Validez Estructural de una Versión Reducida del Cuestionario del Sueño de Mannheim

  1. Mar Mediano 1
  2. Jesús M. Alvarado 2
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Facultad de Psicología
  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Psicología
Journal:
Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica

ISSN: 1135-3848

Year of publication: 2022

Issue Title: Avances en Medición en Psicología

Volume: 5

Issue: 66

Pages: 53-64

Type: Article

DOI: 10.21865/RIDEP66.5.04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica

Abstract

The study of sleep and dreams is one of the classic topics of clinical psychology, and one of the variables of interest is the frequency with which they are recall. The MADRE questionnaire is an instrument widely used for this purpose and has been translated into several languages. The present study aims to evaluate the structural validity of a Spanish reduced version. Four models were tested by means of confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 357 Spanish-speaking university students: unidimensional, classic Bifactor, Bifactor S-1 and four-factor multidimensional. The results provided the best fit for the Bifactor S-1 model, with the latent variables recall as a general factor common to all items and the variables attitudes, negative emotions and relationship with wakefulness, as specific factors.

Bibliographic References

  • Asún, R. A., Rdz-Navarro, K., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Developing multidimensional Likert scales using item factor analysis: The case of four-point items. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(1), 109-133. https://doi:10.1177/0049124114566716
  • Aumann, C., Lahl, O., & Pietrowsky, R. (2012). Relationship between dream structure, boundary structure and the Big Five personality dimensions. Dreaming, 22(2), 124-135
  • Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, Second Edn. Guilford Publications.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16.
  • Dyck, S., Schredl, M., & Kühnel, A. (2017). Retest reliability study of the Mannheim Dream Questionnaire (MADRE). International Journal of Dream Research, 10(2), 173-176.
  • Eid, M., Geiser, C., Koch, T., & Heene, M. (2017). Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22, 541-562. https://doi:10.1037/met0000083
  • Ghorayeb, I., Napias, A., Denechere, E., & Mayo, W. (2019). Validation of the French version of the Mannheim. International Journal of Dream Research, 12(2), 23-34.
  • Godin, I., Montplaisir, J., & Nielsen, T. (2015). Dreaming and nightmares in REM sleep behavior disorder. Dreaming, 25(4), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/drm0000011
  • Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(3), 269-274.
  • Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66, 373-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294440
  • Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. En R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195-216). Scientific Software International.
  • Hobson, J. A., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Waking and dreaming consciousness: Neurobiological and functional considerations. Progress in Neurobiology, 98(1), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.003
  • Klepel. F., Schredl, M., & Göritz, A. (2019). Dreams stimulate waking-life creativity and problem solving: Effects of personality traits. International Journal of Dream Research, 12(1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.11588/ijodr.2019.1.58950
  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611-637. https://doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mediano, M., Montoro, P. R., Contreras, M. J., & Mayas, J. (2022). Assessment of a Spanish version of the Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE) in a young adult Spanish sample. International Journal of Dream Research, 15(2), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.11588/ijodr.2022.2.84172
  • Metzinger, T. (2013). Why are dreams interesting for philosophers? The example of minimal phenomenal selfhood, plus an agenda for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00746
  • Napias, A., Denechere, E., Mayo, W., & Ghorayeb, I. (2021). Assessment of dreamrelated aspects and beliefs in a large cohort of French students using a validated French version of the Mannheim Dream questionnaire. PLoS ONE 16(3): e0247506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal
  • Nielsen T. (2012). Variations in dream recall frequency and dream theme diversity by age and sex. Frontiers in neurology, 3, 106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00106
  • Ondé, D. (2020). A revision of the causality concept in the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 1(54), 103-117.
  • Ondé, D., Alvarado, J. M., Sastre, S., & Azañedo, C. M. (2021). Application of S-1 bifactor model to evaluate the structural validity of TMMS-24. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7427.
  • Otaiku, A. I. (2022). Distressing dreams and risk of Parkinson’s disease: A population-based cohort study. eClinicalMedicine, 101474. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/art icle/PIIS2589-5370(22)00204-8/fulltext#%20
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36.
  • Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.
  • Scapin, F., Dehon, H., & Englebert, J. (2018). Assessment of a French version of the Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE) in a Belgian sample. International Journal of Dream Research, 11(1), 46-53
  • Settineri, S., Frisone, F., Alibrandi, M., & Merlo, M. (2019). Italian adaptation of the Mannheim Dream Questionnaire. (MADRE): Age, gender and dream recall effects. International Journal of Dream Research, 12(1), 119-129.
  • Shahabian, M., Kargar, E., Ferdosi, N. S., Sorayani, F. J., Moghadam, S. A., & Rad, E. (2018). Validity, reliability and factor analysis the Persian adaption of Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE). International Journal of Dream Research, 11(2), 135-140.
  • Shahabian, M., Taghipour, A., Khademi, G., Ferdosi, N. S., Jahantiq, H., Salmani, E. R., & Ebadirad, M. (2017). Validity and reliability assessment of Persian adaption of Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE). International Journal of Dream Research, 10(1), 53-58.
  • Schredl, M., Berres. S., Klingauf, A., Schellhaas, S., & Göritz, A. (2014). The Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE): Retest reliability, age and gender effects. International Journal of Dream Research, 7(2). 141-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ijodr.2014.2.16675
  • Schredl, M., Braband, M., Gödde, J., Kreicker, S., & Göritz, A. S. (2019). Dream recall frequency and attitude toward dreams: Stability over a 5-year period. Dreaming, 29(4), 303.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th Ed.). Routledge
  • Solomonova, E., & Carr, M. (2021). The role of attention and intention in dreams. Access and Mediation, 163.
  • Trizano-Hermosilla, I., Gálvez-Nieto, J. L., Alvarado, J. M., Saiz, J. L., & Salvo-Garrido, S. (2021). Reliability estimation in multidimensional scales: Comparing the bias of six estimators in measures with a bifactor structure. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fp syg.2021.508287
  • Vallat, R., Eichenlaub, J. B., Nicolas, A., & Ruby, P. (2018). Dream recall frequency is associated with medial prefrontal cortex white-matter density. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01856
Data source: Dialnet