Factores motivacionales intrínsecos en el uso de ePortfolios por el estudiantado en programas de Máster en Formación del Profesorado

  1. Ciesielkiewicz, Monika 1
  2. Méndez-Coca, David 2
  3. Méndez-Coca, Miriam 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

Revista:
Revista Electrónica Educare

ISSN: 1409-4258

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 25

Número: 2

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15359/REE.25-2.7 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Electrónica Educare

Resumen

En esta investigación nos hemos propuesto analizar los factores intrínsecos que podrían motivar al estudiantado a crear y utilizar un ePortfolio. Las personas participantes de nuestro estudio son estudiantes que cursaron el Máster en Formación del Profesorado en tres universidades diferentes. Para los fines de este estudio se ha utilizado una encuesta cuantitativa online administrada a través de los formularios de Google. La motivación intrínseca se midió por medio de una evaluación basada en el Test de motivación intrínseca (IMI). Este instrumento midió las siguientes dimensiones: la competencia percibida al realizar el ePortfolio, el esfuerzo invertido al realizar esta tarea, el valor o utilidad que le han dado a su realización y la presión o tensión sentida por el estudiantado cuando hizo esta actividad. Nuestros datos indican que los factores intrínsecos que más motivan al alumnado son la apreciación del valor y utilidad del ePortfolio, seguidos de la percepción de la competencia adquirida.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barberà Gregori, E. y de Martín Rojo, E. (2009). Portafolio electrónico: Aprender a evaluar el aprendizaje. Editorial OUC.
  • Basso-Aránguiz, M., Bravo-Molina, M., Castro-Riquelme, A. y Moraga-Contreras, C. (2018). Propuesta de modelo tecnológico para Flipped Classroom (T-FliC) en educación superior. Revista Electrónica Educare, 22(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.22-2.2
  • Birks, M., Hartin, P., Woods, C., Emmanuel, E., y Hitchins, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the use of eportfolios in nursing and midwifery education. Nurse education in practice, 18, 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.003
  • Bolliger, D. U. y Shepherd, C. E. (2010). Student perceptions of ePortfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31(3), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.513955
  • Chen, M.-Y., Chang, F. M.-T., Chen, C.-C., Huang, M.-J., y Chen, J.-W. (2012). Why do individuals use e-Portfolios? Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 114-125. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.4.114
  • Cheng, G. y Chau, J. (2013). Exploring the relationship between students’ self-regulated learning ability and their ePortfolio achievement. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.005
  • Ciesielkiewicz, M. (2015). El porfolio electrónico como recurso educativo y su impacto en la búsqueda de trabajo. Revista Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, 2, 83-99. https://www.revistasocitec.org/index.php/TCE/article/view/53
  • Ciesielkiewicz, M. (2019). Education for employability: The ePortfolio from school principals’ perspective. On the Horizon, 27(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-01-2019-0001
  • Ciesielkiewicz, M., Bonilla, C. F. y Santos Peñas, M. (2020). The acquisition of competences in transnational education through the ePortfolio. En Á. Herrero, C. Cambra, D. Urda, J. Sedano, H. Quintián y E. Corchado (Eds.), The 11th International Conference on EUropean Transnational Educational (ICEUTE 2020) (pp. 75-83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57799-5
  • Connect to Learning. (2019). About C2L. http://c2l.mcnrc.org/about/
  • Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A. y Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (create). Psychology and aging, 21(2), 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
  • Dahlstrom, E., Walker, J. D. y Dziuban, C. (2013). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology (Research Report). EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
  • Deci, E. L. y Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
  • Erice, D. y Ertaş, A. (2011). The impact of e-portfolio on foreign language writing skills. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(2), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001225
  • EUfolio (2020). EUfolio Partner Organizations. http://eufolio.eu/partners/
  • Eynon, B., y Gambino, L. M. (2017). High-impact ePortfolio practice: A catalyst for student, faculty, and institutional learning. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  • Hallam, G. y Creagh, T. (2010). ePortfolio use by university students in Australia: A review of the Australian ePortfolio Project. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903510582
  • Harring, K. y Luo, T. (2016). Eportfolios: Supporting Reflection and deep learning in high-impact practices. Peer Review: Association of American Colleges & Universities, 18(3). https://www.aacu.org/peerreview/2016/summer/Harring
  • Hart Research Associates (2013). It takes more than a major: Employer priorities for college learning and student success. Liberal Education, 99(2). https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2013_EmployerSurvey.pdf
  • Jenson, J. D. (2011). Promoting self-regulation and critical reflection Through writing students’ use of electronic portfolio. International Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 49-60. http://theijep.com/pdf/IJEP19.pdf
  • Kabilan, M. K. y Khan, M. A. (2012). Assessing pre-service English language teachers’ learning using e-portfolios: Benefits, challenges and competencies gained. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1007-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.011
  • Klampfer, A. y Köhler, T. (2015). Learners’ and teachers’ motivation toward using e-portfolios. An empirical investigation. International Journal Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 25(2), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2015.069867
  • McAuley, E., Duncan, T. y Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 60(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
  • Méndez, D. y Sota, J. (2017). La influencia del uso del tablet en la motivación en ciencias de los alumnos de primaria. Enseñanza de ciencias, extraordinario, 975-980. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Ensenanza/issue/view/25743
  • Mendez, D., Mendez, M. y Anguita, J. (2018). Motivation of 14-year-old students using tablets, compared to those using textbooks and workbooks. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 12(4), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i4.9203
  • Mobarhan, R., Rahman, A. A. y Majidi, M. (2015). Electronic portfolio motivational factors from students’ perspective: A qualitative study. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(2), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2015.07.017
  • Namlu, A. G. (2003). The effect of learning strategy on computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(5), 565-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00003-7
  • Redecker, C. (2013). The use of ICT for the assessment of key competences. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission Scientific and Policy Report. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/use-ict-assessment-key-competences
  • Wakimoto, D. K. y Lewis, R. E. (2014). Graduate student perceptions of eportfolios: Uses for reflection, development, and assessment. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.01.002
  • Welsh, M. (2012). Student perceptions of using the PebblePad e-portfolio system to support self-and peer-based formative assessment. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(1), 57-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.659884
  • Winne, P. H. y Hadwin, A. F. (2012). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 309-326). Routledge.
  • Zainal-Abidin, W., Uisimbekova, A. y Alias, R. A. (2011, November). Post-implementation strategy for the adoption of e-portfolio among students in a Malaysian public university. En 2011 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2011.6125670
  • Zellers, M. y Mudrey, R. (2007). Electronic portfolios and metacognition: A phenomenological examination of the implementation of e-Portfolios from the Instructors’ perspective. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(4), 419- 430
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet