Theoretical perspectives: sociology and the conservation of scientific heritage

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alegre Ávila, J. M. A. (2018). “Del Eccehomo de Borja al San Jorge de San Miguel de Estella: la debida regulación de la profesión de Conservador-Restaurador” in Las profesiones del patrimonio cultural. eds. A. Galán-Pérez and D. Pardo (Albacete, Spain: ACRE, Asociación de Conservadores-Restauradores de España, Spanish Group of the International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works).
• Arroyo Serrano, S. (2022). Presentación: la necesidad de poner en valor el patrimonio filosófico. Monograma. Revista Iberoamericana de Cultura y Pensamiento. 10, 9–12. doi: 10.36008/monograma.2022.10.0307
• Avrami, E., Mason, R., and De La Torre, M. (2000) Values and heritage conservation: research report. Getty Conservation Institute. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10020/gci_pubs/values_heritage_research_report (Accessed January 8, 2023).
• Baginskas, A., Svirskis, G., and Miliauskas, R. (2009). The scientific heritage of professor Aron Gutman (commemorating the 10th anniversary of Aron Gutman’s death). Medicina 45:732. doi: 10.3390/medicina45090096
• Balke, F. (1999). “Dichter, Denker und Niklas Luhmann. Über den Sinnzwang in der Systemtheorie” in Widerstände der Systemtheorie: Kulturtheoretische Analyse der Werke von Luhmann. eds. C. Vismann and A. Koschorke (Berlin: Akademie Verlag), 135–158.
• Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. London: Fontana.
• Belishki, S., and Corr, S. (2019). Reflection on conservation-restoration practice today. A European perspective. Protection of cultural. Heritage 8, 15–28. doi: 10.35784/odk.1024
• Bliznikas, V. I., Norden, A. P., Shapukov, B. N., and Shirokov, A. P.. (1991). Scientific heritage of Boris Lukich Laptev (4/23/05–1/15/89). J. Sov. Math. 55, 2091–2100. doi: 10.1007/BF01095904
• Borisova, V. V. (2014). The scientific heritage of R.G. Nazirov. Vestnik Bashkirskogo Universiteta 19. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nauchnoe-nasledie-r-g-nazirova (Accessed October 7, 2024).
• Boudia, S. A. N. D., and Soubiran, S. (2013). Scientists and their cultural heritage: knowledge, politics and ambivalent relationships. Stud History Phil Sci Part A 44, 643–651. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.07.002
• Bucchi, M. (2013). Style in science communication. Public Underst. Sci. 22, 904–915. doi: 10.1177/0963662513498202
• Bucchi, M., and Trench, B. (Eds.) (2021). Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. New York: Routledge.
• Buchinger, E. (2012). Luhmann and the constructivist heritage. A critical reflection. Construct. Found. 8, 19–28.
• Bunsen, F. D. (1999). “Der Künstler in Niklas Luhmann”, "Gibt es eigentlich den Berliner Zoo noch?” in Erinnerungen an Niklas Luhmann. eds. T. M. Bardmann and D. Baecker (Konstanz: Universitätsverlag), 32–39.
• Calboreanu, A. (2004). The scientific heritage of Alexandru Proca and the quantum physics revolution. Roman. J. Physics 49, 3–11.
• Cánovas Fernández, C. (Ed.) (2021). Arte y ciencia del siglo XXI. CSIC: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Madrid.
• Carballeira Rivera, M. T. (2021). Patrimonio cultural Inmaterial. De los Castells al Camino de Santiago. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
• Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The information age I. The rise of network society. Oxford: Wiley.
• Castells, M. (2001a). The internet galaxy. Oxford: Wiley.
• Castells, M. (2001b). “Epilogue: Informationalism and the network society” in The hacker ethic. ed. P. Himanen (New York: Random House), 155–178.
• Castillo Ruiz, J. (2022). Los límites del patrimonio cultural. Principios para transitar por el desorden patrimonial. Madrid: Cátedra.
• Cercós i Raichs, R. (2017). “El pensamiento estético-pedagógico de Joseph Beuys: Entre la memoria y la performance.” Historia y memoria de la educación: HMe. Sociedad Española de Historia de la Educación. Available at: https://redined.educacion.gob.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11162/212500/Cercos.pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed March 6, 2022).
• Cevolini, A. (2006). Teoria e storia della schedatura. Storiografia 10, 51–76.
• Cevolini, A. (2008). La biblioteca cibernetica. Invito alla lettura di Heinz von Foerster. Bibliofilía 110, 73–79.
• Cevolini, A. (2016). Complessità e tecnologizzazione del sapere. Bibliofilia 118, 283–313.
• Chibirov, L. A. (2016). E.G. Pchelina’s scientific heritage as a model of interdisciplinary research. Izvestiya SOIGSI 19, 36–47.
• Compagnucci, L., and Spigarelli, F. (2020). The third Mission of the university: a systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technologi-cal Forecasting and Social Change. 161. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284
• De Giorgi Cezzi, G. (2009). ““La restauración de los bienes culturales en la legislación italiana reciente”, in El régimen jurídico de la restauración del patrimonio cultural” in Un estudio comparado de los ordenamientos italiano y español. eds. R. Barranco Vela, L. J. Sanchez-Mesa Martinez, and G. Piperata (Granada: Comares), 27–30.
• Draganov, M. (1992). Scientific heritage of social anthropology in Bulgaria and prospects for the future. Anthropol. J. Eur. Cult. 1, 53–67.
• Ebers, T. (2022). Filosofía y patrimonio cultural. Una aproximación a la filosofía en contextos museísticos. Monograma.Revista Iberoamericana De Cultura y Pensamiento. 10, 55–76. doi: 10.36008/monograma.2022.10.035
• Economou, M., Simpson, A., Lourenço, M. C., Nyst, N., and Soubiran, S. (2021). Universities, museums, collections and heritage: a time of challenge and change. Univ. Museums Collect. J. 13, 5–7.
• Esposito, E. (1995). Interaktion, Interaktivität und die Personalisierung der Massenmedien. Soziale Systeme 1, 225–259.
• Esposito, E. (1996). “Code und Form” in Systemtheorie der Literatur. eds. J. Fohrmann and H. Müller (München: Fink), 56–81.
• Fara, P. (1997). Scientific heritage. Studies Hist. Phil. Sci. Part A 28, 187–195. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(96)00001-5
• Fara, P. (2000). Isaac Newton lived here: sites of memory and scientific heritage. Br. J. Hist. Sci. 33, 407–426. doi: 10.1017/S0007087400004192
• Fazliakhmetov, I., and Yusupova, Z. (2018). Methodological heritage of Kazan scientists in the field of teaching the Russian language. IIOAB J. 9, 174–176.
• Fekrsanati, F. M., and Schimmeroth, G. (2023). From conservation to conversation. Introductory remarks. From conservation to conversation‘, rethinking collections care. Mark in motion. Available at: https://markk-hamburg.de/files/media/2023/05/MARKK_CtoC_230504_1_web-3.pdf (Accessed December 16, 2023).
• Ferrajoli, L. (2013). Los fundamentos de los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Trotta.
• Fonseca Martínez, A., and Brull González, M. (2020). Patrimonio cultural e identidad en las universidades. Conrado 16, 379–386.
• Foucault, M. (1969). What is an author? Available at: https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/624849/mod_resource/content/1/a840_1_michel_foucault.pdf (Accessed October 7, 2024).
• Fuchs, C. (2005). The internet as a self-organizing socio-technical system. Cybernetics and Human Knowing. 11, 57–81.
• Gachechiladze, R., Nikolaishvili, D., Bolashvili, N., and Jamaspashvili, N. (2017). Scientific heritage of professor Nikoloz Beruchashvili. Earth 6, 5–6. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.s.2017060501.25
• Grebnev, L. (2004). “Moor” comes back? He has not come yet… (to the discussion on the importance of K. Marx’s scientific heritage). Vopr. Ekon. 92–112. doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2004-9-92-112
• Haret, S., Baluta, A. V., and Andronie, M. (2010). Future developments of Henri Coanda’s scientific heritage in the field of economics, engineering and social sciences. INCAS Bulletin 2, 49–53. doi: 10.13111/2066-8201.2010.2.4.8
• Hargittai, E. (2007). The social, political, economic, and cultural dimension of search engines: an introduction. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12, 769–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00349.x
• Hinrichs, L., and Sartorius, A. (2021). Starting from Language: Joseph Beuys at 100. Berlin: Hamburger Bahnhof – Museum für Gegenwart.
• Koller, M. (2019). Die Grenzen der Kunst. Luhmanns gelehrte Poesie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
• Landow, G. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Lankes, R. D., Silverstein, J., and Nicholson, S. (2007). Participatory networks: the library as conversation. Ital. 26, 17–33. doi: 10.6017/ital.v26i4.3267
• Levy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence. Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
• Longo, M. (2005). “Doppia contingenza on line. Considerazioni teoriche sulla comunicazione in rete ”. In Immaginario e società globale. ed. A. Milanaccio Lecce: Manni. 71–91.
• Longo, M., and Magnolo, S. (2009). The author and authorship in the internet society. New perspectives for scientific communication. Curr. Sociol. 57, 829–850. doi: 10.1177/0011392109342221
• Lourenço, M. C., and Wilson, L. (2013). Scientific heritage: reflections on its nature and new approaches to preservation, study and access. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci Part A 44, 744–753. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.07.011
• Luhmann, N. (1987a). Die Richtigkeit soziologischer Theorie. Merkur 41, 36–49.
• Luhmann, N. (1987b). Archimedes und wir. Berlin: Merve Verlag.
• Luhmann, N. (1992). “Kommunikation mit Zettelkasten” in Universität als Milieu, N. Luhmann (Bielefeld: Haux), 53–61.
• Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
• Luhmann, N. (2005a). Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschften.
• Luhmann, N. (2008). “Unverständliche Wissenschaft. Probleme einer theorieeigenen Sprache” in Soziologische Aufklärung 3, N. Luhmann (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften), 193–201.
• Magar, V. (2023). “New Skills and Tools for Conservation Professionals in a Changing World” In From Conservation to Conversation. Rethinking collections care. eds. F. Fekrsanati and G. Schimmeroth (Ham-burg: Museum am Rothenbaum – Kulturen und Künste der Welt), 97–143. Available at: https://markk-hamburg.de/files/media/2023/05/MARKK_CtoC_230504_1_web-3.pdf
• Magnolo, S., and Pellerino, G. (2020). Diritto, Scienza, Società. Opportunità e rischi delle nuove tecnologie. Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.
• Magnolo, S., and Taurino, A. (2018). Il diritto, la Scienza e la Tecnologia. Opinião Jurídica. 16, 13–27. doi: 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v16i23.p13-27.2018
• Мakhat, D. (2021). Epistolary heritage of Siberian scientists: Unpublished letter of A.P. Okladnikov, V.E. Larichev, and F. Palashenkov. Eur. Union Scient. 3. doi: 10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2021.3.83.1259
• Marçal, H. (2021). “Towards a relational ontology of conservation”, In Proceedings of the 19th ICOM-CC Triennial Conference in Beijing. Beijing, China: International Council of Museums.
• Marçal, H. (2023). “Entangled ethics: heritage conservation, transmission and participation” in From conservation to conversation. Rethinking collections care. eds. F. Fekrsanati and G. Schimmeroth (Munich, Germany: MARKK-Mu-seum am Rothenbaum Kulturen und Künste). 131–141.
• Marçal, H., and GORDON, R. (2023). “Affirming future(s): towards a posthumanist conservation in practice” in Posthumanism in practice. eds. C. Daigle and M. Hayler (London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing), 165–178.
• Martínez Pino, J. (2012). La Comisión Franceschini para la salvaguardia del patrimonio italiano. Riesgo, oportunidad y tradición de una propuesta innovadora. Patrimonio Cultural y Derecho 16, 189–208.
• Muñoz Viñas, S. (2020). On the ethics of cultural heritage conservation. London: Archetype Publications.
• Pask, G. (1976). Conversation theory. Amsterdam-Oxford-NewYork: Elsevier.
• Piñeiro-Naval, V., and Frutos Esteban, F. J. (2023). El valor del patrimonio cultural en la era digital. Di-sertaciones. 16, 1–4. doi: 10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/disertaciones/a.12714
• Roberts, D. (1999). “Wissenschaft und Kunst. Gedanken zur soziologischen Imagination bei Niklas Luhmann” in in "Gibt es eigentlich den Berliner Zoo noch?" Erinnerungen an Niklas Luhmann. eds. T. M. Bardmann and D. Baecker (Konstanz: Universitätsverlag), 29–31.
• Rosell, A.R. (2000). Conservar el patrimonio científico: una cuestión de cultura. Mètode. 25. Available at: https://metode.es/revistas-metode/monograficos/conservar-y-actualizar-el-patrimonio-cientifico.html. (Accessed July 29, 2024).
• Rotaeche González de Urbieta, M. I. (2021). Ética y crítica de la conservación del patrimonio cultural. Madrid: Síntesis.
• Ruprecht, L. (2019). ““I as a text,” I as a dance: on the relationship of contemporary dance and contemporary poetry with reference to Anne Juren, Martina Hefter, Monika Rinck, and Philipp Gehmacher” in Dance and modernism in Irish and German literature and culture. eds. S. Egger, C. E. Foley, and M. Mills (Harper (London: Lexington Books), 175–190.
• Sánchez Cotta, A. (2022). El patrimonio filosófico inmaterial de la obra de Averroes. Monograma. Revista Iberoamericana de Cultura y Pensamiento. 10, 119–142. doi: 10.36008/monograma.2022.10.0333
• Schwanitz, D. (1999). “Niklas Luhmann artifex mundi” in Niklas Luhmann - Wirkungen eines Theoretikers. ed. R. Stichweh (Bielefeld: Transcript), 49–59.
• Shabambayeva, A. G., and Abdrahmanov, B. A. (2020). Life and scientific heritage of a. ZH. Mashanov. BULLETIN. Series Historical and socio-political sciences. 42, 38–44. doi: 10.51889/2020-1.2077-6861.04
• Shakirova, S. Y. (2017). Studying the scientific heritage of Babadjan Sanoi. Paradigmata poznání. 2, 31–34. doi: 10.24045/pp.2017.1.4
• Soubiran, S. (2008). What makes scientific communities think the preservation of their heritage is impor-tant? UMAC Journal. 1:14. doi: 10.18452/8627
• Stichweh, R. (2006). Die zwei Kulturen? Gegenwärtige Beziehungen von Natur- und Humanwissenschaften. Luzerner Universitätsreden. 18, 7–21.
• Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Titova, G. E., Shamrov, I. I., Kruglova, N. N., Morozova, N. M., Notov, A. A., and Osadtchiy, J. V. (2018). Professor Tatyana Batygina: scientific heritage. Int. J. Plant Reprod. Biol. 10, 157–160.
• UNESCO. (2014) Culture for Development Indicators. Methodology Manual. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark (Accessed October 7, 2024).
• Vanderstraeten, A. (2010). Scientific communication: sociology journal and publication practices. Sociology 44, 559–576. doi: 10.1177/0038038510362477
• Vanrell Vellosillo, M.V. (2019). Proposals for Data Organization and Visualization to Improve the Manage-ment and the Understanding of Complex Works. Conservar Património, 30, 117–130. doi: 10.14568/cp2016033
• Vaquer Caballería, A. (2005). La protección jurídica del patrimonio cultural inmaterial. Museos.es. 1, 88–99. Available: https://www.cultura.gob.es/dam/jcr:316434b1-cfda-4014-8b25-4b5cdb2073df/s2-7proteccionjuridica.pdf (Accessed July 29, 2024)
• Vecco, M. (2010). A definition of cultural heritage: from the tangible to the intangible. J. Cult. Herit. 11, 321–324. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006
• von Foerster, H. (1972). Responsibilities of competence. Journal of Cybernetics. 2, 1–6.
• von Foerster, H. (2008). Che significato avrà la tecnologia per i bibliotecari? (Una risposta). Bibliofilia 110, 79–91.