El manifiesto académico. De la universidad ocupada a la universidad libre

  1. Halffman, Willem
  2. Radder, Hans
  3. Aladro Vico, Eva trad.
Revista:
CIC: Cuadernos de información y comunicación

ISSN: 1135-7991,  1988-4001

Año de publicación: 2017

Título del ejemplar: Lenguaje digital

Número: 22

Páginas: 259-281

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/CIYC.55978 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: CIC: Cuadernos de información y comunicación

Resumen

Las universidades están siendo ocupadas por la perspectiva empresarial, en un régimen obsesionado con el “reconocimiento” mediante la cuantificación, la competitividad creciente, la eficiencia, la “excelencia” y una errónea idea de salvación económica. Dados los indeseables efectos colaterales de esta ocupación, nos preguntamos cómo ha conseguido esta perspectiva empresarial invadir nuestras preciadas universidades. Ofrecemos una visión alternativa del futuro académico a partir de la idea de universidad pública, más próxima a ser un bien común comprometido con el conocimiento de la sociedad que a una corporación. Sugerimos algunas medidas eficaces para generar ese tipo de universidad. Pero dado que la empresa parece inasequible a los argumentos citados, estos cambios sólo pueden darse si los académicos pasan a la acción. Por ello, exploramos algunas estrategias para renovar la vida política de las universidades.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abma, Ruud. 2013. De publicatiefabriek. Over de betekenis van de affaire Stapel. Nijmegen: Uitgeverij Vantilt.
  • American Society for Cell Biology et al. 2012. San Francisco declaration on research assessment. http://am.ascb.org/dora. Accessed 3 December 2014.
  • Bal, Ellen, Erella Grassiani, and Kate Kirk. 2014. “Neoliberal individualism in Dutch universities: Teaching and learning anthropology in an insecure environment”. Learning and Teaching 7(3): 46–72.
  • Bok, Derek. 2003. Universities in the marketplace. The commercialization of higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Boomkens, Rene´. 2008. Topkitsch en slow science. Kritiek van de academische rede. Amsterdam: Van Gennep. Collini, Stefan. 2012.
  • De Boer, Harry, Ju¨rgen Enders, and Uwe Schimank. 2007. “On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany”. en New forms of governance in research organizations. Disciplinary approaches, interfaces and integration, ed. D. Jansen, 137–152. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Dijstelbloem, Huub, Frank Huisman, Frank Miedema, and Wijnand Mijnhardt. 2013. Why science does not work as it should. And what to do about it. http://www.scienceintransition.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Science-in-Transition-Position-Paper-final.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2014.
  • Edgerton, David. 2007. The shock of the old. Technology and global history since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Engelen, Ewald, Rodrigo Fernandez, and Reijer Hendrikse. 2014. “How finance penetrates its other: A cautionary tale on the financialization of a Dutch university”. Antipode 46(4): 1072–1091.
  • Evans, Mary. 2005. Killing thinking. The death of the university. London: Continuum.
  • Funnekotter, Bart, and Hugo Logtenberg. 2013, March 30 and 31. De vastgelopen universiteit. NRC Z&Z: 13–14.
  • Gill, Rosalind. 2009. Breaking the silence. The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. In Secrecy and silence in the research process. Feminist reflections, eds. R. Ryan-Flood, and Rosalind Gill, 228–244. London: Routledge.
  • Graham, Gordon. 2002. Universities. The recovery of an idea. Exeter: Imprint.
  • Halffman, Willem, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2010.” Is inequality among universities increasing? Gini coefficients and the elusive rise of elite universities”. Minerva 48(1): 55–72.
  • Hayes, Dennis, and Robin Wynyard (eds.). 2002. The McDonaldization of higher education. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
  • Heilbron, Johan. 2011. But what about the European union of scholars? Wassenaar: NIAS.
  • Herbert, Danielle L., Adrian G. Barnett, and Nicholas Graves. 2013. “Funding. Australia’s grant system wastes time”. Nature 495(7441): 314.
  • Holmwood, John (ed.). 2011. A manifesto for the public university. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Hood, Christopher, and Guy Peters. 2004. “The middle aging of new public management. Into the age of paradox?” Journal of Public Administration and Theory 14(3): 267–282.
