(How) Do research and administrative duties affect university professors� teaching?

  1. García Gallego, Aurora
  2. Georgantzis, Nikolaos
  3. Martín Montaner, Joan Antoni
  4. Pérez Amaral, Teodosio
Revista:
Documentos de Trabajo (ICAE)

ISSN: 2341-2356

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 22

Páginas: 1-21

Tipo: Documento de Trabajo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDocta Complutense editor

Otras publicaciones en: Documentos de Trabajo (ICAE)

Resumen

We analyze the interaction between university professors� teaching quality and their research and administrative activities. Our sample is a high-quality individual panel data set from a medium size public Spanish university. Although, researchers teach roughly 20% more than non-researchers, their teaching quality is also 20% higher. Over much of the relevant range, we find a nonlinear and positive effect of research output and teaching quantity on teaching quality. Instructors with no research are 5 times more likely than the rest to be among the worst teachers and up to two-thirds of the professors could improve their teaching by increasing research.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Becker, William E. Jr. 1975. “The University Professor as a Utility Maximizer and Producer of Learning, Research, and Income.” The Journal of Human Resources. 10(1): 107-115.
  • Bedard, Kelly, and Peter J. Kuhn. 2008. “Where Class Size Really Matters: Class Size and Student Ratings of Instructor Effectiveness.” Economics of Education Review. 27 (3): 253-265.
  • Beleche, Trinidad, David Fairris, and Mindy Marks. 2012. “Do Course Evaluations Truly Reflect Student Learning? Evidence from an Objectively Graded post-test.” Economics of Education Review. 31 (5): 709-719.
  • Carrell, Scott E., and James E. West. 2010. “Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors.” Journal of Political Economy. 118 (3): 409-432.
  • Ewing, Andrew M. 2012. “Estimating the Impact of Relative Expected Grade on Student Evaluations of Teachers.” Economics of Education Review. 31 (1): 141-154.
  • Feldman, Kenneth A. 1987. “Research Productivity and Scholarly Accomplishment of College Teachers as Related to their Instructional Effectiveness: A Review and Exploration.” Research in Higher Education. 26 (3): 227-298.
  • Friedrich, Robert J., and Stanley J. Michalak Jr. 1983. “Why Doesn’t Research Improve Teaching?: Some Answers from a Small Liberal Arts College.” The Journal of Higher Education. 54 (2): 145-163.
  • Gomez-Mejia, Luis R., and David B. Balkin. 1992. “Determinants of Faculty Pay: An Agency Theory Perspective.” The Academy of Management Journal. 35 (5): 921-955.
  • Hattie, John, and Herbert W. Marsh. 1996. “The Relationship between Research and Teaching: A Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research. 66 (4): 507-542.
  • Hausman, Jerry A. 1978. “Specification Tests in Econometrics” Econometrica. 46 (6): 1251-1271.
  • Hsiao, Cheng. 2003. Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd Edition, Econometric Society Monographs, Cambridge University Press.
  • Isely, Paul, and Harinder Singh. 2005. “Do Higher Grades Lead to Favorable Student Evaluations?” Journal of Economic Education. 36 (1): 29-42.
  • Krautman, Anthony C., and William Sander. 1999. “Grades and Student Evaluation of Teachers.” Economics of Education Review. 18 (1): 59-63.
  • Lindbeck, A., and D.J. Snower. 2003. “The Firm as a Pool of Factor Complementarities.” IZA Discussion Paper 882.
  • Marsh, Herbert W. 1987. “Student’s Evaluation of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research.” International Journal of Educational Research. 11 (3): 263-253.
  • Marsh, Herbert W., and John Hattie. 2002. “The Relation Between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness: Complementary, Antagonistic or Independent Constructs?” The Journal of Higher Education. 73 (5): 603-641.
  • Martin, B.R. 2012. “Are Universities and University Research under Threat? Towards an Evolutionary Model of University Specialization.” Cambridge Journal of Economics. 36 (3): 543-565.
  • McPherson, Michael A. 2006. “Determinants of How Students Evaluate Teachers.” Journal of Economic Education. 37 (1): 3-20.
  • Mundlak, Yair. 1978. “On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data.” Econometrica. 46 (1): 69-85.
  • Noser, Thomas C., Herman Manakyan, and John R. Tanner. 1996. “Research Productivity and Perceived Teaching Effectiveness: A Survey of Economics Faculty.” Research in Higher Education. 37 (3): 299-321.
  • Porter, Stephen R., and Paul D. Umbach. 2001. “Analyzing Faculty Workload Data Using Multilevel Modeling.” Research in Higher Education. 42 (2): 171-196.
  • Shin, Jung C. 2011. “Teaching and Research Nexuses across Faculty Career Stage, Ability and Affiliated Discipline in a South Korean Research University.” Studies in Higher Education. 36 (4): 485-503.
  • Spiller, Pablo T., and Bennet A. Zelner. 1997. “Product Complementarities, Capabilities and Governance: A Dynamic Transaction Cost Perspective.” Industrial and Corporate Change. 6 (3): 561-594.
  • Stack, Steven. 2003. “Research Productivity and Student Evaluation of Teaching in Social Science Classes: A Research Note.” Research in Higher Education. 44 (5): 539-556.
  • Verburgh, Jan E., and Sari Lindblom-Ylänne. 2007. “Investigating the Myth of the Relationship between Teaching and Research in Higher Education: A Review of Empirical Research.” Studies in the Philosophy of Education. 26 (5): 449-465.
  • Vidal, Javier, and Miguel A. Quintanilla. 2000. “The Teaching and Research Relationship within an Institutional Evaluation.” Higher Education. 40 (2): 217-229.
  • Walstad, William, and Sam Allgood. 2005. “Views of Teaching and Research in Economics and Other Disciplines.” American Economic Review. 95 (2): 177-183.
  • Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd edition, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachussetts, London, England.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet