Assessment of Reading Precursors in Spanish-Speaking Children

Bibliographic References

• Adams M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Alegría J. (2006). Por un enfoque psicolingüístico del aprendizaje de la lectura y sus dificultades – 20 años después [Toward a psycholinguistic approach to reading acquisition and reading difficulties – 20 years later]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 29, 93–111.
• Araújo S., Reis A., Petersson K. M., & Faísca L. (2015). Rapid automatized naming and reading performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 868–883. http://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000006
• Babayiğit S., & Stainthorp R. (2014). Correlates of early reading comprehension skills: A componential analysis. Educational Psychology, 34, 185–207. http://doi.org/10.1080/ 01443410.2013.785045
• Ball E. W., & Blachman B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49–66. http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.26.1.3
• Bradley L., & Bryant P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421. http://doi.org/10.1038/301419a0
• Bravo L., Villalón M., & Orellana E. (2001). Procesos predictivos del aprendizaje inicial de la lectura en primero básico [Processes that predict initial reading acquisition in first-graders]. Boletín de Investigación Educacional, 16, 149–160.
• Bryant P. E., & Bradley L. (1985). Children’s reading problems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
• Bryne B., & Fielding-Barnsley R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451–455. http://doi. org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.451
• Byrne B. J. (1998). The foundation of literacy: The child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
• Calet N., Gutiérrez-Palma N., & Defior S. (2015). A crosssectional study of fluency and reading comprehension in Spanish primary school children. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 272–285. http://doi.org/10.1111/14679817.12019
• Caravolas M., Lervåg A., Defior S., Málková G. S., & Hulme C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth, in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 1398–1407. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612473122
• Caravolas M., Lervåg A., Mousikou P., Efrim C., Litavsky M., Onochie-Quintanilla E., … Hulme C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434536
• Carrillo M. S. (1994). Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition: A study in Spanish language. Reading and Writing, 6, 279–298. http://doi. org/10.1007/BF01027086
• Carrillo M. S., & Marín J. (1996). Desarrollo metafonológico y adquisición de la lectura: Un programa de entrenamiento [Metaphonological development and reading acquisition: A training program]. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, CIDE.
• Casillas A., & Goikoetxea E. (2007). Sílaba, principio-rima y fonema como predictores de la lectura y la escritura tempranas [Syllable, onset-rime, and phoneme as early reading and writing precursors]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 30, 245–259. http://doi.org/10.1174/021037007780705184
• Catts H. W., Fey M. E., Zhang X., & Tomblin J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38–50. http://doi.org/10.1044/01611461(2001/004)
• Cohen J. (1968). Multiple regression as a general dataanalytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 426–443. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0026714
• Cuban L. (1992). Why some reforms last: The case of the kindergarten. American Journal of Education, 100, 166–194. http://doi.org/10.1086/444013
• Cunningham A. E. (1990). Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 429–444. http://doi.org/10.1016/00220965(90)90079-N
• Defior S., Cary L., & Martos F. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135–148. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716402000073
• Defior S., Justicia F., & Martos F. (1998). Desarrollo del reconocimiento de palabras en lectores normales y retrasados en función de diferentes variables lingüísticas [The development of word recognition in normal and delayed readers as a function of several linguistic variables]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 21, 59–74. http://doi. org/10.1174/021037098760403479
• Defior S., & Tudela P. (1994). Effect of phonological training on reading and writing acquisition. Reading & Writing, 6, 299–320. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027087
• De Jong P. F., & van der Leij A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476. http://doi. org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.450
• De Jong P. F., & van der Leij A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51–77. http:// doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03
• Dickinson D. K., McCabe A., Anastasopoulos L., Peisner-Feinberg E. S., & Poe M. D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy. The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge in preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 47–69. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.465
• Domínguez A. B. (1996). El desarrollo de habilidades de análisis fonológico a través de programas de enseñanza [Development of phonological awareness skills through teaching programs]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 19, 69–81. http://doi.org/10.1174/021037096762905562
• Domínguez A., & Cuetos F. (1992). Desarrollo de las habilidades de reconocimiento de palabras en niños con distintas competencias lectoras [Development of wordrecognition skills in children with different reading competencies]. Cognitiva, 4, 193–208.
• Dowing J. A. (1963). Is a mental age of six essential for reading readiness? Educational Research, 6, 16–28. http://doi.org/10.1080/0013188640060103
• Dufva M., Niemi P., & Voeten M. J. M. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: From preschool to grade 2. Reading and Writing, 14, 91–117. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008186801932
• Ehri L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Eldredge J. L., Quinn B., & Butterfield D. D. (1990). Causal relationships between phonics, reading comprehension, and vocabulary achievement in the second grade. The Journal of Educational Research, 83, 201–214. http://doi.org/10.1080/ 00220671.1990.10885957
• Furnes B., & Samuelsson S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 85–95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005
• Gallego C. (2006, March). Los prerrequisitos lectores [Reading prerequisites]. Proceedings from the Congreso Internacional de Lectoescritura, Morelia, México.
• García-Madruga J. A. (2006). Comprensión de la lectura y memoria operativa [Reading comprehension and working memory]. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós Ibérica.
• Goswami U. (2000). Phonological and lexical processes. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 251–267. Vol. 3). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Goswami U. (2002). Early phonological development and the acquisition of literacy. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 111–125). London, UK: Guilford Press.
• Gough P. B., & Tunmer W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. http://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
• Guardia P. (2003). Relaciones entre habilidades de alfabetización emergente y la lectura desde nivel de transición mayor a primero básico [Links between emerging literacy skills and reading skills after first grade]. Psykhe, 12, 63–79.
• Gutierrez-Palma N., Raya-García M., & Palma-Reyes A. (2009). Detecting stress patterns is related to children’s performance on reading tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408090012
• Herrera L., & Defior S. (2005). Una aproximación al procesamiento fonológico de los niños prelectores: Conciencia fonológica, memoria verbal a corto plazo y denominación [An Approach to the phonological processing in prereading Spanish children: Phonological awareness, verbal short-term memory and naming]. Psykhe, 14, 81–95. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282005000200007
• Hirsch E. D. Jr. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge—of words and the world. Scientific insights into the fourth-grade slump and the nation’s stagnant comprehension scores. American Educator, 27, 10–13.
• Holliman A. J., Wood C., & Sheehy K. (2010). Does speech rhythm sensitivity predict children’s reading ability 1 year later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 356–366. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018049
• Holliman A. J., Wood C., & Sheehy K. (2012). A cross-sectional study of prosodic sensitivity and reading difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 32–48. http://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1467-9817.2010.01459.x
• Hoover W. A., & Gough P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160. http://doi. org/10.1007/BF00401799
• IBM Corporation (2010). SPSS statistics for Windows, version 19.0 (computer software). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
• Jiménez J. E., & Ortiz M. R. (1995). Conciencia fonológica y aprendizaje de la lectura: Teoría, evaluación e intervención [Phonological awareness and reading acquisition: Theory, assessment, and intervention]. Madrid, Spain: Síntesis.
• Jiménez Glez J. E., & Rodrigo López M. (1994). Is it true that the differences in reading performance between students with and without LD cannot be explained by IQ? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 155–163. http:// doi.org/10.1177/002221949402700304
• Jöreskog K. G., & Sörbom D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows (computer software). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
• Jorm A. F. (1983). Specific reading retardation and working memory: A review. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 311–342. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01865.x
• Kim Y. S., & Pallante D. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25, 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0
• Lervåg A., & Hulme C. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20, 1040–1048. http://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1467-9280.2009.02405.x
• Lovett M. W., Borden S. L., DeLuca T., Lacerenza L., Benson N. J., & Brackstone D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologicallyand strategy-based reading programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805–822. http:// doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.30.6.805
• Lundberg I., Frost J., & Petersen O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284. http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.23.3.1
• Miles T. R., & Ellis N. C. (1981). A lexical encoding difficulty II: Clinical observations. In G. T. Pavlidis & T. R. Miles (Eds.), Dyslexia research and its applications to education (pp. 230–235). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
• Müller K., & Brady S. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 14, 757–799. http://doi.org/10.1023/a: 101221770483
• National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
• Oakhill J. V., & Cain K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121. http://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
• Parrila R., Kirby J. R., & McQuarrie L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development? Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 3–26. http://doi.org/10.1207/ s1532799xssr0801_2
• Perfetti C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. http://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
• Rayner K., Foorman B. R., Perfetti C. A., Pesetsky D., & Seidenberg M. S. (2002). How should reading be taught? Scientific American, 286, 85–91. http://doi.org/10.1038/ scientificamerican0302-84
• Rosselli M., Mature E., & Ardila A. (2006). Predictores neuropsicológicos de la lectura en español [Neuropsychological reading precursors in Spanish]. Revista de Neurología, 42, 202–210.
• Sánchez E., García J. R., & Bustos A. (2010). La comprensión oral y escrita: ¿Es la decodificación de las palabras la única diferencia? [Oral and written comprehension: Is word decoding the only difference?] In M. S. Carrillo & A. B. Domínguez (Eds.), Dislexia y sordera: Líneas actuales en el estudio de la lengua escrita y sus dificultades [Dyslexia and deafness: Current research directions and difficulties in written language] (pp. 37–60). Málaga, Spain: Ediciones Aljibe.
• Schatschneider C., Fletcher J. M., Francis D. J., Carlson C. D., & Foorman B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265
• Schreiber J. B., Nora A., Stage F. K., Barlow E. A., & King J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. http://doi. org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
• Serrano F., Defior S., & Jiménez G. (2005). Evolución de la relación entre conciencia fonológica y lenguaje escrito en niños españoles de primer curso de educación primaria [The evolving relationship between phonological awareness and written language in first-grade Spanish children]. IberPsicología. Anales de la Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 10, 3–15.
• Seymour P. H. K., Aro M., & Erskine J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174. http://doi. org/10.1348/000712603321661859
• Share D. L. (2004). Knowing letter names and learning letter sounds: A causal connection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 213–233. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. jecp.2004.03.005
• Share D. L., & Stanovich K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: A model of acquisition and individual differences. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1–35.
• Snow C., Burns S., & Griffin P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• Sprugevica I., & Høien T. (2003). Enabling skills in early reading acquisition: A study of children in Latvian kindergarten. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 159–177. http://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1022843607921
• Stanovich K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. http:// doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
• Stanovich K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Stanovich K. E., & Siegel L. S. (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of children with reading-disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variabledifference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.24
• Suárez-Coalla P., García-de-Castro M., & Cuetos F. (2013). Variables predictoras de la lectura y la escritura en castellano [Variables that predict reading and writing in Spanish]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36, 77–89. http://doi. org/10.1174/021037013804826537
• Suggate S. P. (2010). Why what we teach depends on when: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1556–1579. http://doi. org/10.1037/a0020612
• Torgeson J. K., & Wagner R. K. (1999). The comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
• Vaessen A., Bertrand D., Tóth D., Csépe V., Faisca L., Reis A., & Blomert L. (2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 827–842. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019465
• Vellutino F. R., & Scanlon D. M. (2002). Emergent literacy skills, early instruction and individual differences as determinants of difficulties in learning to read: The case for early intervention. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 295–321). London, UK: Guilford Press.
• Vellutino F. R., Tunmer W. E., Jaccard J. J., & Chen R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32. http://doi.org/10.1207/ s1532799xssr1101_2
• Wagner R. K., & Torgeson J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological awareness and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
• Warmington M., & Hulme C. (2012). Phoneme awareness, visual-verbal paired-associate learning, and rapid automatized naming as predictors of individual differences in reading ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 45–62. http://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.534832
• Wilkinson G. S. (1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test–3 (WRAT-3). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
• Wimmer H., Mayringer H., & Landerl K. (2000). The double deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.668
• Woodcock R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised (WRMT-R). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
• Ziegler J. C., Bertrand D., Tóth D., Csépe V., Reis A., Faísca L., … Blomert L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406
• Zumbo B. D., Gadermann A. M., & Zeisser C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6, 21–29.