Planificación preparatoria digital en artroplastia total de cadera

  1. Andrés-Cano, P. 1
  2. Andrés-García, J.A. 2
  3. Chana-Rodríguez, F. 3
  4. Delgado-Martínez, A.D. 46
  5. Guerado, E. 5
  1. 1 Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
    info

    Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04vfhnm78

  2. 2 Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
    info

    Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar

    Cádiz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/040xzg562

  3. 3 Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón
  4. 4 Hospital Universitario de Jaén
    info

    Hospital Universitario de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02ecxgj38

  5. 5 Hospital Universitario Costa del Sol
  6. 6 Universidad de Jaén
    info

    Universidad de Jaén

    Jaén, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0122p5f64

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Revista de la Sociedad Andaluza de Traumatología y Ortopedia

ISSN: 1578-9756

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 36

Número: 3

Páginas: 9-28

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de la Sociedad Andaluza de Traumatología y Ortopedia

Resumen

La planificación preoperatoria de la artroplastia total de cadera es una fase fundamental para disminuir la incidencia de complicaciones y conseguir resultados clínicos consistentes y reproducibles. Gracias a la planificación preoperatoria, el cirujano puede identificar las dificultades quirúrgicas del paciente sobre las cuales es necesario actuar, permite anticipar instrumental o implantes específicos, facilita la comunicación y docencia entre compañeros y proporciona cobertura legal.La introducción de la radiología digital ha supuesto un verdadero avance en la evaluación radiográfica de los pacientes. Encontramos numerosas ventajas asistenciales, docentes e investiga-doras. Para realizar correctamente las técnicas de planificación preoperatoria en Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, así como para realizar diversas mediciones o colocar plantillas digitales, es necesario el uso de un software específico y conocer la magnificación de la radiografía. Para establecer la magnificación de la radiografía existen diversos sistemas de calibración como el uso de marcadores o la magnificación fija según la región anatómica a estudio.En este trabajo realizamos una revisión del estado actual de la planificación preoperatoria di-gital en la artroplastia de cadera, las ventajas que su realización de forma adecuada proporciona al cirujano y los recursos técnicos que son necesarios para poder realizarla de forma habitual en un servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allepuz AS-S, V; Espallargues, M; Sarria A. Hip and knee replacement in the Spanish National Health System. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. 2009; 53:290-299.
  • Della Valle AG, Padgett DE, Salvati EA. Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. JAmAcadOrthopSurg. 2005; 13:455-462.
  • Schmalzried TP. Preoperative templating and biomechanics in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2005; 28:s849-s851.
  • Berend KR, Sporer SM, Sierra RJ, Glassman AH, Morris MJ. Achieving stability and lower limb length in total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2011; 60:229-246.
  • Sculco PK, Cottino U, Abdel MP, Sierra RJ. Avoiding Hip Instability and Limb Length Discrepancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016; 47:327-334.
  • Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Soft tissue balancing: the hip. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17:17-22.
  • Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95:210-219.
  • McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77:865-869.
  • Clement ND, R SP-P, MacDonald D, Breusch SJ. Total hip replacement: increasing femoral offset improves functional outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016; 136:1317- 1323.
  • Mahoney CR, Pellicci PM. Complications in primary total hip arthroplasty: avoidance and management of dislocations. Instr Course Lect. 2003; 52:247-255.
  • Gonzalez DV, Comba F, Taveras N, Salvati EA. The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. IntOrthop. 2008; 32:289-294.
  • Tripuraneni KR, Archibeck MJ, Junick DW, Carothers JT, White RE. Common errors in the execution of preoperative templating for primary total hip arthroplasty. JArthroplasty. 2010; 25:1235-1239.
  • Whiddon DR, Bono JV, Lang JE, Smith EL, Salyapongse AK. Accuracy of digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. AmJOrthop (BelleMead NJ). 2011; 40:395-398.
  • Jassim SS, Ingham C, Keeling M, Wimhurst JA. Digital templating facilitates accurate leg length correction in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012; 78:344-349.
  • King RJ, Craig PR, Boreham BG, Majeed MA, Moran CG. The magnification of digital radiographs in the trauma patient: implications for templating. Injury. 2009; 40:173-176.
  • Bayne CO, Krosin M, Barber TC. Evaluation of the accuracy and use of x-ray markers in digital templating for total hip arthroplasty. JArthroplasty. 2009; 24:407-413.
  • Fitzgerald RH, Jr., Brindley GW, Kavanagh BF. The uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988:61-66.
  • Davidson D, Pike J, Garbuz D, Duncan CP, Masri BA. Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90:2000-2012.
  • The B, Diercks RL, van Ooijen PM, van Horn JR. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop. 2005; 76:78-84.
  • Kosashvili Y, Shasha N, Olschewski E, Safir O, White L, Gross A, et al. Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. CanJSurg. 2009; 52:6-11.
  • Berstock JR, Webb JC, Spencer RF. A comparison of digital and manual templating using PACS images. AnnRCollSurgEngl. 2010; 92:73-74.
  • Fridell K, Aspelin P, Fellander-Tsai L, Lundberg N. The effect of PACS on the practice of orthopaedic surgeons. J Telemed Telecare. 2011; 17:137-141.
  • White SP, Shardlow DL. Effect of introduction of digital radiographic techniques on pre-operative templating in orthopaedic practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005; 87:53-54.
  • Franken M, Grimm B, Heyligers I. A comparison of four systems for calibration when templating for total hip replacement with digital radiography. JBone Joint SurgBr. 2010; 92:136-141.
  • Wimsey S, Pickard R, Shaw G. Accurate scaling of digital radiographs of the pelvis. A prospective trial of two methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:1508-1512.
  • Heep H, Xu J, Lochteken C, Wedemeyer C. A simple and convenient method guide to determine the magnification of digital X-rays for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2012; 4:e12.
  • Sinclair VF, Wilson J, Jain NP, Knowles D. Assessment of accuracy of marker ball placement in pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29:1658-1660.
  • Heinert G, Hendricks J, Loeffler MD. Digital templating in hip replacement with and without radiological markers. JBone Joint SurgBr. 2009; 91:459-462.
  • King RJ, Makrides P, Gill JA, Karthikeyan S, Krikler SJ, Griffin DR. A novel method of accurately calculating the radiological magnification of the hip. JBone Joint SurgBr. 2009; 91:1217-1222.
  • Baxter JA, Barlow T, Karthikeyan S, Mayo DJ, King RJ. The accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using two different scale markers: a comparative study. HipInt. 2012; 22:82-89.
  • Archibeck MJ, Cummins T, Tripuraneni KR, Carothers JT, Murray-Krezan C, Hattab M, et al. Inaccuracies in the Use of Magnification Markers in Digital Hip Radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016.
  • Varghese B, Muthukumar N, Balasubramaniam M, Scally A. Reliability of measurements with digital radiographs--a myth. Acta OrthopBelg. 2011; 77:622-625.
  • Khan F, Ahmad T, Condon F, Lenehan B. Review of quality of x-rays for templating for total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015; 81:72-76.
  • Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, Kim YJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90 Suppl 4:47-66.
  • Weber M, Woerner ML, Springorum HR, Hapfelmeier A, Grifka J, Renkawitz TF. Plain radiographs fail to reflect femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29:1661-1665.
  • Meermans G, Malik A, Witt J, Haddad F. Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469:1677- 1682.
  • Moskal JT, Capps SG. Improving the accuracy of acetabular component orientation: avoiding malposition. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:286-296.
  • Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004; 22:815-821.
  • Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467:119-127.
  • Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006; 58:294-300.
  • Marx A, von Knoch M, Pfortner J, Wiese M, Saxler G. Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006; 126:487-492.
  • Boudriot U, Hilgert J, Hinrichs F. Determination of the rotational center of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006; 126:417-420.
  • Heaver C, St Mart JP, Nightingale P, Sinha A, Davis ET. Measuring limb length discrepancy using pelvic radiographs: the most reproducible method. Hip Int. 2013:0.
  • Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft- tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Course Lect. 2005; 54:131-141.
  • de Beer J, McKenzie S, Hubmann M, Petruccelli D, Winemaker M. Influence of cementless femoral stems inserted in varus on functional outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2006; 49:407-411.
  • Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:500-509.
  • Rosler J, Perka C. The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2000; 24:23-27.
  • Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:414-420.
  • Terrier A, Levrero Florencio F, Rudiger HA. Benefit of cup medialization in total hip arthroplasty is associated with femoral anatomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472:3159- 3165.
  • Young EY, Gebhart J, Cooperman D, Ahn NU. Are the left and right proximal femurs symmetric? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471:1593-1601.
  • Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016; 15:115.
  • Maini L, Sharma A, Jha S, Sharma A, Tiwari A. Three-dimensional printing and patient- specific pre-contoured plate: future of acetabulum fracture fixation? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016.
  • Mulford JS, Babazadeh S, Mackay N. Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: review of current and future applications. ANZ J Surg. 2016; 86:648-653.
  • Kim HN, Liu XN, Noh KC. Use of a real-size 3D-printed model as a preoperative and intraoperative tool for minimally invasive plating of comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10:91.
  • Zerr J, Chatzinoff Y, Chopra R, Estrera K, Chhabra A. Three-dimensional printing for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty revision: case report. Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 45:1431-1435.
  • Chana-Rodriguez F, Mananes RP, Rojo-Manaute J, Gil P, Martinez-Gomiz JM, Vaquero-Martin J. 3D surgical printing and pre contoured plates for acetabular fractures. Injury. 2016;47:2507-2511.
  • Shuang F, Hu W, Shao Y, Li H, Zou H. Treatment of Intercondylar Humeral Fractures With 3D-Printed Osteosynthesis Plates. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e2461.
  • Chung KJ, Hong DY, Kim YT, Yang I, Park YW, Kim HN. Preshaping plates for minimally invasive fixation of calcaneal fractures using a real-size 3D-printed model as a preoperative and intraoperative tool. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:1231-1236.
  • Marcucci M, Indelli PF, Latella L, Poli P, King D. A multimodal approach in total hip arthroplasty preoperative templating. Skeletal Ra
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet