Impacto de la comunicación en Twitter en el movimiento ambientalista durante la COP15

  1. Rodríguez Hernández, Jonattan 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Revista de comunicación

ISSN: 1684-0933 2227-1465

Year of publication: 2024

Volume: 23

Issue: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.26441/RC23.1-2024-3383 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista de comunicación

Abstract

The research analyzes the Twitter network made up of users and their interactions during the Conference of the Parties (COP) COP15 held in Montreal from December 7 to 19, 2022. The main objective is to measure the characteristics of the network and identify the key players in the conversation and the main topics addressed. We also sought to recognize if there was any relationship between the format of the messages and the level of engagement. To carry out the analysis, we used a methodology that combined quantitative and qualitative social network analysis techniques. The results suggest that communication through Twitter was a key factor in the successful mobilization of the environmental movement during COP15 and in raising awareness of the need to take concrete actions to address climate change. Likewise, the highest engagement was generated by mostly critical and urgent messages, focused on the need to take concrete action to address the biodiversity and climate change crisis. This reflects a separation between the activism reflected in the network and the scientific and political leadership present at the Summit.

Bibliographic References

  • Ahrens, J. M. (2017, 2 de junio). Trump retira a EE UU del Acuerdo de París contra el cambio climático. El País. https://acortar.link/6xbcPS
  • Avaaz.org [@Avaaz]. (s.f.). Tuits [Twitter profile]. Twitter. Recuperado el 27 de febrero de 2023, https://twitter.com/Avaaz
  • Avaaz.org [@Avaaz]. (2022, 14 de diciembre). M. le Président @emmanuelmacron, avez vous lu @Le_Figaro et @libe ce matin dans votre avion pour assister au match #francemaroc? Dans la bataille pour sauver notre planète, nous sommes déjà entrés dans les prolongations. #COP15 https://bit.ly/3xYeQxi [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/3ktIuYc
  • Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485
  • Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2019). The road to Paris: Contending climate governance discourses in the post-Copenhagen era. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1150777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1150777
  • Barbosa dos Santos, M. L., Jaramillo Castro, O., & Aguirre Azócar, D. (2021). “Vital testimonio confirmó…”: Polarización de fuentes y redes en el Caso Catrillanca en Twitter. Cuadernos. info, (49), 26-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/cdi.49.27509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.49.27509
  • Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 361-362. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
  • Blue Heart Organization [@BlueEarthOrgan1]. (2022, 9 de diciembre). This #COP15 as women in Mombasa we are asking for: 1. More participation in conferences 2. Invest in grassroots that are working on restoration 3. Stop oppressive practices toward communities in the name of conservation 4. Fund our initiatives. #ClimateStrike #1MillionSpecies [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/3SAlCmH
  • Boynton, G. R. (2010). COP15-Voice. Internet, Politics, Policy 2010: An Impact Assessment, Oxford Internet Institute.
  • Brand, E., & Gómez, H. (2006). Análisis de redes sociales como metodología de investigación. Elementos básicos y aplicación. La Sociología en sus Escenarios, (13), 1–28. https://hdl.handle.net/10495/2542
  • Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the'urban'politics of climate change. Environmental politics, 14(1), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178
  • Carrasco Polaino, R., Villar Cirujano, E., & Tejedor Fuentes, L. (2018). Twitter como herramienta de comunicación política en el contexto de referéndum independentista catalán: asociaciones ciudadanas frente a instituciones públicas. Icono 14, 16(1), 64-85. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1134
  • Carrasco Polaino, R., Lafuente-Pérez, P., & Luna-García, Á. (2022). Twitter como canal para el activismo hacia el cambio climático durante la COP26. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 28(3), 511-523. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/esmp.80647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.80647
  • Chan, S., Hale, T., Deneault, A., Shrivastava, M., Mbeva, K., Chengo, V., & Atela, J. (2022). Assessing the effectiveness of orchestrated climate action from five years of summits. Nature Climate Change, 12(7), 628-633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01405-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01405-6
  • Chang, C., Armsworth, P., & Masuda, Y. (2022). Environmental Discourse Exhibits Consistency and Variation across Spatial Scales on Twitter. Bioscience, 72, 789 - 797. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac051
  • Cherven, K. (2015). Mastering Gephi network visualization. Packt Publishing Ltd.
  • Clauset, A., Newman, M. E., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical review E, 70(6), 066111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
  • Colina, M., Colina, K., Fernández, A., Maia, M., & Torrealba, D. (2021). Un recorrido electoral en Twitter Venezuela durante el periodo enero de 2019 a diciembre de 2020. Espacios, 42(12), 94-114. https://dx.doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a21v42n12p08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a21v42n12p08
  • Coppock, A., Guess, A., & Ternovski, J. (2016). When Treatments are Tweets: A Network Mobilization Experiment over Twitter. Political Behavior, 38, 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11109-015-9308-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9308-6
  • Dahal, B., Kumar, S. A., & Li, Z. (2019). Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets. Social network analysis and mining, 9, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0568-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0568-8
  • Diffusion France payée: Libération, Le Monde et Le Parisien en forme en août. (2022, 6 de octubre). 100%Media, de https://bit.ly/3IVaxJC
  • Dikmen, A. (2020). Global Climate Governance between State and Non-State Actors: Dynamics of Contestation and Re-Legitimation. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(Özel Sayı), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.14782/marmarasbd.763831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14782/marmarasbd.763831
  • Eurobarómetro. (2021). EU citizens’ knowledge and attitudes towards Science and Technology. Special barometrer 516 [Conjunto de datos] https://bit.ly/3Z8iz7y
  • Frenkel, S. (2022, 11 de julio). Todo lo que debes saber sobre los bots de Twitter, y su relación con la compra de Elon Musk. The New York Times. https://nyti.ms/3Rt0JHE
  • Fundación BBVA. (2008). Percepciones y actitudes de los españoles hacia el calentamiento global. https://bit.ly/3JtGRR0
  • Gálvez, C. (2018). El campo de investigación del Análisis de Redes Sociales en el área de las Ciencias de la Documentación: un análisis de co-citación y co-palabras. Revista general de información y documentación, 28(2), 455. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/RGID.62834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.62834
  • Garza, C. H. (2021). Narrativas en red: dominación o agencia en discursos de Twitter y YouTube frente al fenómeno del feminicidio en México. Virtualis, 12(23), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.46530/virtualis.v12i23.389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46530/virtualis.v12i23.389
  • Giuffredi-Kähr, A., Petrova, A., & Malär, L. (2022). Sponsorship Disclosure of Influencers – A Curse or a Blessing? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 57(1), 18-34. https://bit.ly/3SC92TY DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221075686
  • Gomez Carrasco, P., & Michelon, G. (2017). The Power of Stakeholders' Voice: The Effects of Social Media Activism on Stock Markets. Business Strategy and The Environment, 26, 855-872. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.1973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1973
  • Gong ZH, Lyford C. Using Social Media for More Engaged Users and Enhanced Health Communication in Diabetes Care. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 2022, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276211064832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276211064832
  • González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A. et al. The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network. Scientific Reports 1, 197 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197
  • Grandjean, M. (2015). Gephi: Introduction to network analysis and visualization. Disponible en: https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_0F0EB41780EB.P001/REF.pdf
  • Guidry, J., Waters, R., & Saxton, G. (2014). Moving Social Marketing Beyond Personal Change to Social Change: Strategically Using Twitter to Mobilize Supporters into Vocal Advocates. Journal of Social Marketing, 4, 240-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-02-2014-0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-02-2014-0014
  • Hagen, B. (2015). Public Perception of Climate Change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758558
  • Hanneman, R. A. (2000). Introducción a los métodos del análisis de redes sociales. Redes.
  • Hansen, Derek; Shneiderman, Ben; Smit & Marc A. (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382229-1.00011-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382229-1.00011-4
  • Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of environmental policy & planning, 7(3), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646
  • Hodges, H., & Stocking, G. (2016). A pipeline of tweets: environmental movements’ use of Twitter in response to the Keystone XL pipeline. Environmental Politics, 25, 223 - 247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1105177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1105177
  • Horstink, L. (2017). Online participation and the new global democracy: Avaaz, a case study. Global Society, 31(1), 101-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1235552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1235552
  • Hutchins, B. (2016). The Many Modalities of Social Networking: The Role of Twitter in Greens Politics. Environmental Communication, 10, 25 - 42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.966853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.966853
  • Hutchinson, J. (2021). Blocked by YouTube? Unseen digital intermediaries for social imaginaries in the Asia Pacific. Media International Australia, 181(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211017917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211017917
  • Ivanova, M. (2016). Good COP, Bad COP: Climate Reality after Paris. Global Policy, 7, 411-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12370
  • Jacomy M, Venturini T, Heymann S, Bastian M (2014) ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software. PLoS ONE 9(6): e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
  • Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global environmental change, 32, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010
  • Junsheng, H., Akhtar, R., Masud, M. M., Rana, M. S., & Banna, H. (2019). The role of mass media in communicating climate science: An empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117934
  • Khokhar, D. (2015). Gephi cookbook. Packt Publishing Ltd.
  • Kirilenko, A. P., & Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide. Global environmental change, 26, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008
  • Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New media & society, 17(8), 1241-1257. https://10.1177/1461444814522952nms.sagepub.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952
  • Lancia, F. (2010) Word co-occurrence similarity in meaning. In S. Salvatore & J. Valsiner ( E d s.) Mind as infinite dimensionality. Roma: Firera Publishing Group.
  • Lavender, J. (2017). El cambio de código en los hashtags: Expansión de audiencia y afiliación en una comunidad multilingüe. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 10(2), 297-318. https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2017-0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2017-0009
  • Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Howe, P. (2013). Climate change in the American mind: Americans' global warming beliefs and attitudes in April 2013. Yale University and George Mason University New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298705
  • Leong, C., Pan, S., Bahri, S., & Fauzi, A. (2018). Social media empowerment in social movements: power activation and power accrual in digital activism. European Journal of Information Systems, 28, 173 - 204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1512944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1512944
  • López-Navarrete, A. J., Cabrera-Méndez, M., Díez-Somavilla, R., & Calduch-Losa, Á. (2021). Fórmula para medir el engagement del espectador en YouTube: investigación exploratoria sobre los principales youtubers españoles. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 12(1), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM000013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM000013
  • Lövbrand, E., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B. O. (2017). Making climate governance global: how UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 580-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1319019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1319019
  • Lozares Colina, C. (1996). La teoría de redes sociales. Papers: revista de sociología, (48), 103-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v48n0.1814
  • Macron, E. [@EmmanuelMacron]. (2022, 17 de diciembre). À quelques jours de la fin de la COP 15 biodiversité de Montréal, le message que j'adresse à nos partenaires est le suivant : ne prenons pas de petites décisions, faisons le maximum ! Portons ensemble l'accord le plus ambitieux qui soit. Le monde en a besoin. [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/3Sw3I4q
  • Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. K. (2011). Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PloS one, 6(3), e17571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017571
  • Marini, C. y D’Andrea, A. (2015): T-Lab plus version. Roccasecca (Italia).
  • Mendez Santos, María del Carmen (2020). La construcción de la identidad lingüística de Santiago Abascal en Twitter. Revista Estudios del Discurso Digital (REDD), (3), 52-79 https://doi.org/10.24197/redd.3.2020.50-77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24197/redd.3.2020.50-77
  • Molina, J. L. (2004). La ciencia de las redes. Apuntes de Ciencia y Tecnología, 11(1), 36-42.
  • Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sainz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079
  • Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Climate Change, 1(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11
  • National Science Board (2018). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding (Science and Engineering Indicators). Arlington, VA https://bit.ly/2oFdl3g
  • Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis) trust science. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 36-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214555474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214555474
  • Padilla, G., & Rodríguez, J. (2022a). International Youth Movements for Climate Change: The# FridaysForFuture Case on Twitter. Sustainability, 15(1), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010268
  • Padilla, G., & Rodríguez, J. (2022b). Sostenibilidad en TikTok tras la COVID-19. Los influencers virales en español y sus micro-acciones. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, (28), 573-585. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/esmp.81133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.81133
  • Pan, S. L., Chou, J., Morrison, A. M., Huang, W. S., & Lin, M. C. (2018). Will the future be greener? The environmental behavioral intentions of university tourism students. Sustainability, 10(3), 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030634
  • Patterson, S., & Mann, M. (2022, 14 noviembre). Public Disapproval of Disruptive Climate Change Protests. Penn Center for Science, Sustainability, and the Media. https://bit.ly/3m9CfJI
  • Phadke, R. (2015). Behind the Walls: Manifestations of Place and Space at COP21. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2015.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2015.008
  • Plumer, B., & Popovich, N. (2021, 29 octubre). Calentamiento global: las medidas actuales no bastan. The New York Times. https://nyti.ms/3SvFA1L
  • Polaino, R. C., Cirujano, E. V., & Cárdaba, M. Á. M. (2021). El pulso pro-vacunas vs antivacunas en Twitter: redes, actores y" engagement". In Oportunidades para la participación y la democratización de las organizaciones en el siglo XXI (pp. 309-322). Dykinson. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2gz3tt5.19
  • Reuters Institute. (2022). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022. https://bit.ly/3Z4mN05
  • Rivas-de-Roca, R. (2020). La configuración del fenómeno ecologista #FridaysForFuture como proceso de opinión pública digital en España. Dígitos. Revista de Comunicación Digital, 6, 79-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/rd.v1i6.162
  • Rodríguez, J. A. (1995): Análisis estructural y de redes. Cuadernos Metodológicos, 16. Madrid, CIS
  • Roxburgh, N., Guan, D., Shin, K. J., Rand, W., Managi, S., Lovelace, R., & Meng, J. (2019). Characterising climate change discourse on social media during extreme weather events. Global environmental change, 54, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.004
  • Sanz, L. (2003). Análisis de redes sociales: o cómo representar las estructuras sociales subyacentes. Apuntes de ciencia y tecnología, 7, 21-29 https://bit.ly/3SzZbOm
  • Scaramuzzino, G., & Scaramuzzino, R. (2017). The weapon of a new generation?—Swedish Civil Society Organizations’ use of social media to influence politics. Journal of information technology & politics, 14(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1276501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1276501
  • Seo, S. (2017). Beyond the Paris Agreement: Climate change policy negotiations and future directions. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 9, 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/RSP3.12090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12090
  • Sharma, S. K., & Hoque, X. (2017). Sentiment predictions using support vector machines for odd-even formula in Delhi. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 9(7), 61-69. http://10.5815/ijisa.2017.07.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2017.07.07
  • SocialInsider (2022). 2022 Social Media Industry Benchmarks - Know Exactly Where You Stand in Your Market. https://bit.ly/3E1UUxW
  • Sousa, S., Correia, E., Leite, J., & Viseu, C. (2021). Environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior of higher education students: a case study in Portugal. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(4), 348-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1838122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1838122
  • Sued, G. E., Castillo-González, M. C., Pedraza, C., Flores-Márquez, D., Álamo, S., Ortiz, M., ... & Arroyo, R. E. (2022). Vernacular visibility and algorithmic resistance in the public expression of Latin American feminism. Media International Australia, 183(1), 60-76. https://10.1177/1329878X211067571journals.sagepub.com/home/mia DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211067571
  • Theocharis, Y., Vitoratou, S., & Sajuria, J. (2017). Civil Society in Times of Crisis: Understanding Collective Action Dynamics in Digitally-Enabled Volunteer Networks. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 22, 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12194
  • Torrijos, J. L. R., & Vegas, X. R. (2017). Accountability en las redes sociales. Libros de estilo en continua evolución y retroalimentación a través de Twitter. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (72), 915-941. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1200
  • Tornos Inza, E. (2020). Tasa de interacción (engagement) en Twitter. Related: Marketing. https://bit.ly/3T5lXhf
  • Trudeau, J. [@JustinTrudeau]. (2022, 19 de diciembre). Historic. That’s what negotiators, leaders, and activists are calling the deal the world has reached in Montreal on protecting nature. Canada stepped up as host location for these #COP15 negotiations – and drove an ambitious deal – because we knew how much this mattered. [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/3mcSUMg
  • Ure, M. (2018). Engagement estratégico y encuentro conversacional en los medios sociales. Revista de comunicación, 17(1), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC17.1-2018-A10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26441/RC17.1-2018-A10
  • Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 920 - 942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375
  • Victor, D. (1995). On writing good histories of climate change and testing social science theories. Climatic Change, 29, 363-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092423
  • Von der Leyen, U. [@vonderleyen]. (2022, 19 de diciembre). I welcome the historic outcome of #COP15. The world has agreed on unprecedented and measurable nature protection and restoration goals and on a Global Biodiversity Fund. And investing into nature also means fighting climate change. The EU will stay the course. #NextGenerationEU [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/41vjn7X
  • Vu, H. T., Blomberg, M., Seo, H., Liu, Y., Shayesteh, F., & Do, H. V. (2021). Social media and environmental activism: Framing climate change on Facebook by global NGOs. Science communication, 43(1), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470209716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971644
  • Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young consumers' intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, (135), 732-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2013). Análisis de redes sociales. Métodos y aplicaciones (Vol. 10). CIS-Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Zárate, P. (2022, 15 diciembre). El Francia-Marruecos (45.1 %) arrasa con récord y facilita el buen debut de «Fuerza de paz» (10.8 %) entre las series de La 1. Vertele. https://bit.ly/3koWnqQ
  • Zou, Y., Fu, Y., Yang, L., Wan, X., Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2017). China and COP 15: a path for responsible environmental power. Biodiversity Science, 25, 1169-1175. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2017246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2017246