Effective Stance in Conservative Newspaper Opinion Articles on Irregular Immigration and Refugee Humanitarian Crises

  1. Marta Carretero 1
  2. Elena Domínguez Romero 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España
Revista:
Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses: RAEI

ISSN: 0214-4808,  2171-861X

Año de publicación: 2024

Título del ejemplar: Social phenomena and their discursive construction through CADS

Número: 41

Páginas: 7-29

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14198/RAEI.2024.41.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

Otras publicaciones en: Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses: RAEI

Resumen

This paper presents a quantitative and contrastive analysis of expressions of effective stance in conservative newspaper opinion articles related to irregular immigration and humanitarian crises involving refugees in both English and Spanish contexts. Drawing upon the seminal works of Langacker (2013) and Marín-Arrese (2021a, 2021b, 2023), the study examines six fundamental categories of effective stance expressions established according to factors such as orientation towards self or others, degree of control about the realisation of the event, and agreement with social norms. The dataset under examination comprises a 120,000-word corpus of opinion articles obtained from two conservative newspapers, The Telegraph from the United Kingdom and El Mundo from Spain. The words are evenly distributed, with each newspaper contributing 30,000 words in articles pertaining to three humanitarian crises involving refugees: Syria (2015), Afghanistan (2021), and Ukraine (2022-2023), and 30,000 words relating to articles on irregular immigration coinciding in time with each of the three refugee crises. The primary objective of the paper is to discern notable differences between the two newspapers and across the different refugee and irregular immigration crises under investigation. The analysis of the results, which uncover a larger number of effective stance expressions in the English subcorpus as well as distributional differences of subcategories across the subcorpora in both languages, provides a valuable understanding of the intricate patterns of usage and distribution of effective stance expressions within the realm of newspaper discourse, thereby enriching our comprehension of journalistic portrayals concerning the complexity of refugee crises and migratory movements.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alcaraz-Mármol, Gema and Jorge Soto-Almela. 2022. “Refugees’ Dehumanization in the Spanish Media: A Corpus-Assisted Study within the Semantic Preference Framework.” Applied Linguistics Review 13.5: 791-817. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0069.
  • Boye, Kasper. 2010. “Evidence for what? Evidentiality and Scope.” STUF – Language Typology and Universals 63: 290-307.
  • Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219036
  • Boye, Kasper. 2023. “Propositions and States of Affairs: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach.” In Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie / Propositional Arguments in Cross-Linguistic Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues, edited by Jutta M. Hartmann and Angelika Wöllstein, 85-114. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
  • De Rosa, Annamaria Silvana, Elena Bocci and Sara Proietti. 2023. “(Im)migration in Italian Online Press through the Lens of the Social Representations Theory.” International Review of Sociology 33.1: 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2023.2230036
  • Domínguez romero, Elena. 2023. “Ver-Based Evidential Re/Positioning Strategies in Conservative Digital Newspaper Readers’ Comments on Controversial Immigration Policies in Spanish.” Languages 8.3: 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030171
  • DuBois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, edited by Robert Englebretson, 139-182. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Islentyeva, Anna. 2020. Corpus-based Analysis of Ideological Bias: Migration in the British Press. London: Routledge.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 2007. “Constructing the Meanings of Personal Pronouns.” In Aspects of Meaning Construction, edited by Günter Radden, 171-187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. “Modals: Striving for Control.” In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús, and Johan van der Auwera, 3-55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Marín-arrese, Juana I. 2011. “Effective vs. Epistemic stance and Subjectivity in Political Discourse: Legitimising Strategies and Mystification of Responsibility.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, edited by Christopher Hart, 193-224. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Marín-arrese, Juana I. 2021a. “Stance, Emotion and Persuasion: Terrorism and the Press.” Journal of Pragmatics 177: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.022
  • Marín-arrese, Juana I. 2021b. “Winds of War: Epistemic and Effective Control in Political Discourse”, Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación / Culture, Language and Representation xxvi: 289-307. https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.5858
  • Marín-arrese, Juana I. 2023. “Epistemic and Effective Stance and the Expression of Inter/subjectivity.” In Stance, Inter/Subjectivity and Identity in Discourse, edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Laura Hidalgo-Downing and Juan Rafael ZamoranoMansilla, 29-56. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Martín de la Rosa, Victoria, Elena Domínguez Romero, María Pérez Blanco and Juana I. Marín-Arrese. 2020. “Epistemic and Effective Stance in Political Discourse: The European Refugee Crisis.” In Positioning and Stance in Political Discourse: The Individual, the Party, and the Party Line, edited by Lawrence N. Berlin, 141- 156. Wilmington (DE): Vernon Press.
  • Martínez Lirola, María. 2023. “A Critical-Discourse Study of the Representation of Unaccompanied Foreign Minors in a Sample of the Spanish Press.” Lengua y Sociedad 22.1: 81-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v22i1.23944
  • Martínez Torvisco, Juan and Sonnia Chinea. 2020. “Immigrants and Refugees: Two Sides of the Same Problem. A Linguistic Analysis through Newspapers and Social Network in Spain 2006 and 2015.” International Review of Sociology 30.1: 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2020.1724370
  • Mora-lópez, Natalia and Sergio Ferrer-Navas. 2023. “An English-Spanish Contrastive Analysis of Effective Stance in Newspaper and Political Discourse.” In Stance, Inter/Subjectivity and Identity in Discourse, edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Laura Hidalgo-Downing and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla, 57-74. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Mustafa-Awad, Zahra and Monika Kirner-Ludwig. 2021. “Syrian Refugees in Digital News Discourse: Depictions and Reflections in Germany.” Discourse & Communication 15.1: 74-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320961636
  • O’Regan, Veronica and Elaine Riordan. 2018. “Comparing the Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Migrants in the Irish and UK Press: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics 17.6: 744-768. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17043.ore
  • Schröter, Juliane. 2023. “The Austrian Press Discourse on Refugees, Migrants, and Migration: A Corpus Linguistic Approach.” In The Representation of REFUGEES and MIGRANTS in European National Media Discourses from 2015 to 2017: A Contrastive Approach (Corpus Linguistics), edited by Annamária Fábián, 23-66. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66775-0_2.
  • Seo, Soomin and Sezgi Başak Kavakli. 2022. “Media Representations of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigrants: A Meta-analysis of Research.” Annals of the International Communication Association 46.3: 159-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2096663
  • Terrón-Caro, Teresa, Rocío Cárdenas-Rodríguez and Fabiola Ortega-de-Mora, 2022. “Discourse, Immigration and the Spanish Press: Critical Analysis of the Discourse on the Ceuta and Melilla Border Incident.” Societies 12.2: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020056
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet