Online snacks shoppingthe influence of packaging design in product expectations

  1. Diana Gavilan 1
  2. Susana Fernández-Lores 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 ESIC
Journal:
ESIC Digital Economy & Innovation Journal

ISSN: 2792-8721

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 1

Issue: 1

Pages: 104-119

Type: Article

DOI: 10.55234/EDEIJ-1-1-005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: ESIC Digital Economy & Innovation Journal

Abstract

The growth of online food shopping along with the increasing interest of consumers in adopting healthy eating habits highlights the need to deepen the decision-making process in the online purchase of healthy food. The aim of this paper is to analyze the impact of extrinsic cues –packaging background color and ingredients description– on consumers’ sensory and hedonic expectations of healthy snacks and consequently on purchase intention. The moderating role of consumer design sensitivity has been taken into consideration. For this purpose, a 2x2 full factorial online experiment was conducted with a sample (N = 221) of Spanish consumers recruited through social media. The results partially supported the hypotheses stated. Results show that in the healthy snack category, extrinsic cues can create expectations about what the product consumption experience will be like. These expectations contribute to stimulate purchase intention. In some cases, consumer’s design sensitivity can be considered a moderating factor in the shaping of sensory expectations emerging from packaging. This study helps us to understand the decision-making process in the online purchase of certain food items by focusing on the product exhibition during the search stage. It also discusses managerial implications addressed to healthy snacks firms about packaging design when selling online. The study stresses the usefulness of sensory research as a necessary tool to support the marketing of online products.

