Análisis de la participación de las empresas transnacionales en las estrategias de desarrollo en América Latina y AsiaLos casos de Corea del Sur y Brasil

  1. Elena Pérez Lagüela 1
  1. 1 Investigadora predoctoral Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Revista:
Papeles de Europa

ISSN: 1989-5917

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 34

Número: 1

Páginas: 41-51

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/PADE.78996 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Papeles de Europa

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The purpose of this paper is to review the specialized literature in order to systematise –and to categorise– some of the attributable causes to the divergence in the development processes in two regions, Latin America and East Asia, based on two representative experiences of each region (Brazil and South Korea) in which strategies with developmentalist aspirations were implemented, each with its very own levels of concretion and achievement. To this end, the role that both transnational corporations and states have historically played in the development strategies of both countries will be studied, and an attempt will be made to determine to what extent the participation of transnational corporations, conditioning or strengthening their alliance with the State, was decisive in the successful implementation of development strategies in both countries.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Biggart, N. y Guillén, M. (1999): «Developing Difference: Social Organization and the Rise of the Auto Industries of South Korea, Taiwan, Spain, and Argentina», American Sociological Review, vol. 64, núm. 5, pp. 722-747.
  • Catalán, J. (2010): «Strategic Policy Revisited: The Origins of Mass Production in the Motor Industry of Argentina, Korea and Spain, 1945-87», Business History, vol. 52, núm. 2, pp. 207-230.
  • Cho, Y. J. (2001): «The International Environment and Korea’s Economic Development during 1950s-1970s», The Bank of Korea Economic Papers, vol. 4, núm. 2, pp. 115-138.
  • Crotty, J., Epstein, G. y Kelly, P. (1998): «Multinational Corporations in the Neo-Liberal Regime», en Baker, et al. (Eds.): Globalization and Progressive Economic Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1-25.
  • Cuyvers, L. y Dumont, M. (2005): «Tigers, Pussycats and Flying Geese: The Faunal Characteristics of Economic Growth in South-East Asia», en Cuyvers, L. y De Beule, F. (Eds.): Transnational Corporations and Economic Development: From Internationalization to Globalization, Londres, Palgrave.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1979): « Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests», Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 11, pp. 9-31.
  • Dunning, J. H. y Lundan, S. (2008): Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Evans, P. (1992): «The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy, and Structural Change», en Haggard, S. y Kaufman, R. R. (Eds.): Politics of Economic Adjustment. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 139-181.
  • Evans, P. (1998): «Transnational Corporations and Third World States: From the Old Internationalization to the New», en KozulWrigt, R y Rowthorn, R. (Eds.), Transnational Corporation and the Global Economy. Londres, McMillan Press, 195-224.
  • Fitzsimons, A. L. (2016): «Proceso de trabajo e internacionalización del capital: determinantes globales del “atraso” tecnológico de la industria automotriz argentina en las décadas de 1950 y 1960», Trabajo y Sociedad, núm. 26, pp. 225-240.
  • Fortwengel, J. (2011): «Upgrading through integration? The case of Central European Automotive Industry System» Transcience Journal, 2(1), pp. 1-12.
  • Frankel, J. A., Romer, D. y Cyrus, T. et al. (1994): «Trade and Growth in East Asian Countries: Cause and Effect?», NBER Working Paper, Nº 5732.
  • Fröbel, F., Kreye, O. y Heinrichs, J. (1980): La nueva división internacional del trabajo. Paro estructural en los países industrializados e industrialización de los países en desarrollo. Madrid, Siglo XXI (Cambridge, 1977).
  • García-Blanch, F. (2001): «An Empirical Inquiry into the Nature of South Korean Economic Growth», CID Working Paper, Nº 74, septiembre de 2001.
  • Gereffi, G. y Evans, P. (1981): «Transnational Corporations, Dependent Development and State Policy in the Semiperiphery: A Comparison of Brazil and Mexico», Latin America Research Review, 16(3), 31-64.
  • Haggard, S. y Cheng, T-J. (1994): «State and Foreign Capital in the East Asian NICs», en Deyo, F. C. (Ed.), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Londres, Cornell University Press.
  • Jo, Y. H. (2011): « The Capitalist World-System and Us Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of post-World War II American Nation-Building in Germany and Korea», Journal of World Systems Research, vol. 17, núm. 2, pp. 428-425.Kim, E. M. (1997): Big Business, Strong State. Collusion and Conflict in South Korean Development, 1960-1990. Nueva York: State University of New York Press.
  • Kim, L. (2005): Da imitação à inovação. A dinâmica do aprendizado tecnológico da Coréia. Campinas, Editora da Unicamp. Kohli, A. (2004): State-Directed Development. Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Lawrence, R. y Weinstein, D. (1999): «Trade and Growth: Import-Led or Export-Led? Evidence from Japan and Korea», NBER Working Paper Nº 7264, julio de 1999.
  • Mandel, E. (1972): El capitalismo tardío. México, D. F., Ediciones Era
  • Martínez Peinado, J. (2011): «La estructura teórica Centro/Periferia y el análisis del Sistema Económico Global: ¿obsoleta o necesaria?», Revista de Economía Mundial, núm. 29, pp. 29-59.
  • Mirza, H. (1999): «The Globalization of Business and East-Asian Developing-Country Multinationals», en Hood, N. y Young, S.: The Globalization of Multinational Enterprise Activity and Economic Development. Nueva York, St. Martin’s Press.
  • Moreira Lima, U. (2017): «O debate sobre o processo de desenvolvimento econômico da Coreia do Sul: uma linha alternativa de interpretação», Economía e Sociedade, vol. 26, núm. 3(61), pp. 585-631.
  • Novack, G. (1974): La ley del desarrollo desigual y combinado de la sociedad. Bogotá, Editorial Pluma. Palazuelos, E. (dir.) (2015): Economía Política Mundial. Madrid: Akal.
  • Shapiro, H. (1989): «State Intervention and Industrialization: The Origins of the Brazilian Automotive Industry», The Journal of Economic History, 49(2), The Tasks of Economic History, junio de 1989, 448-450.
  • Sourrouille, J. (1980): El complejo automotor en Argentina: transnacionales en América Latina. México, D. F., Nueva Imagen.
  • Sumner, A.; Sánchez-Ancochea, D. y Rugraff, E. (2009): Transnational Corporations and Development Policy. Critical Perspectives, Londres, Palgrave McMillan.
  • Trotsky, L. (2017): Historia de la Revolución Rusa. Madrid, Capitán Swing (Londres, 1932)
  • Wallerstein, I. (1976): The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Nueva York: Academic Press.
  • Yeung, H. W-Ch. (2007): «From Followers to Market Leaders: Asian Electronic Firms in the Global Economy», Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 48(1), 1-25.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet