Nuevos actores e innovaciones sociales para el desarrollo ruralel caso de las zonas periurbanas de Madrid y Guadalajara (España)

  1. Olga I. Mancha Cáceres 1
  2. Susana Ramírez García 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
AIBR: Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana

ISSN: 1578-9705

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 13

Número: 3

Páginas: 431-456

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.11156/AIBR.130307 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: AIBR: Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana

Resumen

In the last years, new forms of commercialisation through short supply chains have been emerging and taking shape. In these new forms, the traditional economic agents act together with social agents. New citizenship is arising and begins to organise itself, carrying us to an interest in its forms of action, and on the nature of its propositions. One aspect of these renewed actions consists in the reconstruction of connection throughout food producers participating in “Short Food Supply Chains” (SFSCs). That implies multiple dimensions, such as those linked with productive activities, territorial articulation, and with the emergence of new social links based on trust. The present paper aims to highlight the intermediaries’ strategies and the agency of SFSCs actors, analysing the social and economic dynamics they generate, and their role in the construction of consumer’s new connections with the rural spaces.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Parlamento Europeo y Consejo de la Unión Europea (2013). REGULATION (EU) No 1303/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. Official Journal of the European Union. L 347/320 En: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32013R1303. Accedido el 9 de abril de 2018.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anthopoulou, T. (Ed.) (2012). Urban Agriculture. Social inclusion and sustainable city. Case study of two municipal vegetable gardens in Northern Greece. Athens: Panteion University.
  • Aubry, C. y Chiffoleau, Y. (2009). Le développement des circuits courts et l’agriculture périurbaine: histoire, evolution en cours et questions actuelles. Innovations agronomiques, 5: 53-67.
  • Blay-Palmer, A. (2011). Foodhubs: Growing community based solutions for sustainable, local food systems. Sustainable Local Food Systems Policy Brief. Ottawa, Canada: Carleton University.
  • Calle, A.; Soler, M., y Vara, I. (2009). La desafección al sistema agroalimentario: ciudadanía y redes sociales. Comunicación presentada en I Congreso Español de la Alimentación, Gijón 28-29 de mayo de 2009.
  • Ciolos, D. (2012). Agriculturas locales y circuitos de comercialización cortos: reforzar la dimensión local de la Política Agrícola Común. Comunicación presentada en Conferencia Agricultura Local y Circuitos de Comercialización Cortos. SPEECH/12/283.
  • Connelly, S.; Markey, S. y Roseland, M. (2011). Bridging sustainability and the social economy: Achieving community transformation through local food initiatives. Critical Social Policy, 31(2): 308-324.
  • Ehne Bizkaia (2012). Circuitos Cortos de comercialización en Euskal Herria. Vitoria: Mundubat.
  • Parlamento Europeo y Consejo de la Unión Europea (2013). REGULATION (EU) No 1303/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
  • European Union, European Commission, Bureau of European Policy Advisers (BEPA) (2010). Empowering people, driving change, social innovation in the European Union, Luxembourg: EUR-OP. En https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/index.cfm?action=- media.download&uuid=2A18225B-A4EF-443D-9D074439D071447D. Accedido el 8 de abril de 2018.
  • Guzmán, G.I.; González de Molina, M. y Sevilla, E. (2000). Introducción a la Agroecología como Desarrollo Rural Sostenible. Madrid: Mundi Prensa.
  • Kneafsey, M.; Venn, L.; Schmutz, U.; Balázs, B.; Trenchard, L.; Eyden-Wood, T.; Bos, E.; Sutton, G. y Blackett, M. (2013). Short Food Supply Chains and Local Food Systems in the EU. A State of Play of their Socio-Economic Characteristics. Report EUR 25911. JCR Scientific and Policy Reports. European Commission.
  • Le Clanche, J.F. y Pluvinage, J. (2011). Innovations alternatives en agriculture: des initiatives à qualifier. POUR, 12: 31-38.
  • Lemke, H. (2011). «Der Mensch ist, was er isst.» Ludwig Feuerbach als Vordenker der Gastrosophie. EPIKUR-Journal für Gastrosophie, 1: 1-12.
  • López García, D. y Llorente Sánchez, M. (2010). La agroecología: hacia un nuevo modelo agrario. Sistema agroalimentario, producción ecológica y consumo responsable. Madrid: Ecologistas en Acción.
  • Marsden, T.K. (2004). The quest for ecological modernisation: re-spacing rural development and agri-food Studies. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(2): 129-146.
  • Méndez, R. (2015). Redes de colaboración y economía alternativa para la resiliencia urbana: una agenda de investigación. Biblio 3W. Revista bibliográfica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, XX(1139).
  • Montenegro de Wit, M. e Iles, A. (2016). Toward thick legitimacy: Creating a web of legitimacy for Agroecology. Elem Sci Anth.; 4: 115.
  • Norgaard, R.B. (1994). Development Betrayed: the end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future. New York: Routledge.
  • Otsuki, K. (2015). Transformative sustainable development: participation, reflection and change. New York: Routledge.
  • Ploeg, J.D. van der; Renting, H.; Brunori, G.; Knickel, K.; Mannion, J.; Marsden, T.K.; De Roest, K.; Sevilla-Guzmán, E. y Ventura, F. (2000). Rural development: from practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4): 391-408.
  • Renting, H.; Rossing, W.A.H.; Groot, J.C.J.; Ploeg, J.D. van der; Laurent, C.; Perraud, D.; Stobbelaar, D.J.; y Van Ittersum, M.K. (2009). Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J. Environ. Manage, 90: S112-S123.
  • Roch, F. (2017). Otra historia es posible. En Urbanismo, alimentación y espacios agrarios. Rochetal, Instituto Juan de Herrera, 3-8 (en prensa).
  • Sayadi, S.; Bertuglia, A.; Parra-López, C., y Guarino, A. (2010). El papel de los neorrurales en el desarrollo rural sostenible de la Alpujarra. CEDDAR: Informes, 16(1).
  • Sevilla, G., y Soler, M. (2009). Del desarrollo rural a la agroecología. Hacia un cambio de paradigma. Documentación social 155: 25-41.
  • Sevilla Guzmán, E. (2006). De la sociología rural a la agroecología. Barcelona: Icaria.
  • Turner, V.W. (1974). Drama, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Cornell University Press.
  • Wellman, B. y Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities. Approaches to the Study of the Community Question. Urban Affairs Review, 14(3): 363-390.
  • Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository. File: Guadalajara in Spain (plus Canarias).svg. (2015, January 2). En https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Guadalajara_ in_Spain_(plus_Canarias).svg&oldid=145110044. Accedido el 10 de abril de 2018.
  • Wilson, G. (2010). Multifunctional ‘quality’ and rural community resilience. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(3): 364-381.
  • Wiskerke, J.S.C. (2009). On Places Lost and Places Regained: Reflections on the Alternative Food Geography and Sustainable Regional Development. International Planning Studies, 14(4).
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet