Diseño y sistemas. El Metasistema

  1. Claudia A. Sánchez Orozco 1
  1. 1 Facultad de Bellas Artes de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Zeitschrift:
Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación. Ensayos

ISSN: 1853-3523,  1668-0227

Datum der Publikation: 2024

Titel der Ausgabe: Diseño y complejidad

Nummer: 228

Seiten: 37-51

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.18682/CDC.VI228.11320 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación. Ensayos

Zusammenfassung

Esta pesquisa explora a simplificação como o modo predominante de pensa-mento no design, bem como as consequências dessa forma de pensar nos sistemas eco-lógicos, sociais e econômicos dos quais depende nossa sobrevivência, desenvolvimento e bem-estar. Em resposta, o modelo do Metassistema nos aproxima do design sob a pers-pectiva de sistemas, com o propósito de compreender o design, seu comportamento e suas consequências em sistemas complexos através da exploração de suas relações e interações com outros sistemas. O Metassistema fornece um conjunto organizado de suposições sobre o design, que permite visualizar as consequências de nossas decisões, simular os comportamentos dos sistemas, bem como os impactos de decisões alternativas. Portanto, funciona como uma ferramenta didática e exploratória, e como um modelo para projetar cenários de desenvolvimento sustentável do design.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Ashby, W.R. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. En von Foerster, H. and Zopf, G.W. Jr. (Eds.), Principles of self-organization: Transactions of the University of Illinois Symposium (pp. 255-278). Pergamon Press.
  • Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), pp. 181–205. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X01001097
  • Andrews, E.S., Barthel, L., Beck, T. Benoît, C., Ciroth, A., Cucuzzella, C., Gensch, C., Hébert, J., Lesage, P., Manhart, A. y Mazeau, P., Mazjin, B., Methot, A., Moberg, A., Norris, G., Parent, J., Prakash, S., Revert, J., Weidema, B. (2009). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP]. https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2009%20-%20Guidelines%20for%20sLCA%20-%20EN.pdf
  • Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. Perseus Books.
  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. E.P. Dutton.
  • Bertalanffy, L. (1976). Teoría general de sistemas. Fondo de Cultura.
  • Bonsiepe, G. (2012). Diseño y crisis. Campgràfic.
  • Buchanan, R. (1995). Wicked problems in design thinking. En Margolín, V. y Buchanan, R. (Eds.), The idea of design (pp. 3-20). The MIT Press.
  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), pp. 5-21. https://web.mit.edu/jrankin/www/engin_as_lib_art/Design_thinking.pdf
  • Ciroth, A., Finkbeiner, M., Hildenbrand, J., Klöpffer, W., Mazjin, B., Prakash, S., Sonnemann, G., Traverso, M., Ugaya, C., Valdivia, S. y Vickery-Niederman, G. (2011). Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: Making informed choices on products. Paris: United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP], Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry [SETAC], Life Cycle Initiative [LCI]. https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/12/2011%20-%20Towards%20LCSA.pdf
  • Cooper, R. Press, M. (2009). El Diseño como experiencia: El papel del Diseño y los diseñadores en el siglo XXI. Gustavo Gili.
  • Gell-Mann, M. (1988). Simplicity and complexity in the description of nature. Engineering & Science, Spring edition, pp. 2-9.
  • Jonas, H. (1995). El principio de responsabilidad. Herder.
  • Koskinen, I. Zimmerman, J. Binder, T. Redström, J. Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice. From the lab, field and showroom. Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Maldonado, T. (1972). Design, nature, and revolution. Toward a critical ecology. Harper & Row.
  • Margolín, V. (2017). Construir un mundo mejor. Diseño y responsabilidad social. Designio.
  • Margolín, V. (Ed.) (1989). Introduction. En Design discourse (pp. 3-28). The University of Chicago Press.
  • McGillivray, M, Clarke, M. (Ed). (2006). Human well-being: Concepts and measures. En Understanding human well-being (pp.3-16). United Nations University Press. https://archive.unu.edu/unupress/sample-chapters/1130-UnderstandingHumanWell-Being.pdf
  • Meadows, D. (2009). Thinking in systems: A primer. Edited by Diana Wright, Sustainability Institute. Earthscan: London.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Opportunities and challenges for business and industry. Island Press. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.353.aspx.pdf
  • Morin, E. (1994). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. GEDISA.
  • Naciones Unidas. (1992). Declaración de Río sobre medio ambiente y desarrollo. Rio de Janeiro. www.un.org/spanish/esa/sustdev/documents/declaracionrio.htm
  • Naredo, J. (2010). Raíces económicas del deterioro ecológico y social: Más allá de los dogmas. Siglo XXI.
  • Papanek, V. (2009). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Thames & Hudson.
  • Remmen, A., Jensen, A.A., Frydendal, J. (2007). Life cycle management: A business guide to sustainability. United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP]. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/7556
  • Richardson, K., Midgley, G. (2007). Systems theory and complexity: Part 4. The evolution of systems thinking; E:CO Issue, 9(1-2). pp. 163-180. https://emergentpublications.com/ECO/issue_contents.aspx?Volume=9&Issue=1-2
  • Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S., Donges, J., Drüke, M., Fetzer, I., Bala, G., Blog, W., Feulner, G., Fiedler, S., Gerten, D., Gleeson, T., Hofmann, M., Huiskamp, W., Kummu, M., Mohan, Ch., Nogués-Bravo, D., …Rockström, J. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. III, Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Constanza, R., Svedin, U., ...Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2): 32. [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/
  • Shedroff N., (2009). Design is the problem: The future of design must be sustainable. Rosenfeld Media.
  • Slade,G. (2006). Made to break: Technology and obsolescence in america. Harvard University Press.
  • Warfield, J. (2006). An introduction to systems science. World Scientific Publishing.
  • Wolf, L. (1972). Ideología y producción. El diseño. A. Redondo World Conservation Union [IUCN], United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP],
  • World Wide Fund For Nature [WWF]. (1991). Caring for the earth. A strategy for sustainable living. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/CFE-003.pdf
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet