeyer Gorman, A., & Abo-ezzedine, T. (2005). Social-cognitive and behavioural attributes of aggressive victims of bullying. Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 329- 346.
• Underwood, M., Galen, B., & Paquette, J. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression. Why can’t we all just get along? Social Development, 10, 248-266.
• Unnever, J.D. (2005). Bullies, aggressive victims, and victims: Are they distinct groups? Aggressive Behavior, 31, 153-171.
• Unnever, J.D., & Cornell, D. (2003). The culture of bullying. Journal of School Violence, 2, 5-27.
• Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A.J., de Winter, A.F., Verhulst, F.C., & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672-682.
• Vossekuil, B., Fein, R.A., Reddy, M., Forum, R., Modzeleski, W. (2002). The final report and findings of the Safe School Initiative: Implications for the pre- vention of school attacks in the United States. Washington, DC: US Secret Service and US department of education
• Wiggins, J.S., & Winder, C.L.(1961). The Peer Nomination Inventory: An empirically derived sociometric measure of adjustment in preadolescent boys. Psychological Reports, 9, 643-677.