Bibliographic References

  • Adaval, R., Saluja, G. & Jiang, Y. (2019). Seeing and thinking in pictures: A review of visual information processing. Consumer Psychology Review, 2, 50–69. doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1049
  • Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361–391. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
  • Amplifly Snacks Brands (2017). Better-For-You Snacks: The New Snacking Reality. Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/y2tup2qz
  • Asam, E. H. & Bucklin, L. P. (1973). Nutrition labeling for canned goods: A study of consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 37 (April), 32-37. doi.org/10.1177/002224297303700207
  • Barlow, H. (2001). The exploitation of regularities in the environment by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Research, 24, 602–607. doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000024
  • BCFN (2012). Eating in 2030: trends and perspectives. Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/y4x2hehe
  • Becker, L., van Rompay, T. J. L., Schifferstein, H. N. J. & Galetzka, M. (2011). Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, 22, 17–23. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.06.007
  • Bloch, P. H., Brunel, F. F. & Arnold, T. J. (2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 551–565.
  • Bryła, P. (2018). Organic food online shopping in Poland. British Food Journal, 120(5), 1015–1027. doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2017-0517
  • Childers, T. L. & Houston, M. J. (1984). Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 11,643–654. doi.org/10.1086/209001
  • Dubé, L. & Cantin, I. (2000). Promoting health or promoting pleasure? A contingency approach to the effect of informational and emotional appeals on food liking and consumption. Appetite, 35, 251–262. doi.org/10.1006/appe.2000.0361
  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1980). Predicting and understanding consumer behavior: Attitude-behavior correspondence. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, eds. Icek Ajzen and Martin Fishbein, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 148–172.
  • Fricker, R. D. & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field methods, 14(4), 347–367. doi.org/10.1177/152582202237725
  • Goldman, J. (2021). (More) digital trends for 2021: The future of grocery is digital en E-marketer. Retrieved from: https://www.emarketer.com/content/more-digital-trends-2021-future-of-grocery-digital
  • Google (2019). Healthy Food and Brands. Retrieved from: http://media.enfasis.com/adjuntos/146/documentos/000/133/0000133157.pdf
  • Hurgobin, Y., Le Floch, V. & Lemercier, C. (2020). Effect of multiple extrinsic cues on consumers’ willingness to buy apples: A scenario-based study. Food Quality and Preference, 81, 103860. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103860
  • IRI (2020). Snacking Survey -2020. Retrieved from: https://www.sweetpress.com/tag/informe-aperitivos-2020/
  • Jaeger, S. R. & MacFie, H. J. H. (2001). The effect of advertising format and mean send information of consumer expectations for apples. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 189–205. doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00044-6
  • Jai, T. M., O’Boyle, M. W. & Fang, D. (2014). Neural correlates of sensory‐enabling presentation: An fMRI study of image zooming and rotation video effects on online apparel shopping. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13, 342–350. doi: 10.1002/cb.1476
  • Kähkönen, P., Tuorila, H. & Rita, H. (1996). How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread. Food Quality and Preference, 7(2), 87–94. doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(95)00040-2
  • Katzeff, C., Milestad, R., Zapico, J. L. & Bohné, U. (2020). Encouraging organic food consumption through visualization of personal shopping data. Sustainability, 12(9), 3599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093599
  • Lembcke, T.-B., Engelbrecht, N., Willnat, M. & Lichtenberg, S. (2020). Behavioral Design in Online Supermarkets: How Virtual Shopping Cart Functions Impact Sustainable Consumption. AMCIS 2020 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2020/sig_hci/sig_hci/2
  • Liang, P., Roy, S., Chen, M.-L. & Zhang, G.-H. (2013). Visual influence of shapes and semantic familiarity on human sweet sensitivity. Behavioural Brain Research, 253, 42–47. doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.07.001
  • McKinsey and Co. (2021). Disruption & Uncertainty: The State of Grocery Retail 2021-Europe-. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/˜/media/mckinsey/industries/retail/our%20insights/the%20path%20forward%20for%20european%20grocery%20retailers/disruption-and-uncertainty-the-state-of-grocery-retail-2021-europe-final.pdf
  • Mehmeti, G. & Xhoxhi, O. (2014). Future Food Trends, Annals. Food Science and Technology, 15 (2), 392–400.
  • Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N. & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2 (2), 109–138. doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2015.19
  • Murphy, A. J. (2003). (Re) solving space and time: fulfilment issues in online grocery retailing. Environment and planning A, 35(7), 1173–1200. doi.org/10.1068/a35102
  • Nielsen (2019). Radiografía del gran consumo en España 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.ioncomunicacion.es/wp-content/uploads/Nielsen-informe-gran-consumo-2018.pdf
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric theory. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Piqueras-Fiszman, B. & Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences in product packaging: Assessing color-flavor correspondences for potato chips (crisps). Appetite, 57, 753–757. doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.07.012
  • PitchBook, Morningstar, IBISWorld, Business Insider & Nielsen. (2020). Online grocery shopping sales in the United States from 2012 to 2021 (in billion U.S. dollars). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/293707/us-online-grocery-sales/.
  • Robina-Ramírez, R., Chamorro-Mera, A. & Moreno-Luna, L. (2020). Organic and online attributes for buying and selling agricultural products in the e-marketplace in Spain. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 42, 100992. doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100992
  • Schifferstein, H. N. J. (1996). Cognitive factors affecting taste intensity judgments. Food Quality and Preference, 7, 167–175. doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00007-9
  • Silayoi, P. & Speece, M. (2007), "The importance of packaging attributes: a conjoint analysis approach", European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1495–1517. doi.org/10.1108/03090560710821279
  • Spence, C. (2011). Mouth-watering: The influence of environmental and cognitive factors on salivation and gustatory/flavour perception. Journal of Texture Studies, 42, 157–171. doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.2011.00299.x
  • Spence, C. (2016). Multisensory Packaging Design: Color, Shape, Texture, Sound, and Smell. In : Burgess, P. (Ed.), Integrating the Packaging and Product Experience in Food and Beverages: A Road-Map to Consumer Satisfaction. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 1–22.
  • Spence, C. & Deroy, O. (2014). Tasting shapes: A review of four hypotheses. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 10, 207–238. dx.doi.org/10.12775/ths-2013-0011
  • Spence, C. & Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2014). The perfect meal: The multisensory science of food and dining. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Statista (2019). https://www.statista.com/
  • Velasco, C., Wan, X., Salgado-Montejo, A., Woods, A., Andrés Oñate, G., Mu, B. & Spence, C., (2014). The context of colour-flavour associations in crisps packaging: a cross-cultural study comparing Chinese, Colombian, and British consumers. Food Quality and Preference 38, 49–57.
  • Woods, A. T., Poliakoff, E., Lloyd, D. M., Dijksterhuis, G. B. & Thomas, A. (2010). Flavor expectation: The effects of assuming homogeneity on drink perception. Chemosensory Perception, 3, 174–181. doi.org/10.1007/s12078-010-9080-2
Data source: Dialnet