Políticas del conflicto en "El duelo", de Joseph Conrad
-
1
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
info
ISSN: 1130-5029, 2340-8995
Argitalpen urtea: 2020
Zenbakia: 40
Orrialdeak: 109-132
Mota: Artikulua
Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de humanidades
Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak
Laburpena
The present article tackles a new reading of Joseph Conrad’s novella "The Duel" (1908). The new approach construes the text as a revision of the politics of hegemony based on conflict –which defines present-day populism. After a thorough an analysis of the main rhetorical principle of the novella, the synecdoche warduel, the author outlines the ideological premises the text scrutinizes, to wit, the construction of an antagonist, i.e. an enemy within the limits of a dialectical space, the assertion of a state of exception as the main ground for the conflict, and the dynamics of re-signification as a means to keep the conflict going. Conrad’s text, as seen through Deleuze’s perspective, ultimately criticizes these politics of identity and in so doing uncovers a new space of thought, outside dialectics, whereby its systemic structure can be deconstructed.
Finantzaketari buruzko informazioa
El presente artículo ha sido producido y financiado en el marco del Grupo de Investigación “Contextos Literarios de la Modernidad” (Ref.: 941542) de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, dirigido por el Prof. D. Dámaso López García.Finantzatzaile
Erreferentzia bibliografikoak
- Agamben, Giorgio (2003). State of Exception. Trad. Kevin Atteil. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Baines, Jocelyn (1993 [1960]). Joseph Conrad. A Critical Biography. London: Weidenfield.
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2013 [1816-1830]). Sobre la Guerra. Trad. Celer Pawlowksky. Madrid: Tecnos.
- Conrad, Joseph (1925 [1905]). Autocracy and War. Notes on Life and Letters. London: John Grant, pp. 83-114.
- Conrad, Joseph (1904). Nostromo. London: John Grant.
- Conrad, Joseph (2009 [1908]). The Duel. The Nigger of the Narcissus and Other Stories. New York: Penguin, pp. 333-414.
- Deleuze, Gilles (2002 [1967]). Nietzsche y la filosofía. Trad. de Carmen Artal. Barcelona: Anagrama.
- Finchelstein, Federico (2017). From Fascism to Populism in History. Oakland: University of California Press.
- Jameson, Frederic (2002 [1981]). The Political Unconscious. Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.
- Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal (2014 [1985]). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York: Verso.
- Mouffe, Chantal (2018). For a Left Populism. London and New York: Verso.
- Nietzsche, Friedrich (2016). La genealogía de la moral. Obra completa, v. 4. Ed. Sánchez Meca. Madrid: Tecnos.
- Peters, John G. (2012). Conrad’s Literary Response to The First World War. College Literature: A Journal of Critical Literary Studies, vol. 39, n. 4, pp. 34-45.
- Scheipers, Sibylle (2018). On Small War: Carl von Clausewitz and People’s War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Schmitt, Carl (2005 [1932]). El concepto de lo político. Trad. Rafael Agapito. Madrid: Alianza.
- Stape, J. H. y John G. Peters (2015). Conrad’s “The Duel”: Sources / Texts. Leiden y Boston: Brill Rodopi.
- Stephen Brodsky, G. W. (2014). An Act Cruel and Absurd: Conrad’s Romantic Aesthetic and Realist Ethic. Conradiana. 46. n. 1-2, pp. 63-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cnd.2015.0001
- Taggart, Paul (2019). Populism and ‘unpolitics’. Populism and the Crisis of Democracy. Vol 1. Concepts and Theory. Ed. Gregor Fitzi, Jürgen MAckert y Bryan S. Turner. New York: Routledge, pp. 79-87.
- Urbinati, Nadia (2014). Democracy Disfigured. Opinion, Truth and the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Valls Oyarzun, Eduardo (2017). Dueños del tiempo y del espanto. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo.