El desarrollo teórico del matriarcado en el siglo XIX y los primeros estudios sobre el mito amazónico

  1. Arturo Sánchez Sanz 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Boletín del Museo Arqueológico Nacional

ISSN: 2341-3409

Año de publicación: 2018

Número: 37

Páginas: 221-238

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Boletín del Museo Arqueológico Nacional

Resumen

The Amazonian universe encompasses countless themes: gender, mythology, archeology, social relations, «The Other´s vision», war, autochthony, etc. In short, a exclusively female society where women control all areas; which is therefore considered a matriarchy (apart from those concepts such as matrilineality, matrilocality or both). In fact, It has filled many pages, not just from the Antiquity, and It has remained on humans’ mind for millenniums. Besides, the matriarchal theories emergence during the 19th century has served to restart a discussion surrounding the asleep genre, but never forgotten, which has influenced enormously in the first contemporary analysis about one of the most known Greek myths. Indeed, many of the hypothesis that emerged then, such as the matriarchy or the existence of a Great Primitive Mother Goddess, now all overcame, are still being defended by diverse authors in order to guarantee the assumed real existence of a society with those features, which is depth worthy for a critical analysis.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BABEL, A. (1893): Die Frau und der Socialismus: die Frau in der Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft. Stuttgart: J. H. W. Diek.
  • BACHOFEN, J. J. (1861): Das Mutterrecht: eine Untersuchung über die Gynaikokratie der alten Welt nach ihrer religiösen und rechtlichen Natur. Stuttgart, Verlag von Krais und Hoffmann.
  • BACHOFEN, J. J. (1988): Mitología arcaica y derecho materno. Barcelona: Anthropos.
  • BENNET, F. M. (1912): Religious cults associated with the amazons. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
  • BISSET, K. A. (1971): «Who Were the Amazons?», Greece & Rome, Second Series, vol. 18, n.º 2, pp. 150-151.
  • BLOCH, M. (2010): Marxism and Anthropology. London: Routledge.
  • BLUNDELL, S. (1995): Women in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • BRIFFAULT, R. (1927): The Mothers: a study of the origins of sentiments and institutions. London: New York George Allen & Unwin, the Macmillan Co.
  • BURKERT, W. (1977): Griechische Religion der archaischen und klassischen Epoche. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
  • CADOGAN ROTHERY, G. (1910): The amazons in antiquity and modern times. London: Francis Griffiths.
  • CANTARELLA, E. (1987): Pandoras Daughters. The Role and Status of Women in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • COLARUSSO, J. (1989): «Myths from the Forests of Circassia». The World & I. Washington D. C.: Washington Times Publishing Corporation, pp. 644-651.
  • CREUZER, F. (1819): Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker. Volume II. Leipzig: Heyer und Leske.
  • DARGUN, L. (1886): Mutterrecht und Raubehe und ihre Reste im germanischen Recht und Leben. Breslau: K. Koebner.
  • DURKHEIM, E. (1980): Contributions to l’Année Sociologique. New York: Yash Nandan.
  • DIVALE, W. (1984): Matrilocal Residence in Pre-Literate Society. Ann Arbor, Mich.: UMI Research Press, U.S.
  • ELLER, C. (2011): Gentlemen and Amazons: The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory, 1861–1900. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • ENGELS, F. (1884): The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. Hottingen-Zuric: Swiss Co-Operative Printing Association.
  • EHRENBERG, M. (1989): Women in Prehistory. London: British Museum Press.
  • FERGUSON, A. (1767): An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Edimburgh: T. Cadell.
  • FLUEHR-LOBBAN, C. (1979): «A Marxist reappraisal of the matriarchate», Current Anthropology, vol. 20, n.º 2, pp. 341-360.
  • FOURIER, C. (1808): Théorie des Quatre Mouvements et des destinées générales. Leipzig [s.n.].
  • FRAZER, J. G. (1890): The Golden Bough: a Study of Magic and Religion. Auckland: Floating Press.
  • GAMBLE, E. B. (1894): Evolution of Woman, an inquiry into the dogma of her inferiority to man. New York: G. P. Putnam´s sons.
  • GERHARD, E. (1855): Griechische Mythologie. Berlin: Reimer.
  • GIMBUTAS, M. (1982): The goddesses and gods of Old Europe. 6500-3500 BC. Myths and cult images. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • GURNEY, O. R. (1990): Los hititas. Barcelona: Laertes.
  • HARRISON, J. E. (1912): Themis, a study of the social origins of Greek religión. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • HARTLAND, E. S. (1922): Primitive Law. London: Methuen.
  • HAWKES, J. H. (1968): Dawn of the Gods. New York: Random House.
  • HELLWALD, F. (1888): Die menschliche Familie nach ihrer Entstehung und natürlichen Entwickelung. Leipzig: Ernst Günthers Verlag.
  • HOBBES, T. (1651): Leviathan or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. London: Andrew Crooke, at the Green Dragon.
  • JAIMOUKHA, A. (2001): The Circassians: A Handbook. New York: Palgrave and Routledge.
