Políticas del conflicto en El duelo, de Joseph Conrad

  1. Eduardo Valls Oyarzun 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revue:
Revista de humanidades

ISSN: 1130-5029 2340-8995

Année de publication: 2020

Número: 40

Pages: 109-132

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5944/RDH.40.2020.25472 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de humanidades

Résumé

Abstract: The present article tackles a new reading of Joseph Conrad’s novella The Duel (1908). The new approach construes the text as a revision of the politics of hegemony based on conflict —which defines present-day populism. After a thorough an analysis of the main rhetorical principle of the novella, the synecdoche war-duel, the author outlines the ideological premises the text scrutinizes, to wit, the construction of an antagonist, i.e. an enemy within the limits of a dialectical space, the assertion of a state of exception as the main ground for the conflict, and the dynamics of re-signification as a means to keep the conflict going. Conrad’s text, as seen through Deleuze’s perspective, ultimately criticizes these politics of identity and in so doing uncovers a new space of thought, outside dialectics, whereby its systemic structure can be deconstructed.

Information sur le financement

El presente artículo ha sido producido y financiado en el marco del Grupo de Investigación “Contextos Literarios de la Modernidad” (Ref.: 941542) de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, dirigido por el Prof. D. Dámaso López García.

Financeurs

Références bibliographiques

  • Agamben, Giorgio (2003). State of Exception. Trad. Kevin Atteil. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Baines, Jocelyn (1993 [1960]). Joseph Conrad. A Critical Biography. London: Weidenfield.
  • Clausewitz, Carl von (2013 [1816-1830]). Sobre la Guerra. Trad. Celer Pawlowksky. Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Conrad, Joseph (1925 [1905]). Autocracy and War. Notes on Life and Letters. London: John Grant, pp. 83-114.
  • Conrad, Joseph (1904). Nostromo. London: John Grant.
  • Conrad, Joseph (2009 [1908]). The Duel. The Nigger of the Narcissus and Other Stories. New York: Penguin, pp. 333-414.
  • Deleuze, Gilles (2002 [1967]). Nietzsche y la filosofía. Trad. de Carmen Artal. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  • Finchelstein, Federico (2017). From Fascism to Populism in History. Oakland: University of California Press.
  • Jameson, Frederic (2002 [1981]). The Political Unconscious. Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.
  • Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal (2014 [1985]). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York: Verso.
  • Mouffe, Chantal (2018). For a Left Populism. London and New York: Verso.
  • Nietzsche, Friedrich (2016). La genealogía de la moral. Obra completa, v. 4. Ed. Sánchez Meca. Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Peters, John G. (2012). Conrad’s Literary Response to The First World War. College Literature: A Journal of Critical Literary Studies, vol. 39, n. 4, pp. 34-45.
  • Scheipers, Sibylle (2018). On Small War: Carl von Clausewitz and People’s War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmitt, Carl (2005 [1932]). El concepto de lo político. Trad. Rafael Agapito. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Stape, J. H. y John G. Peters (2015). Conrad’s “The Duel”: Sources / Texts. Leiden y Boston: Brill Rodopi.
  • Stephen Brodsky, G. W. (2014). An Act Cruel and Absurd: Conrad’s Romantic Aesthetic and Realist Ethic. Conradiana. 46. n. 1-2, pp. 63-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cnd.2015.0001
  • Taggart, Paul (2019). Populism and ‘unpolitics’. Populism and the Crisis of Democracy. Vol 1. Concepts and Theory. Ed. Gregor Fitzi, Jürgen MAckert y Bryan S. Turner. New York: Routledge, pp. 79-87.
  • Urbinati, Nadia (2014). Democracy Disfigured. Opinion, Truth and the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Valls Oyarzun, Eduardo (2017). Dueños del tiempo y del espanto. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo.