Validación de la versión española del Test Stroop de Alcohol

  1. Sánchez López, Alvaro
  2. Quinto Guillén, Rafael
  3. Pérez Lucas, Josefa
  4. Jurado Barba, Rosa
  5. Martínez Grass, Isabel
  6. Ponce Alfaro, Guillermo
  7. Rubio Valladolid, Gabriel
Aldizkaria:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Argitalpen urtea: 2015

Alea: 31

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 504-523

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.31.2.169491 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Anales de psicología

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

Attention bias for alcohol has proved useful to distinguish peo-ple with a pathological consumption of people who do not, and depend-ents who are more likely to fall in consumption. The aim of this study was to validate the Spanish version of the Alcohol Stroop test, designed to evaluate attention biases for alcohol in alcohol-dependent patients. The sample was composed by 173 participants divided into 2 groups: 1) �Pa-tients� (n = 88) meeting criteria for alcohol dependence; and 2) �Control� (n = 85) having a low risk for alcohol consumption, that completed the Stroop color naming Task (Classic Stroop), the Neutral Stroop test and the alcohol Stroop test. Statistically significant differences were found in the in-terference effects calculated for the Classic and Alcohol Stroop tests. Pa-tients compared to control participants showed a higher interference effect for alcohol-related stimuli than for neutral stimuli. These effects were ac-counted by an attention bias for alcohol-related information in patients. ROC curves were calculated for the three interference effects, showing an area under the curve statistically significant in the Classic Stroop interfer-ence and the Alcohol Stroop interference. This study provides the valida-tion of the Spanish version of the Alcohol Stroop test that allows to evalu-ate attention biases for alcohol stimuli in individuals with both pathologic alcohol consumption and alcohol dependence

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders (4th ed). Washington DC: Author.
  • Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Cox, W. M., Brown, M. A., & Rowlands, L. J. (2003). The effects of alcohol cue exposure on non-dependent drinkers’ attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 38, 45–49. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agg010.
  • Cox, W. M., Fadardi, J. S., & Pothos, E. M. (2006). The addiction-Stroop Test: theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psy-chological Bulletin, 132, 443-476. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.443.
  • Cox, W. M., Hogan, L. M., Kristian, M. R., & Race, J. H. (2002). Alcohol at-tentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers´ treatment outcome. Drug and Alcohol Dependendece, 68, 237-243. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00219-3.
  • Duka, T., & Townshend, J. M. (2004). The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology, 176, 353–361. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-1906-7
  • Fadardi, J. S., & Cox, W. M. (2006). Alcohol attentional bias: drinking sali-ence or cognitive impairment? Psychopharmacology, 185,169-178. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0268-0.
  • Fadardi, J. S., & Cox, W. M. (2009). Reversing the sequence: Reducing alco-hol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug and Alco-hol Dependence, 101, 137–145.
  • Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.11.015.
  • Field, M., & Cox, W. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97, 1-20. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030.
  • Field, M., Mogg, K., Mann, B., Bennett, G. A., & Bradley, B. P. (2012). At-tentional biases in abstinent alcoholics and their association with crav-ing. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. Advance online publication. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029626.
  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., y Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-CV). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
  • Fisher, L., Freed, D. M., & Corkin, S. (1990). Stroop color – test perfo-mance in patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Clinical Experi-mental Neuropsycholology, 12, 745–758. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01688639008401016.
  • Golden, C. J. (1975). A group version of the Stroop color and word test. Journal of Personality Assesment, 39, 386-388. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa3904_10.
  • Golden, C. J. (1978). Stroop Color and Word Test: A Manual for Clinical and Ex-perimental Uses. Wood Dale (Estados Unidos): Stoelting.
  • Grant, V. V., Stewart, S. H., & Birch, C. D. (2007). Impact of positive and anxious mood on implicit alcohol-related cognitions in internally moti-vated undergraduate drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2226–2237. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.02.012.
  • Ivano, R., García-Altés, A., & Nebot, M. (2011). Impacto social del consu-mo abusivo de alcohol en el estado Español: consumo, coste y políticas. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 85, 141-147. Recuperado de http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S113557272011000200003&script=sci_arttext
  • Johnsen, B. H., Laberg, J. C., Cox, W. M., Vaksdal, A., & Hugdahl, K. (1994). Alcoholic subjects' attentional bias in the processing of alcohol-related words. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 8, 111–115. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.8.2.111.
  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Koster, E. H. W., De Raedt, R., Goeleven, E., Franck, E., y Crombez, G. (2005). Mood-congruent attentional biases in dysphoria: Maintained at-tention to and impaired attentional disengagement from negative in-formation. Emotion, 5, 446-455. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.446.
  • Lobbestael, J., Leurgans, M., & Arntz, A. (2010). Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 75-79. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.693.
  • Lusher, J., Chandler, C., & Ball, D. (2004). Alcohol dependence and the al-cohol Stroop paradigm: evidence and issues. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 75, 225–231. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.03.004.
  • Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., & Barad, V. (2003). Competition for priority in processing increases prefrontal cortex’s involvement in top – down: an event – related fMRI study of the stroop task. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 212–222. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00108-3.
  • Nöel, X., Van der Linden, M., Brevers, D., Campanella, S., Verbanck, P., et al. (2012). Separating intentional inhibition of prepotent responses and resistance to proactive interference in alcohol-dependent individuals. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. Advance online publication. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.08.021.
  • Observatorio Español sobre Drogas. (2009). Informe 2009. Madrid: Ministe-rio de Sanidad y Política Social. Disponible en: www.pnsd.msc.es/Categoria2/observa/pdf/oed-2009.pdf
  • Observatorio Español sobre Drogas. (2009). Encuesta Domiciliaria sobre Al-cohol y Drogas en España. Informe 2009 (principales resultados). Madrid: Minis-terio de Sanidad y Política Social. Recuperado de http://www.pnsd.msc.es/Categoria2/observa/estudios/home.htm.
  • Reeve, W. V., & Schandler, S. L. (2001). Frontal lobe functioning in adoles-cents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Adolescence, 36, 749–765. Recuperado de http://www.vjf.cnrs.fr/clt/php/va/Page_revue.php?ValCodeRev=ADO.
  • Robinson, T.E., Berridge, K.C., 1993. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247–291. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P.
  • Rubio, G., Bermejo, J., Caballero, M. C., Santo Domingo, J. (1998). Valida-ción de la prueba para la identificación de trastornos por uso de alcohol (AUDIT) en atención primaria. Revista Clínica Española, 198, 11–14. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es/revistas/revista-clinica-espa%C3%B1ola-65.
  • Ryan, F. (2002). Attentional bias and alcohol dependence: A controlled study using the modified Stroop paradigm. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 471–482. Doi: http;//dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00183-6.
  • Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791-804. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
  • Stetter, F, Chaluppa, C., Ackermann, K., Straube, E. R., & Mann, K. (1994). Alcoholics´ selective processing of alcohol related words and cognitive performance on a Stroop task. European Psychiatry, 9, 71-76. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.com/journals/european-psychiatry/0924-9338.
  • Treisman, A. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282-299. Doi: 10.1037/h0027242. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0027242.
  • Waters, A. J., & Feyerabend, C. (2000). Determinants and effects of atten-tional bias in smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 111–120. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0893-164X.14.2.111.
  • Zanarini, M. C., Skodol, A. E., Bender, D., Dolan, R., Sanislow, C., Schaefer, E., Morey, L. C., Grilo, C. M., Shea, M. T., McGlashan, T. H., & Gunderson, J. G. (2000). The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality
  • Disorders Study: Reliability of axis I and II diagnoses. Journal of Personali-ty Disordorders, 14, 291-299. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.291.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet