Explicación y causalidadDanto mirado desde Weber
ISSN: 1405-0927
Datum der Publikation: 2017
Nummer: 48
Seiten: 61-101
Art: Artikel
Andere Publikationen in: Historia y grafía
Zusammenfassung
Abstract: The author offers a reading of Arthur C. Danto’s Analytical Philosophy of History. For him, Danto’s book relies heavily on its positivist context, and this prevents Danto from understanding history as anything but a scientific explanation that presupposes laws. This does not allow Danto to understand what is the most characteristic feature of history, that is, that it presupposes a theory in order to observe facts.
Bibliographische Referenzen
- Ankersmith, Frank. (2012). Meaning, Truth, and Reference in Historical Representation. Cornell University Press.
- Danto, Arthur C.,Lassaque, Luisa Fernanda. (2014). Narración y conocimiento. Prometeo Libros. Buenos Aires.
- Geertz, Clifford. (2000). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Book. Nueva York.
- Hempel, Carl Gustav,Fassineti de Gallo, M.. (2005). La explicación científica. Estudios sobre filosofía de la ciencia. Paidós. Buenos Aires.
- Löwith, Karl. (1957). Meaning and History. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
- Murphy, M. G.. (1973). Our Knowledge of the Historical Past. University of Indianapolis. Indianápolis.
- Walsh, W. H.. (1970). Philosophy of History. An Introduction. Harper Torchbooks. Nueva York.
- Weber, Max,Almaraz, José. (1988). Ensayos de sociología de la religión. Taurus. Madrid.
- Weber, Max. (1988). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Mohr. Tubinga.