  • JORDANOV, K.; ALEXANDER, F., y POROZHANOV, K. (2000): Ancient Thrace. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Press.
  • JOSLYN GAGE, M. (1893): Woman, Church and State: a historical account of the status of woman through the Christian ages: with reminiscences of the matriarchate. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.
  • KAUTSKY, K. (1881): Die Entstehung der Ehe und Familie. Stuttgart: Kosmos.
  • KAMPEN, N. B. (1996): Sexuality in Ancient Art. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • KLUGMANN, A. (1870): «Ueber die Amazonen in den Sagen der kleinasiatischen Städte», Philologus 30/4, pp. 524556.
  • KOVALEVSKY, M. (1893): «La famille matriarcale au Caucase», L’Anthropologie, vol. 4, pp. 259-278.
  • KRADER, L. (1974): The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx. Assen: Van Gorkum.
  • LACEY, W. K. (1968): The Family in Classical Greece. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 
  • LAFARGUE, P. (1895): La propriété: origine et évolution. Paris: Delagrave.
  • LAFITAU, J. F. (1974): Customs of the American Indians compared with the Customs of Primitive Times. Toronto: William N. Fenton, Elizabeth L. Moore. Traducción del original de 1724.
  • LARSON-GREEK, J. (1995): Heroine Cults. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • LAURIN, J. (2005): Women of Ancient Athens. Victoria BC: Tafford Publishing.
  • LEONHARD, W. (1911): Hethiter und Amazonen. Die griechische Tradition über die «Chatti» und ein Versuch ihrer historischen Wertung. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
  • LERNER, G. (1986): The creation of patriarchy. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • LEROI-GOURHAN, A. (1964): Les religions de la Préhistoire: Paléolifltique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • LIPPERT, J. (1884): Die Geschichte der Familie. Stuttgart: Verlag von Ferdinand.
  • LIPPERT, J. (1886): Kulturgeschichte der Menschheit en Ihrem Organischen Aufbau. Stuttgart: Enke.
  • LOPES, A., y ROTH, G. (2000): Men’s Feminism: August Bebel and the German Socialist Movement. New York: Humanity Books.
  • LOWIE, R. H. (1920): Primitive Society. New York: Boni and Liveright.
  • LUBBOCK, J. (1870): The origin of civilisation and the primitive condition of man. New York: D. Appleton and company.
  • MAINE, S. (1861): Ancient Law. Toronto: J. M. Dent.
  • MORGAN, L. H. (1877): Ancient Society. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.
  • MULLER, K. O. (1824): Geschichten hellenischer Stamme und Städte, II. Die Dorier. 2 vols. Breslau: Verlage.
  • NEUMANN, E. (1955): The Great Mother. An analysis of the archetype. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, Bollingen Series.
  • PEMBROKE, S. (1965): «Last of the Matriarchs: a Study in the Inscriptions of Lycia», JESHO, 8, pp. 217-247.
  • POMEROY, S. B. (1991): Diosas, rameras, esposas y esclavas. Mujeres en la Antigüedad Clásica. Madrid: Akal.
  • REED, E. (1975): Woman´s Evolution, from matriarchal clan to patriarchal family. New York: Pathfinder Press.
  • REINACH, A. (1913): L’origine des Amazones. Revue de l’histoire des religions, In-8°, 31 p. Paris: E. Leroux.
  • SAMUEL, P. (1979): Amazonen, Kriegerinnen und Kraftfrauen. München: Trikont-Verlag.
  • SOBOL, D. J. (1972): The Amazons of Greek Mythology. New York: A. S. Barnes.
  • SPENCER, H. (1898): Principles of Sociology. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
  • STANTON, E. C. (1891): «The Matriarchate, or Mother-Age», address to National Council of Women of the United States, Washington, in Transactions of The National Council of Women of the Unites States (Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott), pp. 218-227.
  • STARCKE, C. N. (1889): The primitive family in its origin and development. New York: Appleton.
  • TÖNNIES, F. (1887): Community and Civil Society. Oxford: Jose Harris.
  • TYLOR, E. B. (1871): Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art, and custom. London: Murray.
  • TYLOR, E. B. (1889): «On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions; Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent», The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 18, pp. 245-272.
  • TYLOR, E. B. (1896): «The matriarchal family system», Nineteenth century, vol. 40 (july-december), pp. 81-96.
  • WEBBER, M. (1907): Ehefrau und Mutter in der Rechtsentwicklung, eine Einführung. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
  • WEBSTER WILDE, L. (1999): On the Trail of the Women Warriors: The Amazons in Myth and History. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • WRIGHT, F. A. (1921): Feminism in Greek literature from Homer to Aristotle. London: Routledge.
  • WESTERMARCK, E. (1891): The History of Human Marriage. London: McMillan.
  • YOUNG, R. M. (1990): «Herbert Spencer and inevitable progress». G. Marsden, ed. Victorian Values. Longman.
  • ZIMMER, H. (1898): Matriarchy among the Picts. Edimburgh: Norman Macleod.
  • ZMIGRODSKI, M. (1886): Die Mutter bei den Völkern des Arischen Stammes: Eine Anthropologisch Historische Skizze als Beitrag zur Lösung der Frauenfrage. München: T. Ackermann.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet