Planificación preparatoria digital en artroplastia total de cadera

  1. Andrés-Cano, P. 1
  2. Andrés-García, J.A. 2
  3. Chana-Rodríguez, F. 3
  4. Delgado-Martínez, A.D. 46
  5. Guerado, E. 5
  1. 1 Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
    info

    Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04vfhnm78

  2. 2 Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
    info

    Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/040xzg562

  3. 3 Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón
  4. 4 Hospital Universitario de Jaén
    info

    Hospital Universitario de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02ecxgj38

  5. 5 Hospital Universitario Costa del Sol
  6. 6 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Montrer des affiliations +
Revue:
Revista de la Sociedad Andaluza de Traumatología y Ortopedia

ISSN: 1578-9756

Année de publication: 2019

Volumen: 36

Número: 3

Pages: 9-28

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de la Sociedad Andaluza de Traumatología y Ortopedia

Résumé

Preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty is an essential step in order to reduce the incidence of complications and achieving consistent and reproducible clinical outcomes. Thanks to preoperative planning, the surgeon can identify surgical difficulties of the patient, anticipate specific implants or techniques, facilitates communication between surgical team and provides legal coverage.The introduction of digital radiology has been a real advance in the radiographic evaluation of patients. We find many clinical, educational and researchers benefits. It is necessary the use of a specific software and know the magnification of the digital radiograph to correctly perform preopera-tive techniques as well to perform measurements or place digital templates. To establish the magnification of the radiograph there are several calibration methods such as the use of markers or fixed magnification according to the anatomical region under study. In this paper, we perform a review of the current state of digital preoperative planning in hip arthroplasty, the advantages that its adequate realization provides to the surgeon and the technical resources that are necessary perform it regularly in a department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology.

Références bibliographiques

  • Allepuz AS-S, V; Espallargues, M; Sarria A. Hip and knee replacement in the Spanish National Health System. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. 2009; 53:290-299.
  • Della Valle AG, Padgett DE, Salvati EA. Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. JAmAcadOrthopSurg. 2005; 13:455-462.
  • Schmalzried TP. Preoperative templating and biomechanics in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2005; 28:s849-s851.
  • Berend KR, Sporer SM, Sierra RJ, Glassman AH, Morris MJ. Achieving stability and lower limb length in total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2011; 60:229-246.
  • Sculco PK, Cottino U, Abdel MP, Sierra RJ. Avoiding Hip Instability and Limb Length Discrepancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016; 47:327-334.
  • Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Soft tissue balancing: the hip. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17:17-22.
  • Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95:210-219.
  • McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77:865-869.
  • Clement ND, R SP-P, MacDonald D, Breusch SJ. Total hip replacement: increasing femoral offset improves functional outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016; 136:1317- 1323.
  • Mahoney CR, Pellicci PM. Complications in primary total hip arthroplasty: avoidance and management of dislocations. Instr Course Lect. 2003; 52:247-255.
  • Gonzalez DV, Comba F, Taveras N, Salvati EA. The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. IntOrthop. 2008; 32:289-294.
  • Tripuraneni KR, Archibeck MJ, Junick DW, Carothers JT, White RE. Common errors in the execution of preoperative templating for primary total hip arthroplasty. JArthroplasty. 2010; 25:1235-1239.
  • Whiddon DR, Bono JV, Lang JE, Smith EL, Salyapongse AK. Accuracy of digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. AmJOrthop (BelleMead NJ). 2011; 40:395-398.
  • Jassim SS, Ingham C, Keeling M, Wimhurst JA. Digital templating facilitates accurate leg length correction in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012; 78:344-349.
  • King RJ, Craig PR, Boreham BG, Majeed MA, Moran CG. The magnification of digital radiographs in the trauma patient: implications for templating. Injury. 2009; 40:173-176.
  • Bayne CO, Krosin M, Barber TC. Evaluation of the accuracy and use of x-ray markers in digital templating for total hip arthroplasty. JArthroplasty. 2009; 24:407-413.
  • Fitzgerald RH, Jr., Brindley GW, Kavanagh BF. The uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988:61-66.
  • Davidson D, Pike J, Garbuz D, Duncan CP, Masri BA. Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90:2000-2012.
  • The B, Diercks RL, van Ooijen PM, van Horn JR. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop. 2005; 76:78-84.
  • Kosashvili Y, Shasha N, Olschewski E, Safir O, White L, Gross A, et al. Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. CanJSurg. 2009; 52:6-11.
  • Berstock JR, Webb JC, Spencer RF. A comparison of digital and manual templating using PACS images. AnnRCollSurgEngl. 2010; 92:73-74.
  • Fridell K, Aspelin P, Fellander-Tsai L, Lundberg N. The effect of PACS on the practice of orthopaedic surgeons. J Telemed Telecare. 2011; 17:137-141.
  • White SP, Shardlow DL. Effect of introduction of digital radiographic techniques on pre-operative templating in orthopaedic practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005; 87:53-54.
  • Franken M, Grimm B, Heyligers I. A comparison of four systems for calibration when templating for total hip replacement with digital radiography. JBone Joint SurgBr. 2010; 92:136-141.
  • Wimsey S, Pickard R, Shaw G. Accurate scaling of digital radiographs of the pelvis. A prospective trial of two methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:1508-1512.
  • Heep H, Xu J, Lochteken C, Wedemeyer C. A simple and convenient method guide to determine the magnification of digital X-rays for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2012; 4:e12.
  • Sinclair VF, Wilson J, Jain NP, Knowles D. Assessment of accuracy of marker ball placement in pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29:1658-1660.
  • Heinert G, Hendricks J, Loeffler MD. Digital templating in hip replacement with and without radiological markers. JBone Joint SurgBr. 2009; 91:459-462.
  • King RJ, Makrides P, Gill JA, Karthikeyan S, Krikler SJ, Griffin DR. A novel method of accurately calculating the radiological magnification of the hip. JBone Joint SurgBr. 2009; 91:1217-1222.
  • Baxter JA, Barlow T, Karthikeyan S, Mayo DJ, King RJ. The accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using two different scale markers: a comparative study. HipInt. 2012; 22:82-89.
  • Archibeck MJ, Cummins T, Tripuraneni KR, Carothers JT, Murray-Krezan C, Hattab M, et al. Inaccuracies in the Use of Magnification Markers in Digital Hip Radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016.
  • Varghese B, Muthukumar N, Balasubramaniam M, Scally A. Reliability of measurements with digital radiographs--a myth. Acta OrthopBelg. 2011; 77:622-625.
  • Khan F, Ahmad T, Condon F, Lenehan B. Review of quality of x-rays for templating for total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015; 81:72-76.
  • Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, Kim YJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90 Suppl 4:47-66.
  • Weber M, Woerner ML, Springorum HR, Hapfelmeier A, Grifka J, Renkawitz TF. Plain radiographs fail to reflect femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29:1661-1665.
  • Meermans G, Malik A, Witt J, Haddad F. Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469:1677- 1682.
  • Moskal JT, Capps SG. Improving the accuracy of acetabular component orientation: avoiding malposition. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:286-296.
  • Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004; 22:815-821.
  • Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467:119-127.
  • Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006; 58:294-300.
  • Marx A, von Knoch M, Pfortner J, Wiese M, Saxler G. Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006; 126:487-492.
  • Boudriot U, Hilgert J, Hinrichs F. Determination of the rotational center of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006; 126:417-420.
  • Heaver C, St Mart JP, Nightingale P, Sinha A, Davis ET. Measuring limb length discrepancy using pelvic radiographs: the most reproducible method. Hip Int. 2013:0.
  • Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft- tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Course Lect. 2005; 54:131-141.
  • de Beer J, McKenzie S, Hubmann M, Petruccelli D, Winemaker M. Influence of cementless femoral stems inserted in varus on functional outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2006; 49:407-411.
  • Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:500-509.
  • Rosler J, Perka C. The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2000; 24:23-27.
  • Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:414-420.
  • Terrier A, Levrero Florencio F, Rudiger HA. Benefit of cup medialization in total hip arthroplasty is associated with femoral anatomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472:3159- 3165.
  • Young EY, Gebhart J, Cooperman D, Ahn NU. Are the left and right proximal femurs symmetric? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471:1593-1601.
  • Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016; 15:115.
  • Maini L, Sharma A, Jha S, Sharma A, Tiwari A. Three-dimensional printing and patient- specific pre-contoured plate: future of acetabulum fracture fixation? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016.
  • Mulford JS, Babazadeh S, Mackay N. Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: review of current and future applications. ANZ J Surg. 2016; 86:648-653.
  • Kim HN, Liu XN, Noh KC. Use of a real-size 3D-printed model as a preoperative and intraoperative tool for minimally invasive plating of comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10:91.
  • Zerr J, Chatzinoff Y, Chopra R, Estrera K, Chhabra A. Three-dimensional printing for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty revision: case report. Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 45:1431-1435.
  • Chana-Rodriguez F, Mananes RP, Rojo-Manaute J, Gil P, Martinez-Gomiz JM, Vaquero-Martin J. 3D surgical printing and pre contoured plates for acetabular fractures. Injury. 2016;47:2507-2511.
  • Shuang F, Hu W, Shao Y, Li H, Zou H. Treatment of Intercondylar Humeral Fractures With 3D-Printed Osteosynthesis Plates. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e2461.
  • Chung KJ, Hong DY, Kim YT, Yang I, Park YW, Kim HN. Preshaping plates for minimally invasive fixation of calcaneal fractures using a real-size 3D-printed model as a preoperative and intraoperative tool. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:1231-1236.
  • Marcucci M, Indelli PF, Latella L, Poli P, King D. A multimodal approach in total hip arthroplasty preoperative templating. Skeletal Ra
La source de données: Dialnet