  • Krijnen, Christian, Chris Lorenz, and Joachim Umlauf (eds.). 2011. Wahrheit oder Gewinn? Ü ber die Ökonomisierung von Universität und Wissenschaft. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
  • Krücken, Georg. 2014. “Higher education reforms and unintended consequences: a research agenda”. Studies in Higher Education 39(8): 1439–1450.
  • Landsman, Klaas. 2013. “‘It’s all about the bucks, kid. The rest is conversation’”. Ethos of Science Lecture, 8 May, 2013. http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47658664/EthosofScience8Mei2013.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2014.
  • Lorenz, Chris. 2006. “Will the universities survive the European integration? Higher education policies in the EU and the Netherlands before and after the Bologna Declaration”. Sociologia Internationalis 44(1): 123–153.
  • Lorenz, Chris. 2012. “If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and New Public Management”. Critical Inquiry 38: 599–629.
  • Lustig, Jeff. 2005. “The university revisioned: The alternative to corporate mis-education”. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 27(1): 17–52.
  • Merton, Robert K. 1973. The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. 2014. Wetenschapsvisie 2025: keuzes voor de toekomst. http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-blicaties/rapporten/2014/11/25/wetenschapsvisie-2025-keuzes-voor-de-toekomst/wetenschapsvisie-2025-keuzes-voor-de-toekomst. pdf. Accedido 3 December 2014.
  • Pels, Dick. 2003. Unhastening science. Autonomy and reflexivity in the social theory of knowledge. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  • Radder, Hans. 2012, September 15. Managers Vrije Universiteit sturen wetenschappers naar huis. Trouw,22. http://www.trouw.nl/tr/nl/6700/Wetenschap/article/detail/3317130/2012/09/16/WetenschappersVU-moeten-hun-boeken-maar-thuis-laten.dhtml. Accessed 3 December 2014.
  • Radder, Hans (ed.). 2010. The commodification of academic research. Science and the modern university. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Ritzer, George. 1998. The McDonaldization thesis. Londen: Sage.
  • Sanders, Wouter, and Evert van der Zweerde (eds.). 2012. Denkruimte. Reflecties op universitaire idealen en praktijken. Nijmegen: Valkhof Pers. 186
  • W. Halffman, H. Radder 123 Schimank, Uwe. 2005. “New Public Management and the academic profession. Reflections on the German situation”. Minerva 43(4): 361–376.
  • Ten Hooven, Marcel. 2013. “De uitverkoop van de universiteit”. De Groene Amsterdammer 137(20): 19–23.
  • Tijdink, Joeri K., Anton C.M. Vergouwen, and Yvo M. Smulders. 2012. “De gelukkige wetenschapper”. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 156(A5715): 1–4.
  • Torfs, Rik. 2014. Moed als universitair ideaal. In Waartoe is de universiteit op aarde?, eds. A. Verbrugge, and J. van Baardewijk, 245–256. Amsterdam: Boom.
  • Tuchman, Gaye. 2009. Wannabe U. Inside the corporate university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Van Arensbergen, Pleun, Laurens Hessels, and Barend van der Meulen. 2013. Talent centraal. Ontwikkeling en selectie van wetenschappers in Nederland. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.
  • Van den Besselaar, Peter, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2009. “Past performance, peer review and project selection in the social sciences”. Research Evaluation 18(4): 273–288.
  • Van der Burg, Wibren. 2012. “De onzichtbare kosten van controleen selectieprocedures. NWOpromotieprojecten op het terrein van recht & bestuur als casestudy”. Nederlands Juristenblad 36: 2528–2537.
  • Verbrugge, Ad, and Jelle van Baardewijk (eds.). 2014. Waartoe is de universiteit op aarde? Amsterdam: Boom.
  • Vanclay, Jerome K. 2012. “Impact factor. Outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?” Scientometrics 92(2): 211–238.
  • Verontruste VU’ers. 2012. Dekoloniseer de VU. We zijn geen koekjesfabriek. http://www.advalvas.vu.nl/ opinie/dekoloniseer-de-vu-we-zijn-geen-koekjesfabriek. Accessed 3 December 2014.
  • Washburn, Jennifer. 2003. University, Inc. The corporate corruption of higher education. New York: Basic Books.
  • Weingart, Peter. 2005. “Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system. Inadvertent consequences?” Scientometrics 62(1): 117–131.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet