Datos normativos, fiabilidad y validez de las escalas de trastornos de la personalidad del NEO PI-R

  1. Ana Sanz-García
  2. María Paz García-Vera
  3. Jesús Sanz
Journal:
Psicología conductual = behavioral psychology: Revista internacional de psicología clínica y de la salud

ISSN: 1132-9483

Year of publication: 2024

Volume: 32

Issue: 1

Pages: 41-63

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicología conductual = behavioral psychology: Revista internacional de psicología clínica y de la salud

Abstract

There is increasing interest in understanding personality disorders (PDs) from the five-factor model. Miller et al. (2005) and Costa and McCrae (2005) proposed two sets of scales based on the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) facets to assess DSM-5 PDs. There are Spanish norms for the scales of Miller et al. (2005) based on personnel selection samples, but they are not appropriate for contexts with low social desirability. Normative, reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity data are presented for both sets of scales with volunteers from the general Spanish population (N= 682). The internal consistency and convergent/discriminant validity indices were excellent or good for all scales, especially for those of Miller et al. (2005). The differences between the sample of volunteers and that of personnel selection (d= 0.61) and between males and females (d= 0.34-0.38) justify the development of norms for the two sets of PD scales for situations of low social desirability and separate for males and females. Their usefulness in different contexts is discussed.

Bibliographic References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1995). DSM-IV. Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales (4ª ed.). Masson. (Orig. 1994).
  • American Psychiatric Association (2014). Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales (5ª ed.; DSM-5). Editorial Médica Panamericana. (Orig. 2013).
  • Caballo, V. E., Guillén, J. L., Salazar, I. C. y Irurtia, M. J. (2011). Estilos y trastornos de personalidad: características psicométricas del "Cuestionario exploratorio de personalidad-III" (CEPER-III). Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 19(2), 277- 302.
  • Colodro, J., López-García, J. J., Mezquita, L., Colodro-Conde, L., Ibáñez, M. I., Edo, S., Villa, E. y Ortet, G. (2018). Five-factor model of personality disorders: Spanish normative data and validation. Anales de Psicología, 34(2), 264-273. doi: 10.6018/analesps.34.2.289271
  • Costa, P. T., Jr. y McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO FFI). Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr. y McCrae, R. R. (1999). Inventario de personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI R). Inventario NEO reducido de cinco factores (NEO FFI). Manual. TEA Ediciones.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr. y McCrae, R. R. (2005). A five-factor model perspective on personality disorders. En S. Strack (dir.), Handbook of personology and psychopathology (pp. 257- 270). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr. y McCrae, R. R. (2008). Inventario de personalidad NEO revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO reducido de cinco factores (NEO-FFI). Manual (3ª ed. rev. y ampliada). TEA Ediciones.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr. y McCrae, R. R. (2009). The five-factor model and the NEO inventories. En J. N. Butcher (dir.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 299-322). Oxford University Press.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A. y McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322-331. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
  • Hernández, A., Ponsoda, V., Muñiz, J., Prieto, G. y Elosua, P. (2016). Revisión del modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España. Papeles del Psicólogo, 37(3), 192- 197.
  • John, O. P. (2021). History, measurement, and conceptual elaboration of the Big‑Five trait taxonomy: the paradigm matures. En O. P. John y R. W. Robins (dirs.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp. 35-82). Guilford.
  • Kaiser, T. (2019). Nature and evoked culture: sex differences in personality are uniquely correlated with ecological stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 148, 67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.011
  • Lynam, D. R. y Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(3), 401-412. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.401
  • McCrae, R. R. y Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood. A five factor theory perspective (2ª ed.). Guilford.
  • Miller, J. D., Bagby, R. M., Pilkonis, P. A., Reynolds, S. K. y Lynam, D. R. (2005). A simplified technique for scoring DSM-IV personality disorders with the five-factor model. Assessment, 12(4), 404-415. doi: 10.1177/1073191105280987
  • Miller, J. D. y Lynam, D. R. (2008). Dependent personality disorder: comparing an expert generated and empirically derived five-factor model personality disorder count. Assessment, 15(1), 4-15. doi: 10.1177/1073191107306095
  • Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Rolland, J.-P., De Fruyt, F., Reynolds, S. K., Pham-Scottez, A., Baker, S. R. y Bagby, R. M. (2008). Scoring the DSM-IV personality disorders using the fivefactor model: development and validation of normative scores for North American, French, and Dutch-Flemish samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22(5), 433-450. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2008.22.5.433
  • O’Connor, B. P. (2017). Robustness. En T. A. Widiger (dir.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 151-171). Oxford University Press.
  • Oltmanns, T. F. y Powers, A. D. (2012). Gender and personality disorders. En T. A. Widiger (dir.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 206-218). Oxford University Press.
  • Samuel, D. B. y Widiger, T. A. (2004). Clinicians’ personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(3), 286-308. doi: 10.1521/pedi.18.3.286.35446
  • Samuel, D. B. y Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(8), 1326-1342. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002
  • Sanz, J. (2007). Algunos problemas con la utilización de la adaptación española del Inventario clínico multiaxial de Millon-II (MCMI-II) con fines diagnósticos. Clínica y Salud, 18(3), 287-304.
  • Sanz, J. (2018). La evaluación de la personalidad mediante los inventarios NEO. En J. L. Graña Gómez, M. E. de la Peña Fernández y J. M. Andreu Rodríguez (dirs.), Manual docente de psicología clínica legal y forense (3ª ed., vol. 1, pp. 1-74). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Sanz, J. y García-Vera, M. P. (2009). Nuevos baremos para la adaptación española del Inventario de personalidad NEO revisado (NEO PI-R): fiabilidad y datos normativos en voluntarios de la población general. Clínica y Salud, 20(2), 131-144.
  • Sanz, J., Gil, F., García-Vera, M. P. y Barrasa, Á. (2008). Needs and cognition/behavior patterns at work and the big five: an assessment of the Personality and Preference InventoryNormative (PAPI-N) from the perspective of the five-factor model. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(1), 46-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00408.x
  • Sanz, J., Silva, F. y Avia, M.D. (1999). La evaluación de la personalidad desde el modelo de los “cinco grandes”: el “Inventario de cinco factores NEO” de Costa y McCrae. En F. Silva (dir.), Avances en evaluación psicológica (pp. 171 234). Promolibro.
  • Sanz-García, A., García-Vera, M. P. y Sanz, J. (2023). Is it time to replace the Big Five personality model? Factorial structure of the NEO PI-R in a community sample of Spanish adults. The Journal of General Psychology. Avance en línea de la publicación. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2023.2261136
  • Schmitt, D. P., Long, A. E., McPhearson, A., O'Brien, K., Remmert, B. y Shah, S. H. (2017). Personality and gender differences in global perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 52(Supl. 1), 45-56. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12265
  • Volkert, J., Gablonski, T. y Rabung, S. (2018). Prevalence of personality disorders in the general adult population in Western countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 213(6), 709-715. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.202
  • Watson, D. y Clark, L. A. (2020). Personality traits as an organizing framework for personality pathology. Personality and Mental Health, 14(1), 51-75. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1458
  • Widiger, T. A. y Costa, P. T., Jr. (dirs.). (2013). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3ª ed.). American Psychological Association.
  • Widiger, T. A., Gore, W. L., Crego, C., Rojas, S. L. y Oltmanns, J. R. (2017). Five factor model and personality disorder. En T. A. Widiger (dir.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 449-478). Oxford University Press.
  • Widiger, T. A., Trull, T. J., Clarkin, J. F., Sanderson, C. y Costa, P. T., Jr. (2002). A description of the DSM-IV personality disorders with the five-factor model of personality. En P. T. Costa Jr. y T. A. Widiger (dirs.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2ª ed., pp. 89-99). American Psychological Association.
  • Winsper, C., Bilgin, A., Thompson, A., Marwaha, S., Chanen, A., Singh, S., Wang, A. y Furtado, V. (2020). The prevalence of personality disorders in the community: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 216(2), 69-78. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.166
Data source: Dialnet