Cognición docente y filosofía de enseñanza en profesores en formación de inglés como lengua extranjera

  1. Martín-González, Daniel 1
  2. Mora-López, Natalia 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Revista de investigación en educación

ISSN: 1697-5200 2172-3427

Ano de publicación: 2023

Volume: 21

Número: 2

Páxinas: 242-258

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.35869/REINED.V21I2.4602 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista de investigación en educación

Resumo

Teaching cognition analyzes teachers’ concepts about teaching, emphasizing their beliefs, which affect the instruction process. This well-known field of knowledge, already established three decades ago, still lacks more studies on EFL training teachers’ beliefs. This study analyzes 17 teaching philosophies from students of the “English Didactics” course from the Master’s program in Teacher Training at CEU San Pablo, a private university in Madrid. This corpus has been analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The texts have been processed through Sketch Engine, an online corpus manager. Moreover, students’ philosophies have been divided into 3 main categories according to the training teachers’ didactic experience: those who had worked at language schools, private tutors, and no experience at all. Thus, this study will help to get to know better training teachers’ beliefs in terms of the definition of teaching/learning, the teacher’s role, the student’s role, teaching methodology, and the evaluation.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barahona, M. (2016). English language teacher education in Chile: A cultural activity theory perspective. Routledge.
  • Beatty, J., Leigh, J. y Lund Dean, K. (2020). Republication of: Finding our roots: An exercise for creating a personal teaching philosophy statement. Journal of Management Education, 44(5), 560-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920912916
  • Böheim, R., Schnitzler, K., Gröschner, A., Weil, M., Knogler, M., Schindler, A.-K., Alles, M. y Seidel, T. (2021). How changes in teachers’ dialogic discourse practice relate to students’ activation, motivation, and cognitive engagement. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100450
  • Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. The International Abstracting Journal for Language teachers and Applied Linguists, 36, 81-109.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
  • Cautín Epifani, V., Arellano Arellano, R., Pezoa Tudela, R. y Gladic-Miralles, J. (2020). Creencias docentes de profesores en formación sobre el aprendizaje de la lectura en L2: Bases teóricas y una propuesta de investigación. Estudios Pedagógicos, 46(1), 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052020000100033
  • Dafouz, E. (2021). ‘So, after a week, I became a teacher of English’: Physics lecturers’ beliefs on the integration of content and language in English-medium higher education. En K. Read Talbot, M.-T. Gruber y R. Nishida (Eds.).The psychological experience of integrating content and language (pp. 133-152). Multilingual Matters.
  • Dafouz, E. y Smith, U. (2020). ROAD-MAPPING English Medium Education in the internationalised university. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23463-8
  • Dafouz, E., Hüttner, J. y Smith, U. (2016). University teachers’ beliefs of language and content integration in English-medium education in multilingual settings. En T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, Pat Moore y U. Smit (Eds.).Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 123-143). Multilingual Matters.
  • Estenten - Spanish corpus from the web. Sketch Engine (2021, November 3). Descargado el 28 de junio de 2022, de:https://www.sketchengine.eu/estenten-spanish-corpus/.
  • Felicilda-Reynaldo, R.F. y Utley, R. (2015). Reflections of evidence-based practice in nurse educators’ teaching philosophy statements. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(2), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.5480/13-1176
  • Horsfall, J., Cleary, M. y Hunt, G. (2012). Developing a pedagogy for nursing teaching-learning. Nurse Education Today, 32(8), 930-933.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.10.022
  • Kalaja, P. y Ferreira Barcelos, A. M. (2003) (Eds.). Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches. Kluwer Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0
  • Laundon, M., Cathcart, A. y Greer, D. (2020). Teaching philosophy statements. Journal of Management Education, 44(5), 577-587.https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920942289
  • Li, L. (2017). Social interaction and teacher cognition. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Li, L. (2020). Language teacher cognition. A sociocultural perspective. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51134-8
  • Owens, L., Miller, J. y Grise-Owens, E. (2014). Activating a teaching philosophy in social work education: Articulation, implementation, and evaluation. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(3), 332-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2014.907597
  • Payant, C. (2017). Teaching philosophy statements: In-service ESL teachers’ practices and beliefs. TESOL Journal, 8(3), 636-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.290
  • Payant, C. e Hirano, E. (2018). Recurring topics in English language teachers’ written teaching philosophy statements. TESL Canada Journal, 35(1), 29-51.http://dx.doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v35i1.1283
  • Praat, D. (2005). Personal philosophies of teaching: A false promise? Academe, 91(1), 32-35. http://doi.org/10.2307/40252734
  • Schönwetter, D., Sokal, L., Freisen, M. y Taylor, L. (2002). Teaching philosophies reconsidered: A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of TP statements. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440210156501
  • Sketch Engine (s.f.). Simple Maths. Recuperado de: https://www.sketchengine.eu/documentation/simple-maths/
  • Zheng, H. (2015). Teacher beliefs as a complex system: English language teachers in China. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23009-2