A influência de variáveis contextuais e situacionais na classificação de árbitros de futebol de elite

  1. Carvalho, Vitor 1
  2. Esteves, Pedro Tiago 2
  3. Nunes, Célia 3
  4. Mendez, César 4
  5. Travassos, Bruno 5
  1. 1 Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
  2. 2 Department of Sport Sciences, Polytechnic Institute of Guarda, Portugal; Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, Portugal
  3. 3 Department of Mathematics and Center of Mathematics and Applications, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
  4. 4 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid; Universidad Computense de Madrid, Madrid
  5. 5 Department of Sport Sciences, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal; Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, Portugal; Portugal Football School, Portuguese Football federation, FPF, Oeiras, Portugal
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1578-8423,  1989-5879

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 21

Número: 1

Páginas: 216-224

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/CPD.435081 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

Resumen

Objetivo: Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo evaluar la relación entre la clasificación de árbitros de fútbol de élite y las variables contextuales y situacionales que caracterizan los juegos de árbitrados durante la temporada deportiva. Para ello se realizó una regresión ordinal con función Link Logit entre la clasificación final y las variables contextuales y situacionales. Las variables contextuales tuvieron un efecto significativo en la clasificación final, sin efectos significativos de las variables situacionales, en la clasificación de los árbitros al final de la temporada deportiva. En general, el modelo se ha revelado como estadísticamente significativo. La probabilidad de obtener una mejor clasificación final de los árbitros aumenta 54,2% con el incremento del número de partidos jugados en La Liga, y 24,8% con el incremento del número de partidos equilibrados. Disminuye 61,2% con partidos jugados sin equipos Top 3. Los resultados refuerzan la influencia significativa que los factores contextuales tienen en la clasificación y evaluación de un árbitro al final de la temporada deportiva.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Este estudo foi suportado pela Fundação para Ciência e Tecnologia com o número de registo UID04045/2020 para os autores PTE e BT.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Askins, R. (2001). Common myths about officiating. Referee,26(10),44-47.
  • Ato, M., López, J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
  • Berry, J., Abernethy, B., & Cote, J. (2008). The contribution of structured activity and deliberate play to the development of expert perceptual and decision-making skill. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30 (6), 685–708. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.6.685
  • Brand, R., Schmidt, G., & Schneeloch Y. (2006). “Sequential Effects in Elite Basketball Referees’ Foul Decisions: Na Experimental Study on the Concept of Game Management.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 28, 93–99. https://doi:10.1123/jsep.28.1.93.
  • Buraimo, B., Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. (2010). The 12th man?: refereeing bias in English and German soccer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 173 (2), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00604.x
  • Buraimo, B., Simmons, R., & Maciaszczyk, M. (2012). Favoritism and referee bias in european soccer: evidence from the spanish league and the uefa champions league. Contemporary Economic Policy, 30 (3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00295.x
  • Catteeuw, P., Helsen, W. F., Gilis, B., & Wagemans, J. (2009). Decision-making skills, role specificity, and deliberate practice in association football refereeing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 1125– 1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903079179
  • Collina, P. (2003). The rules of the game. London: Macmillan
  • Dohmen, T., Sauermann, J. (2016). Referee bias. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30 (4), 679-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12106
  • Dosseville, F., Laborde, S., & Bernier, M. (2014). Athletes' expectations with regard to officiating competence. European Journal of Sport Science, 14 (1), 448-pp455. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2012.713006
  • Elsworthy, N., Burke, D. Scott, B. Stevens, C., & Dascombe, B. (2014). “Physical and Decision-Making Demands of Australian Football Umpires during Competitive Matches.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28 (12), 3502–3507. https://doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000567.
  • Erikstad, M. K., & Johansen, B. T. (2020). Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty Situations. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2(19). https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00019
  • Folkesson, P., Nyberg, C., Archer, T., & Norlander, T. (2002). Soccer referees’ experience of threat and agression: effects of age, experience, and life orientation on outcome of coping strategy. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.90028
  • Fruchart, E., Carton, A. (2012). How do amateur soccer referees destabilize a match? Psicológica, 33 (3), 435-449.
  • Guillén, F., & Jiménez, H. (2001). Características deseables en el arbitraje y el juicio deportivo. Revista De Psicologia Del Deporte, 10 (1), 23-34.
  • Grunska, J. (2001). “Yeah, You’re Good…But You Can Be Better.” Referee 26 (6), 36–40.
  • Lex, H., Pizzera, A., Kurtes, M. & Schack, T. (2015). Influence of players “vocalisations on soccer referes” decisions. European Journal of Sport Science, 15 (5), 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.962620
  • Helsen, W., & Bultynck, J. -B. (2004). Physical and perceptual-cognitive demands of topclass refereeing in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22 (2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410310001641502
  • Jones, M.V., Paull, G.V., & Erskine, J. (2002). The impact of team’s aggressive reputation on the decisions of association football referees. Journal of Sport Sciences, 20, 991-1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102321011751
  • Kittela, A., Larkina, P., Elsworthy, N., &, Spittle, M. (2019). Video-based testing in sporting officials: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 43, 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.03.013
  • Mathers, J. F., & Brodie, K. (2011). Elite refereeing in professional soccer: A case study of mental skills support. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 2 (3), 171–182. https://doi:10.1080/21520704.2011.609018.
  • Mascarenhas, D., Collins, D., & Mortimer, P. (2005). Elite refereeing performance: Developing a model for sport science support. The Sport Psychologist, 19, 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.19.4.364
  • Mascarenhas, D., O’Hare D., & Plessner H. (2006). The psychological and performance demands of association football refereeing. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 37, 99-120.
  • Morris, G., & Connor D. (2016). Key attributes of expert NRL referes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35 (9), 852-857. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1194524
  • Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (2002). The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 261–272. https://doi:10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00033-4.
  • Pina J. A., Passos A. M., Carvalho, H., & Maynard M. T. (2019). To be or not to be an excellent football referee: Different experts’ viewpoints. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37 (6), 692-700. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1522940
  • Plessner H., & Betsch, T. (2001). Sequential effects in important referee decisions: The case of penalties in soccer. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 23, 254-259.
  • Plessner, H., & Raab, M. (1999). Kampf- und Schiedsdchterurteile als Produkte sozialer Informations verarbeitung [Judgments by officials in sports as products of social information processing]. Psychologie & Sport, 6, 130-145.
  • Sabatini, D. (2002). The search for excellence. Referee, 24-28.
  • Sülün, Ö., (2013). Comparison of Anger and Furiousness Levels of Soccer Referees with Their Empathetic Tendencies. Master’s Thesis. Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey University, Institute of Social Sciences, Karaman.
  • Tenreiro-Gavela, F., Montero-Seone, A., & Saavedra-García, M. (2016). La autopercepción del esfuerzo y recuperación en el arbitraje profesional español: un estudio de caso. Cuadernos De Psicología Del Deporte, 16(3), 137-144.
  • Urra, B., Nuñez, C., Oses, J., & Sarmiento, G. (2018). Variables psicológicas influyentes en el desempeño de árbitros FIFA: un estudio cualitativo. Revista de Psicología Aplicada al Deporte y al Ejercicio Físico, 3(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5093/rpadef2018a13
  • Weaver, P. (2001). No hiding place for Gallagher. The Guardian Unlimited. Monday November 12th. Electronic article retrieved from http://football.guardian.co.uk/Match_Report/0,591738,00.html.
  • Williams, M., & Ericsson, A. (2005). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Human Movement Science, 24 (3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.002
  • Wilson, R. (Producer & Director) (2000, July 25). Man in black. Scotland: British Broadcasting Corporation.
  • Wolfson, S., & Neave, N. (2007). Coping under pressure: Cognitive strategies for maintaining confidence among soccer referees. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30, 232–247.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet