Autoevaluación y toma de decisiones para mejorar la competencia oral en Educación Secundaria

  1. Marta Gràcia 1
  2. Jesús M. Alvarado 2
  3. Silvia Nieva 2
  1. 1 Universitat de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/021018s57

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica

ISSN: 1135-3848

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 1

Número: 62

Páginas: 83-99

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica

Resumen

La incorporación en los centros educativos de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (TIC) supone una gran oportunidad para la formación de los docentes, así como para el desarrollo de competencias por parte del alumnado. En la presente investigación se utiliza un Sistema Inteligente de Asistencia Pedagógica (SIAP) diseñado para formar al docente, ayudándole a diseñar sus clases, autoevaluando el progreso respecto a distintos hitos para lograr clases más participativas que fomenten la competencia oral del alumnado. El SIAP fue utilizado durante diez semanas en un diseño experimental con grupo control: 188 estudiantes de Educación Secundaria, 84 grupo intervención y 104 grupo comparación. Los indicadores que incluye mostraron cómo, a medida que se lograban los hitos docentes, mejoraba la competencia oral del alumnado. Complementariamente, en un cuestionario se observó un cambio positivo en el grupo de intervención en el autoconcepto del alumnado sobre distintas habilidades comunicativas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2016). A critical analysis of decision support systems research. In L. P. Willcokcs, C. L. P. Sauer, & M. C. Lacity (Eds.), Formulating research methods for information systems (pp. 127-168). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509857
  • Ausubel, D. (2000). The adquisition and retention of knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9454-7 Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • Berson, Y., Halevy, N. Shamir, B., & Erez, M. (2015). Leading from different psychological distances: A construal-level perspective on vision communication, goal setting, and follower motivation. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2),143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.011
  • Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2015). Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in Teaching of English, 49(3), 272-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.597861
  • Cáceres Serrano, P., & Alvarado Izquierdo, J. M. (2019). Evaluación de la comprensión lectora mediante un modelo de diagnóstico cognitivo. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 2(51), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP51.2.11
  • Campos, I., Colón, M. J., Sampériz (2021). Diseño de un cuestionario para valorar la competencia en comunicación oral del alumnado de Magisterio. Educação & Formação, 6 (1), e3490-e3490. https://doi.org/10.25053/redufor.v6i1.3490
  • Capa‐Aydin, Y., Sungur, S., & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2009). Teacher self‐regulation: Examining a multidimensional construct. Educational Psychology, 29(3), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410902927825
  • Cartwright, L. (2011). How consciously reflective are you? In D. McGregor, & L. Cartwright (Eds.), Developing reflective practice: A guide for beginning teachers (pp. 55-68). McGraw-Hill Education. https://bit.ly/34dTWeE
  • Cerda, J., & Villarroel, L. (2008). Evaluación de la concordancia inter-observador en investigación pediátrica: Coeficiente de Kappa. Revista Chilena De Pediatría, 79(1), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0370- 41062008000100008
  • Chatzistamatiou, M., Dermitzaki, I., & Bagiatis, V. (2014). Self-regulatory teaching in mathematics: Relations to teachers' motivation, affect and professional commitment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(2), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0199-9
  • Clarke, S. N., Resnick, L. B., & Penstein-Rosé, C. (2016). Dialogic instruction: A new frontier. In L. Corno, & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 378-389). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688244
  • Coll, C. (2010). Enseñar y aprender, construir y compartir: Procesos de aprendizaje y ayuda educativa. In C. Coll (Ed.), Desarrollo, aprendizaje y enseñanza en la educación secundaria (pp. 31-61). Graó. https://bit.ly/3yvzy6N
  • Compton, L. K. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/095882208026138
  • Fainholc, B., Nervi, H., Romero, R., & Halal, C. (2013). Teacher training and pedagogical use of ICT [La formación del profesorado y el uso pedagógico de las TIC]. RED Revista de Educación a Distancia, 38, 1-14. https://bit.ly/2T8tfpz
  • Gewerc, A., & Montero, L. (2015). Professional knowledge and digital competence in teacher education. The case of the Master Degree in Primary Education [Conocimiento profesional y competencia digital en la formación del profesorado. El caso del Grado de Maestro en Educación Primaria]. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 14(1), 31-43. https://bit.ly/3wpVEG4
  • Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.009
  • Gràcia, M., Galván-Bovaira, M. J., Sánchez-Cano, M., Vega, F., Vilaseca, R., & Rivero, M. (2015a). Valoración de la enseñanza de la lengua oral. Escala EVALOE. Graó.
  • Gràcia, M., Vega, F., & Galván-Bovaira, M. J. (2015b). Developing and testing EVALOE: A tool for assessing spoken language teaching and learning in the classroom. Child Language Teaching Therapy, 31(3), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659015593608
  • Gràcia, M., & Lacerda, C. (2019). La formación de maestros y la promoción de la competencia comunicativa de alumnos sordos. Revista Educação Especial, 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1984686X48495
  • Gràcia, M., Casanovas, J., Riba, C., Sancho, M.R., Jarque, J., Casanovas, J. & Vega, F. (2020a). Developing a digital application (EVALOEDSS) for the professional development of teachers aiming to improve their students’ linguistic competence. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.17076 90
  • Gràcia, M., Jarque, M.J., Riba, C., & Vega, F. (2020b). Uso de una herramienta digital como recurso de desarrollo profesional para mejorar la competencia comunicativa oral de alumnos de educación infantil y primaria. Revista de investigación en Logopedia, 10(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.5209/rlog.67125
  • Gràcia, M., Jarque, J., Astals, M., & Rouaz, K. (2020c). Desarrollo y evaluación de la competencia comunicativa en la formación inicial de maestros. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 11(30), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.202 0.30.591
  • Gràcia, M., Vega, F., Bitencourt, D., Vinyoles, N., & Jarque, M.J. (2021a). Retos en la formación inicial de profesorado de infantil y primaria: La competencia oral. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 26(88), 195-224. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/173311
  • Gràcia, M., Vega, F., Jarque, S., Adam, A. L., & Jarque, J. (2021b). Teaching practices for developing oral language skills in Catalan schools. Cogent Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1935647
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hughes, J. E., Liu, S., & Lim, M. (2016). Technological modeling: Faculty use of technologies in preservice teacher education from 2004 to 2012. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 184-207. https://bit.ly/3fcS5gJ
  • Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
  • James, M., & McCormick, R. (2009). Teachers learning how to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(7), 973-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.023
  • Jiménez Blanco, A., Sastre Llorente, S., Artola González, T., & Alvarado Izquierdo, J. M. (2020). Inteligencia emocional y rendimiento académico: Un modelo evolutivo. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 3(56), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP56.3.10
  • Koh, L. H. (2019). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 577-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5
  • Könings, K. D., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2015). Bringing learning to the workplace: A smartphone app for reflection and increased authenticity of learning. In A. Dailey-Hebert, & K. S. Dennis, (Eds.), Transformative perspectives and processes in higher education (pp. 117-135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09247-8_7
  • Marope, M., Griffin, P., & Gallagher, C. (2017). Future competences and the future of currículum. A global reference for curricula transformation UNESCO-IBE. https://bit.ly/2XzeZXf
  • Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
  • Mercer, N., Marion, J., & Warwick, P. (2020). Oracy education. En N. Mercer, R. Wegerif and L. Major (eds.). The Routledge International handbook of research on Dialogic Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441677
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A methods sourcebook (3a ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Mosley-Wetzel, M., Maloch, B., & Homan, J. V. (2017). Retrospective video analysis: A reflective tool for teachers and teacher educators. The Reading Teacher, 70(5), 533- 542. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1550
  • Millard, W., & Menzies, L. (2016) The State of Speaking in our Schools. Voice 21/LKMco. Molinari, L., & Mameli, C. (2013). Process quality of classroom discourse: Pupil participation and learning opportunities. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.05.003
  • Nami, F., Marandi, S. S., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2016). CALL teacher professional growth through lesson study practice: An investigation into EFL teachers’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 658-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016439
  • Paredes, J., Guitert, M., & Avi, B. (2015). Innovation and educational technology as the basis of initial teacher education for the renewal of teaching. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 14(1), 101-114.https://bit.ly/3wsofdL
  • Persico, D., Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). The interplay between self-regulated professional learning and teachers’ workpractice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2481-2486. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.590
  • Pozo, J. L. (2020). La educación está desnuda. Lo que deberíamos aprender de la escuela confinada. SM. https://bit.ly/3fEm0gJ
  • Prieto, L. P., Magnuson, P., Dillenbourg, P., & Saar, M. (2017). Reflection for action: Designing tools to support teacher reflection on everyday evidence. https://bit.ly/34a5U9u
  • Reid, D. A., Simmt, E., Savard, A., Suurtamm, C., Manuel, D., Lin, T. W. J., … Knipping, C. (2015). Observing observers: Using video to prompt and record reflections on teachers’ pedagogies in four regions of Canada. Research in Comparative and International Education, 10(3), 367-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499915580425
  • Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446- 456. https://doi.org/10.1002/ TRTR.01066
  • Romano, M., & Schwartz, J. (2005). Exploring technology as a tool for eliciting and encouraging beginning teacher reflection. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 149-168. https://bit.ly/2SnEdaf
  • Romero, M., Guardia, L., Guitert, M., & Sangra, A. (2014). Teachers’ professional development through learning ecologies: What are the experts views? En A. M. Teixeira & A. Szucs (Eds.), Challenges for research into open & distance learning, conference proceedings eight EDEN research workshop (pp. 27-36). EDEN. https://doi.org/10.38069/edenconf-2014-rw0004
  • RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/.
  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
  • Sedlacek, M., & Sedova, K. (2016). How many are talking? The role of collectivity in dialogic teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.001
  • Sedova (2017). A case study of a transition to dialogic teaching as a process of gradual change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 278-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.018
  • Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., Salamounova, Z. (2019). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.10 1217
  • Smagorinsky, P., Shelton, S. A., & Moore, C. (2015). The role of reflexion in developing eupraxis in learning to teach English. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(4), 25-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1067146
  • Son, J. B. (2018). Teacher development in technology-enhanced language teaching. Palmgrave Macmillan.
  • Thorn, C. (2002). Data Use in the Classroom: The Challenges of Implementing Data-based Decision-making at the School Level. University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
  • Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005
  • van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W. F., & Schenke, W. (2019). Approaches to coconstruction of knowledge in teacher learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.019
  • Van Beek, J. A., De Jong, F. P. C. M., Minnaert, A. E. M. G., & Wubbels, T. (2014). Teacher practice in secondary vocational education: Between teacher-regulated activities of student learning and student selfregulation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.005
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Walsh, S. (2003). Developing interactional awareness in the second language classroom through teacher self-evaluation. Language Awareness, 12(2), 124-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410308667071
  • Wells, G. (2009). The meaning makers: Learning to talk and talking to learn (2nd edition). Multilingual Matters.
  • Wong, L., Chai, C. S., & Aw, G. P. (2017). Seamless language learning: Second language learning with social media. Comunicar, 50, 9- 21. https://doi.org/10.3916/C50-2017-01
  • Wurth, J. G. R., Tigelaar, E. H., Hulshof, H., de Jong, J. C., & Admiraal, W. F. (2019). Key elements of L1-oral language teaching and learning in secondary education. A literature review. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 19, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL2019.19.01.15