Innovación abierta y apropiación en el sector manufacturero de Colombia

  1. Yury Castillo 1
  2. Isabel Álvarez 2
  3. Juan Carlos Salazar 3
  1. 1 University of Cauca, Colombia
  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España
  3. 3 Autonomous University of Madrid, España
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Innovar: revista de ciencias administrativas y sociales

ISSN: 0121-5051

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 33

Número: 89

Páginas: 21-36

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Innovar: revista de ciencias administrativas y sociales

Resumen

Las empresas necesitan abrirse en muchas ocasiones a la colaboración con diversos actores para llevar a cabo sus proyectos de innovación y, a la vez, deben contar con mecanismos para prevenir posibles fugas indeseadas de conocimiento que dificultarían la apropiación de los beneficios en la fase de comercialización. Aunque resultados recientes muestran que distintos mecanismos de apropiación (formales o estratégicos) pueden tener un efecto diferenciado sobre la decisión de cooperar con socios externos, la mayoría de estas investigaciones eluden la importancia del contexto y se centran en empresas ubicadas en economías desarrolladas. En este trabajo, se analiza el comportamiento de esta relación en el contexto de las economías emergentes y, en particular, en las empresas manufactureras de Colombia. Los resultados muestran que, si bien el uso de los dos tipos de mecanismos afecta de forma positiva la probabilidad de cooperación de las empresas estudiadas, el tamaño del efecto difiere entre los tipos de cooperación y también cuando la cooperación se limita al objetivo específico de la i+d. Las implicaciones que se derivan del análisis tienen interés tanto para la comprensión de la estrategia empresarial como para las políticas de innovación.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albis, N., Álvarez, I., & García, A. (2021). The impact of external, internal, and dual relational embeddedness on the innovation performance of foreign subsidiaries: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of International Management, 27(4l), 100854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100854
  • Alexy, O., Criscuolo, P., & Salter, A. (2009). Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation? MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(1), 71-77. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/does-ip-strategy-have-to-cripple-open-innovation/
  • Arbussà, A., & Coenders, G. (2007). Innovation activities, use of appropriation instruments and absorptive capacity: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 36(10), 1545-1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.013
  • Arora, A., Athreye, S., & Huang, C. (2016). The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators. Research Policy, 45(7), 1352-1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.019
  • Arundel, A. (2001). The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy, 30(4), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1
  • Athreye, S., & Fassio, C. (2019). Why do innovators not apply for trademarks? The role of information asymmetries and collaborative innovation. Industry and Innovation, 27(1-2), 134-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1616533
  • Barros, H. M. (2021). Neither at the cutting edge nor in a patent-friendly environment: Appropriating the returns from innovation in a less developed economy. Research Policy, 50(1), 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104097
  • Belderbos, R., Cassiman, B., Faems, D., Leten, B., & Van Looy, B. (2014). Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 841-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013
  • Bogers, M., Burcharth, A., & Chesbrough, H. (2019). Open innovation in Brazil: Exploring oportunities and challenges. International Journal of Innovation, 7(2), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i2.417
  • Bonte, W., & Keilbach, M. (2005). Concubinage or marriage? Informal and formal cooperations for innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(3-4), 279-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.01.007
  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
  • Calderón-Martínez, M. G., & García-Quevedo, J. (2013). Knowledge transfer and university patents in Mexico. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 26(1), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-05-2013-0039
  • Campi, M., Dueñas Esterling, M. A., & Zuluaga, J. C. (2020). ¿El fortalecimiento de los derechos de propiedad intelectual estimula la innovación? Un análisis exploratorio de la dinámica de patentamiento por sectores industriales en Colombia, 1980-2010. Cuadernos de Administración, 33. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao33.fdpi
  • Cassiman, B., & Valentini, G. (2016). Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1034-1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2375
  • Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344704
  • Castillo-Molina, Y. Y. (2017). Innovación abierta y apropiabilidad: estudio sobre las implicaciones de la “paradoja de la apertura” en el sector manufacturero de Colombia [Working Paper No 2017/30]. Cátedra UAM-Accenture. https://www.catedrauamaccenture.com/uam-accenture-working-papers/
  • Castillo-Molina, Y. Y., & Gómez-Villamarín, C. A. (2021). Efectos de la cooperación tecnológica sobre la actividad innovadora del sector manufacturero de Colombia. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 11(3), 479-492. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n3.2021.13345
  • Castillo-Vergara, M., & Torres Aranibar, E. (2019). El papel de la cooperación para desarrollar innovación tecnológica en la PYME. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 14(4), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242019000400041
  • Ceccagnoli, M. (2009). Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.723
  • Chesbrough, H.. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00309_1.x
  • Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. En H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbek, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3-28). Disponible en SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2427233
  • Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
  • Corral de Zubielqui, G., Jones, J., & Audretsch, D. (2019). The influence of trust and collaboration with external partners on appropriability in open service firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 540-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9696-y
  • Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
  • De Fuentes, C., & Dutrénit, G. (2016). Geographic proximity and university–industry interaction: The case of Mexico. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9364-9
  • De Oliveira, P., & Da Silva Ferreira, J. (2019). The role of the appropriability mechanisms for the innovative success of Portuguese small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Innovation Managament, 23(4), 1950032. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500324
  • Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). (2019, noviembre 27). Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica. Industria Manufacturera - EDIT IX. 2017 - 2018 [Boletín técnico]. DANE. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/edit/boletin_EDIT_manufacturera_2017_2018.pdf
  • Forero-Pineda, C. (2006). The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries. Research Policy, 35(6), 808-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2006.04.003
  • Forero-Pineda, C., Laureiro-Martinez, D., & Marín, A. (2011). Innovation patterns and intellectual property in SMEs of a developing country. Innovar, 21(42), 113-127. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/70736
  • Freel, M., & Robson, P. J. (2017). Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(5), 578-596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616654957
  • Gama, F. (2019). Managing collaborative ideation: The role of formal and informal appropriability mechanisms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(1), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0544-1
  • Goedhuys, M., & Veugelers, R. (2012). Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 516-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2011.01.004
  • Graham, S., & Mowery, D. (2006). The use of intellectual property in software: Implications for open innovation. En H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 184-204). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00502.x
  • Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations’ performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 294-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.015
  • Guimón, J., & Salazar-Elena, J.-C. (2015). Collaboration in innovation between foreign subsidiaries and local universities: Evidence from Spain. Industry and Innovation, 22(6), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2015.1089034
  • Hagedoorn, J., & Zobel, A. K. (2015). The role of contracts and intellectual property rights in open innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(9), 1050-1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1056134
  • Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., & Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 375-423. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.2.375
  • Henkel, J., Schöberl, S., & Alexy, O. (2014). The emergence of openness: How and why firms adopt selective revealing in open innovation. Research Policy, 43(5), 879-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.014
  • Henttonen, K., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Ritala, P. (2016). Managing the appropriability of R&D collaboration. R&D Management, 46(S1), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12121
  • Herstad, S. J., Aslesen, H. W., & Ebersberger, B. (2014). On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Research Policy, 43(3), 495-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.003
  • Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2009). The availability, strength and efficiency of appropriability mechanisms – protecting investments in knowledge creation. International Journal of Technology Management, 45(3-4), 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.022653
  • James, S. D., Leiblein, M. J., & Lu, S. (2013). How firms capture value from their innovations. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1123-1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488211
  • Juliao Rossi, J. L., Barrios Aguirre, F., Schmutzler, J., & Sánchez Manchola, I. D. (2013). Relación entre la estrategia de innovación de la firma y su decisión de patentar: evidencia de empresas pertenecientes al sector manufacturero colombiano. Estudios Gerenciales, 29(128), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.09.005
  • Keupp, M. M., Beckenbauer, A., & Gassmann, O. (2009). How managers protect intellectual property rights in China using de facto strategies. R&D Management, 39(2), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00550.x
  • Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
  • Leiponen, A., & Byma, J. (2009). If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies. Research Policy, 38(9), 1478-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.003
  • Lerner, J. (2002). 150 years of patent protection. American Economic Review, 92(2), 221-225. DOI: 10.1257/000282802320189294
  • Louma, T., Paasi, J., & Valkokari, K. (2010). Intellectual property in inter-organisational relationships - Findings from an interview study. International Journal of Innovation Managament, 14(3), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919610002702
  • Manzini, R., & Lazzarotti, V. (2016). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in collaborative new product development. R&D Management, 46(S2), 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12126
  • Milesi, D., Petelski, N., & Verre, V. (2013). Innovation and appropriation mechanisms: Evidence from Argentine microdata. Technovation, 33(2-3), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.12.001
  • Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481-1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
  • Miozzo, M., Desyllas, P., Lee, H. F., & Miles, I. (2016). Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, 45(7), 1337-1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.018
  • Moon, S. (2011). What determines the openness of a firm to external knowledge? Evidence from the Korean service sector. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 19(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2011.630502
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos [OCDE]. (2018). Oslo Manual2018.: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4.a ed.). OECD; Eurostat. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
  • Santiago, F., De Fuentes, C., Dutrénit, G., & Gras, N. (2017). What hinders innovation performance of services and manufacturing firms in Mexico? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(3), 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1181297
  • Schaeffer, P. R., Dullius, A. C., Maldonado Rodrigues, R., & Zawislak, P. A. (2017). Encurtando distâncias: Uma nova tipologia para a interação universidade-empresa. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 30(4), 459-473. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-05-2016-0148
  • Stefan, I., & Bengtsson, L. (2016). Appropriability: A key to opening innovation internationally? International Journal of Technology Management, 71(3-4), 232-252. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2016.078570
  • Stefan, I., & Bengtsson, L. (2017). Unravelling appropriability mechanisms and openness depth effects on firm performance across stages in the innovation process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.014
  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
  • Thomas, E. (2018). From closed to open innovation in emerging economies: Evidence from the chemical industry in Brazil. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(3), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1144
  • Ullrich, A., & Vladova, G. (2016). Weighing the pros and cons of engaging in open innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(4), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview980
  • Van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2008.10.001
  • Veer, T., Lorenz, A., & Blind, K. (2016). How open is too open? The mitigating role of appropriation mechanisms in R&D cooperation settings. R&D Management, 46(S3), 1113-1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12232
  • Yu, M. J., Chuang, H. J., Hsu, M. Y., & Lin, P. F. (2020). Firm heterogeneity, appropriability, and innovation collaboration. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(10), 1156-1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1747609
  • Zanello, G., Fu, X., Mohnen, P., & Ventresca, M. (2016). The creation and diffusion of innovation in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(5), 884-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12126
  • Zhang, J., & Groen, A. (2021). Informal and formal open activities: Innovation protection methods as antecedents and innovation outputs as consequences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120696
  • Zobel, A. K., Lokshin, B., & Hagedoorn, J. (2017). Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: The role of openness and innovativeness. Technovation, 59, 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.10.001
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet