El análisis económico del derecho en la encrucijada

  1. Cabrillo, Francisco
  2. Albert López-Ibor, Rocío
Journal:
Ekonomiaz: Revista vasca de economía

ISSN: 0213-3865

Year of publication: 2011

Issue Title: La nueva economía institucional

Issue: 77

Pages: 200-221

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Ekonomiaz: Revista vasca de economía

Abstract

Law and Economics (L&E) has grown considerably over the last twenty years and has become one of the most influential approaches in the analysis of legal issues; L&E has also become a very useful tool for economists in designing reforms and economic development programs, in which the role of institutions, law and administration of justice have come to play a greater role than in the past. As a live discipline, various approaches and methods converged in it: behavioral law and economics, institutional economics, experimental law and economics ... featuring a very interesting and complex framework of this discipline.

Bibliographic References

  • Becker, G. (1968): «Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach». The Journal of Political Economy , 76, 169-217.
  • Becker, G. (2009): «Libertarian Paternalism» en G. Becker y R. Posner Uncommon Sense, Uni­versity of Chicago Press, 147-­150.
  • Block, M. y Gerety, V. (1995): «Some Experi­mental Evidence on Differences between Stu­dent and Prisioner Reactions to Monetary Penalties and Risks» Journal of Legal Studies, 123-­138.
  • Cabrillo, F. (1990): «Una nueva frontera: el análisis económico del derecho». Economía del Derecho Información Comercial Española num. 687.
  • Cabrillo, F. y Fitzpatrick, S. (2007): Economics of Courts and Litigation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK) – Northampton (MA, USA).
  • Calabressi, G. (1961): «Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts». Yale Law Journal, n.º 70, 499-­553.
  • Coase, R. (1960): «The Problem of Social Cost». The Journal of Law and Economics, 1­44
  • Coase, R. (1988): The Firm, the Market and the Law Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Coase, R. (1993): «Coase on Posner on Coase» Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics núm. 149; 96­-98.
  • Davis, D. y Holt, C (1993): Experimental Economics, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Dezhbakhsh, H.; Rubin, P. y Shepherd, J. (2003): «Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel Data». American Law and Economics Review, V5, N2, (344-­376).
  • Donohue, J. (2009): «The impact of the death penalty on murder». Criminology & Public Policy Volumen 8, núm. 4, 795­-801.
  • Donohue, J. y Wolfers, J. (2005): «Uses and Abuses of. Statistical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate». Stanford Law Review. 58, 787.
  • Garoupa, N. y Ulen, T. (2008): «The Market for Legal Innovation: Law and Economics in Europe and the United States» Alabama Law Review, vol. 59 (5), 1555­1633.
  • Gazal-Ayal, O. (2007) «Economic Analysis of Law and Economics». Capital University Law Review, Vol. 35, p. 3.
  • Gittings, R. y Mocan, H. (2003): «Getting Off Death Row: Commuted Sentences and the Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment.» Journal of Law and Economics, Volume 46, Number 2
  • Herbert, S. (1955): «A Behavioral Model of Ra­tionality Choice». Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69. MIT press.
  • Hoffman, E. y Spitzer, M. (1983): «The Coase Theorem: Some Experimental Tests». Journal of Law and Economics, 73­-98.
  • Hoffman, E. y Spitzer, M. (1993): «Willingness to Pay vs. Willing­ ness to accept Legal and Economics Implications». Washington University Law Quarterly, 59­114.
  • Holt, C. (1995): «Industrial Organization: a Survey of Laboratory Research. The Handbook of Experimental Economics Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Jolls, C. Sunstein, C. y Thaler, R. (1998): «A Behavioral Approach to Law and Econo­mics». Stanford Law Review, 50 1471­-1550.
  • Kagel, J. (1995): «Auctions: A survey of Experi­mental Economics en The Handbook of Experimental Economics Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Kanheman, D. y Tversky, A. (1979): «Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk». Econometrica, 47(2), 263­-292.
  • Landes, W. (2003): «The Empirical Side of Lawe & Economics». University Chicago Law Review, 167­-180.
  • Landes, E. y Posner, R. (1978): «The Economics of the Baby Shortage: A Modest Propo­sal». Journal of Legal Studies.
  • Ledyard, J. (1995): «Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Economics». The Handbook of Experimental Economics Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Mc Adams, R. (2000): «Experimental Law and Economics». Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vólumen 1, editado por B. Bouckaert y G. De Geest. Edward Elgar.
  • Posner, R. (1993): «The New Institutional Eco­nomics Meets Law and Economics». Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics núm. 149; 73­-87.
  • Posner, R. (2007): Economic Analysis of law, Aspen.
  • Roth, A. (1995a): «Introduction to a Experi­mental Economics». The Handbook of Experimental Economics Princeton, Princeton Uni­versity Press.
  • Roth, A. (1995b): «Bargaining Experiments». The Handbook of Experimental Economics Prince­ton, Princeton University Press.
  • Sunder, S. (1995): «Experimental Assets Mar­ket: A Survey». The Handbook of Experimental Economics Princeton, Princeton Universi­ty Press.
  • Sunstein, C. y Thaler, R. (2003): «Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron». The University of. Chicago Law Review, 70(4).
  • Thaler, R. (1980): «Toward a positive theory of consumer choice». Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 1, 39-60.
  • Williamson, O. (1993): «Transaction Costs meets Posnerian Law and Economics». Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics núm. 149; 99-118.
Data source: Dialnet