Efectos sobre la accesibilidad de la red de autovías planeada en el Plan de Infraestructuras para la Sostenibilidad del Transporte en Andalucía (España)

  1. Francisco Calvo-Poyo
  2. Javier Gutiérrez Puebla
  3. Juan Carlos García Palomares
  4. Borja Moya-Gómez
Journal:
Cuadernos geográficos de la Universidad de Granada

ISSN: 0210-5462,  2340-0129

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 58

Issue: 1

Pages: 229-252

Type: Article

DOI: 10.30827/CUADGEO.V58I1.6732 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Cuadernos geográficos de la Universidad de Granada

Abstract

The present study aims to analyze the territorial impacts in Andalusia (through changes in accessibility) derived from the improvements in the road network planned by the Ministry of Development and Housing of the Junta de Andalusia. For this purpose, a computer tool based on Geographic Information Systems was developed, and a series of accessibility and territorial cohesion indicators were calculated. To carry out the analysis of the effects of the Infrastructure Plan for the Sustainability of Transport in Andalusia, two scenarios were considered (with and without the planned actions). The effects of this plan on accessibility to hospitals, universities and logistics centers, as well as the improvements induced by four strategic actions, were studied as well. The results show the effects of the actions of this plan of infrastructures: an average reduction of the travel times of 3.6%, and an improvement of the territorial cohesion.

€ View funding

Funding information

En este artículo se han evaluado, en base a los cambios en accesibilidad y cohesión territorial, las actuaciones en materia de carreteras recogidas en el Plan de Infraestructuras para la Sostenibili-dad del Transporte en Andalucía (PISTA). Para ello se ha creado una herramienta en un SIG que permite obtener resultados agiles en materia de accesibilidad. Para mostrar la utilidad de esta he-rramienta, aquí se han mostrado los resultados del indicador tiempo medio ponderado, utilizan-do distintos escenarios (con y sin PISTA), para determinadas actuaciones concretas, y también de la accesibilidad a diferentes tipos de servicios (hospitales, universidades o áreas logísticas). Los resultados validan la utilidad de esta herramienta.

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Banister, D., y Berechman, Y. (2001). “Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth”. Journal of Transport Geography, 9:209-218.
  • Breheny, M. J. (1978). “The measurement of spatial opportunity in strategic planning”. Regional Studies, 12:463-479.
  • Bruinsma, F., y Rietveld, P. (1998). “The accessibility of European cities: theoretical framework and comparison of approaches”. Environment and Planning A, 30:499-521.
  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2004). A new partnership for cohesion: convergence, competitiveness, cooperation: Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Brussels.
  • COM (Commission of the European Communities) (2008). Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • COM (Commission of the European Communities) (2009). Libro Verde - RTE-T: Revisión de la política. Report Number, 44 final.
  • Curl, A., Nelson, J. D., y Anable, J. (2011). Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2, 3-11.
  • Dalvi, M. Q. (1978). Behavioural modelling, accessibility, mobility and need: concepts and measurement. Proceedings of 3rd Inter. Conf. Behavioural Travel Modelling. Tanunda. South Australia, Groom Helm London.
  • Domanski, R. (1979). “Accessibility, efficiency and spatial organization”. Environment and Planning, 11: 1189-1206.
  • Forslund, U. M. y Johansson, B. (1995). “Assessing road investments: accessibility changes, cost benefit and production effects”. Annals of Regional Science, 29:155-174.
  • García, J. C. (2000). “La medida de la accesibilidad”. Estudios de Construcción y Transportes, 88, 95-110.
  • García, M. J. S. (2001). Incorporación de medidas de accesibilidad espacio-temporal a un sistema de información geográfica (Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Alcalá).
  • Geertman, S. C. M. y Ritsema van Eck, J. (1995). “GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning”. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9:67-80.
  • Geurs, K. T., y van Wee., B.. (2004) “Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions”. Journal of Transport Geography, 12:127-140.
  • Gutiérrez, J. (2001). “Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border”. Journal of Transport Geography, 9:229-242.
  • Gutiérrez, J. y Urbano, P. (1996). “Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the trans-European road network”. Journal of Transport Geography, 4:15-25.
  • Gutiérrez, J., García, J. C. y López, E. (2006). “Análisis de los efectos de las infraestructuras de transporte sobre la accesibilidad y la cohesión regional”. Estudios de Construcción y Transportes, (105), 215-240.
  • Gutiérrez, J., González, R. y Gómez, G. (1996). “The European high-speed train network: Predicted effects on accessibility patterns”. Journal of Transport Geography, 4:227-238.
  • Gutiérrez, J. y Urbano, P (1996). “Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the trans-European road network”. Journal of Transport Geography, 4:15-25.
  • Gutiérrez, J. A., Naranjo, J. M., Jaraíz, F. J., Ruíz, E. E. (2015). “Estimación de la cohesión social en los municipios españoles tras la implantación de la Alta Velocidad ferroviaria”. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, (69), 113-138.
  • Hansen, W. G. (1959). “How accessibility shapes land-use”. Journal of American Institute of Planners, 25:73-76.
  • Hou, Q., y Li, S. M. (2011). “Transport infrastructure development and changing spatial accessibility in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China, 1990–2020”. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1350-1360.
  • Izquierdo, R. y Monzón, A. (1992). “La accesibilidad a las redes de transporte como instrumento de evaluación de la cohesión económica y social”. TTC, 56:33-56.
  • Jaraíz-Cabanillas, F. J., Autor, Herrera-Molina, E., Librada-Flores, S., Jeong, J. S., Nabal-Vicuña, M., y Jadad, A. R. (2017). “Network and Spatial Analysis to Assess and Guide Decisions about Equitable Accessibility to Health Services: The Public Palliative Care System in Extremadura (Spain)”. Diversity and Equality in Health and Care, 14(4): 184-192
  • Junta de Andalucía (2008). Plan de Infraestructuras para la Sostenibilidad del Transporte en Andalucía 2007-2013 (PISTA). Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes. Sevilla.
  • Junta de Andalucía (2016). Plan de Infraestructuras para la Sostenibilidad del Transporte en Andalucía (PISTA 2020). Consejería de Fomento y Vivienda. Sevilla.
  • Linneker, B. J. y Spence, N. A. (1992). “Accessibility measures compared in an analysis of the impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain”. Environment and Planning A, 24:1137-1154.
  • Linneker, B., y Spence, N. (1996). “Road transport infrastructure and regional economic development: The regional development effects of the M25 London orbital motorway”. Journal of Transport Geography, 4:77-92.
  • Liu, S. X., and X. A. Zhu. (2004). “Accessibility Analyst: an integrated GIS tool for accessibility analysis in urban transportation planning”. Environment and Planning B, 31:105-124.
  • López, E. (2007). Assessment of transport infrastructure plans: a strategic approach integrating environmental, efficiency and cohesion aspects. Tesis Doctoral, Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
  • López, E., Gutiérrez, J., y Gómez, G. (2008). “Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: an accessibility approach”. European Planning Studies, 16:277-301.
  • Martín, J. C., Gutiérrez, J., y Román, C (2004). “Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Index to measure the accessibility impacts of new infrastructure investments: the case of the high-speed train corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French border”. Regional Studies, 38:697-712.
  • Monzón, A., Ortega, E., y López, E. (editores) (2010). Evaluación de los impactos territoriales y económicos de planes de infraestructuras de transporte. PEIT 2005-2020. Cuadernos de Investigación del Transporte, TRANSyT, Madrid.
  • Morris, J. M., Dumble, P. L.y Wigan. M. R. (1979). “Accessibility indicators for transport planning”. Transportation Research Part A, 13:91-109.
  • Naranjo, J. M., Gutiérrez, J. A., Ruiz, E. E., y Cuadrado, D. (2016). “Accesibilidad logística del suroeste peninsular europeo”. GeoFocus. Revista Internacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Información Geográfica, (18), 83-104.
  • Orcao, A. I. E., y Cornago, C. D. (2007). “Accessibility to basic services in one of the most sparsely populated areas in Europe: the province of Teruel (Spain)”. Area, 39(3), 295-309.
  • Ortega, E., Mancebo, S., Otero, I. (2011). “Road and railway accessibility atlas of Spain”. Journal of Maps, 7(1), 31-41.
  • Páez, A., Farber, S., Mercado, R., Roorda, M., y Morency, C. (2013). “Jobs and the Single Parent: An Analysis of Accessibility to Employment in Toronto”. Urban Geography, 34(6), 815-842.
  • Páez, A., Scott, D. M., y Morency, C. (2012). “Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators”. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141-153.
  • Reggiani, A. (1998). Accessibility, Trade and Location Behavior: An Introduction. In Accessibility, Trade and Location Behaviour. ed. A. Reggiani, 1-14. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
  • Reyes, S., y Figueroa, I. M. (2010). “Distribución, superficie y accesibilidad de las áreas verdes en Santiago de Chile”. EURE, 36(109), 89-110.
  • Rodríguez, V. (2011). “Medición de la accesibilidad geográfica de la población a los Hospitales de Alta Resolución de Andalucía mediante herramientas SIG basadas en el análisis de redes”. GeoFocus. Revista Internacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Información Geográfica, (11), 265-292.
  • Spiekermann, K.y Neubauer, J. (2002). European accessibility and peripherality: concepts, models and indicators. Report Number, Report 2002:9. Nordregio, Stockolm.
  • Thomopoulos, N., Grant, S. y Tight, M. R. (2009). “Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evaluation: Current practice and a proposed methodology”. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32:351-.59.
  • Tillema, T. (2008). Road pricing: a transport geographical perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht: Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University.
  • Vandenbulcke, G., Steenberghen, T., y Thomas, I. (2009). “Mapping accessibility in Belgium: a tool for land-use and transport planning?”. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(1), 39-53.
  • Vickerman, R. W. (1974). “Accessibility, attraction and potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility”. Environment and Planning A, 6:675-691.
  • Vickerman, R. W., Spiekermann, K., y Wegener, M. (1999). “Accessibility and economic development in Europe”. Regional Studies, 33:1-15.
Data source: Dialnet