Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace

  1. Maribondo Albuquerque, Iara 1
  2. Rosas Torres, Ana Raquel 2
  3. Álvaro Estramiana, José Luis 3
  4. Garrido Luque, Alicia 3
  1. 1 Universidade Federal da Paraíba / Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  2. 2 Universidade Federal da Paraíba
    info

    Universidade Federal da Paraíba

    João Pessoa, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/00p9vpz11

  3. 3 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Revista Colombiana de Psicología

ISSN: 0121-5469

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 29

Número: 2

Páginas: 13-24

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15446/RCP.V29N2.80004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Colombiana de Psicología

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar la influencia de los estereotipos en la discriminación contra la mujer. Específicamente, se investigó los efectos del género candidato (hombre frente a mujer); el estado con respecto al permiso parental (ejercicio del derecho frente a la renuncia al derecho) y los estereotipos de competencia, sociabilidad y moralidad sobre esta discriminación. De acuerdo con estudios anteriores, el género de los candidatos y el estado de licencia parental interactúan e influyen juntos en la discriminación contra las mujeres (Estudio 1, F(1, 229) =22.45, p<.001). A su vez, la triple interacción del género candidato, el estado de licencia parental y las tres dimensiones de los estereotipos (Estudio 2, F(4, 587)=2.73, p=.030, ƞ²=.018) revelaron que la mujer que tomó la licencia de paternidad se evaluó de manera más positiva en las tres dimensiones estereotipadas, en comparación con la mujer que renunció a su derecho a la licencia quien, al mismo tiempo, se evaluó de manera más pobre en la dimensión de competencia en comparación con el hombre que ejerce el mismo derecho (Estudio 2, N=312). Cómo citar este artículo: Albuquerque, I. M., Torres, A. R. R., Álvaro-Estramiana, J. L., & Garrido-Luque, A. (2020). Procesos Psicosociales de Discriminación contra la Mujer en el Lugar de Trabajo. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(2), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1544/rcp.v29n2.80004

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albiston, C. (2007). Institutional Perspectives on Law, Work, and Family. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112803
  • Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty. Gender & Society, 24, 616–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210383142
  • Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744
  • Burgess, N. (2013). The Motherhood Penalty: How Gender and Parental Status Influence Judgements of Job-Related Competence and Organizational Commitment. Seminar Research Paper Series, Paper 32. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/lrc_paper_series/32/?utm_source=digitalcommons.uri.edu%2Flrc_paper_series%2F32&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
  • Bygren, M., Erlandsson, A., & Gähler, M. (2017). Do employers prefer fathers? Evidence from a field experiment testing the gender by parenthood interaction effect on callbacks to job applications. European Sociological Review, 33, 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx051
  • Castillo-Mayén, R., & Montes-Berges, B. (2014). Analysis of Current Gender Stereotypes. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1044-1060. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.138981
  • Connor, R. A., Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2016). Ambivalent Sexism in the Twenty-First Century. In C. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice, 295 – 320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297-1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799
  • Cuadrado, I., López-Rodríguez, L., & Navas, M. (2016). La perspectiva de la minoría: estereotipos y emociones entre grupos inmigrantes. Anales de Psicología, 32, 535-544. http://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.2.205341
  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x
  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.P., …., & Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X314935
  • Cundiff, J. L., & Vescio, T. K. (2016). Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace. Sex Roles, 75, 126 – 138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0593-2
  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender,123-174. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275 – 298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
  • Etaugh, C., & Folger, D. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018850404838
  • Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  • Flaquer, L., & Escobedo, A. (2014). Licencias parentales y política social de la paternidad en España. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 32, 69-99. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CRLA.2014.v32.n1.44714
  • Garrido-Luque, A., Álvaro-Estramiana, J. L., & Rosas-Torres, A. R. (2018). Estereotipos de género, maternidad y empleo: un análisis psicológico, Pensando Psicología, 14. https://doi.org/10.16925/pe.v14i23.2261
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109 – 118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
  • Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544212
  • González, M. J., Cortina, C., & Rodríguez, J. (2019). The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Hiring: A Field Experiment. European Sociological Review, 35, 187 -204. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy055
  • Gungor, G., & Biernat, M. (2009). Gender Bias or Motherhood Disadvantage? Judgments of Blue Collar Mothers and Fathers in the Workplace. Sex Roles, 60, 232- 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9540-1
  • Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, (32), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
  • Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same Behavior, different consequences: Reactions to Men’s and Women’s Altruistic Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431
  • Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189
  • Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2011). Gender-fair language in job advertisements and hiring decisions. In S. Sczesny (Chair), Gender-fair language use from a social psychological perspective. Symposium conducted at the 16th General meeting of the European association of social psychology, Stockholm.
  • Johansson, E. (2010). The effect of own and spousal parental leave on earnings, IFAU Working Paper 2010:4. ifau – Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Swedish Ministry of Employment. Uppsala, Sweden. Accessed May 1, 2017: http://www.ifau.se/ ISSN 1651-1166
  • Kricheli-Katz, T. (2012). Choice, Discrimination, and Motherhood Penalty. Law & Society Review, 46, 557–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00506.x
  • Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
  • Livermore, T., Rodgers, J., & Siminski, P. (2011). The Effect of Motherhood on Wages and Wage Growth: Evidence for Australia. The Economic Record, 87, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00745.x
  • López-Rodríguez, L., Cuadrado, I., & Navas, M. (2013). Extended application of the Stereotype Content Model (scm) towards three immigrant groups in Spain. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913806751375
  • Lyness, K. S., & Judiesch, M. K. (2014). Gender egalitarianism and work–life balance for managers: Multisource perspectives in 36 countries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63, 96-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12011
  • Michinov, N., Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., & Méot, A. (2005). Social dominance orientation, prejudice, and discrimination: A new computer-based method for studying discriminatory behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206402
  • Morales, M. & Aguirre, E. (2018). Involucramiento parental basado en el hogar y desempeño académico en la adolescencia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 27, 137-160. https://doi.org/10.15446/ rcp.v27n2.66212
  • Pedregosa, P. R., & Díaz, R. M. (2016). Sexismo hostil y benevolente en adolescentes. Una aproximación étnico-cultural. Género y Educación, 72, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie72126
  • Pereira, M., Álvaro, J. L. & Garrido, A. (2016). Procesos de esencialización de hombres y mujeres: Un estudio comparado Brasil-España. Anales de psicología, 32(1), 190-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.190841
  • Plickert, G., & Sterling, J. (2017). Gender still matters: Effects of workplace discrimination on employment schedules of young professionals. Laws, 6, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6040028
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personal variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  • Sterling, J., & Reichman, N. (2016). Overlooked and Undervalued: Women in Private Law Practice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12, 373–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121705
  • Sullivan, C. (2015). ‘Bad Mum Guilt’: the representation of ‘work-life balance’ in UK women’s magazines. Community, Work & Family, 18, 284-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2014.970128
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet