Validez Estructural de una Versión Reducida del Cuestionario del Sueño de Mannheim

  1. Mar Mediano 1
  2. Jesús M. Alvarado 2
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Facultad de Psicología
  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Psicología
Revista:
Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica

ISSN: 1135-3848

Año de publicación: 2022

Título del ejemplar: Avances en Medición en Psicología

Volumen: 5

Número: 66

Páginas: 53-64

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.21865/RIDEP66.5.04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica

Resumen

El estudio del sueño y de los sueños es uno de los temas clásicos de la psicología clínica siendo una de las variables de interés la frecuencia con que se recuerdan. El cuestionario del sueño de Mannheim (MADRE, Mannheim Dream Questionnaire), es un instrumento de los más utilizados y está disponible en distintos idiomas. El presente estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar la validez estructural de una versión reducida en español (MADRE-RV). Mediante un análisis factorial confirmatorio se probaron cuatro modelos en una muestra de 357 participantes hispanohablantes universitarios: unidimensional, Bifactor clásico, Bifactor S-1 y multidimensional de cuatro factores. Los resultados ofrecieron el mejor ajuste para el modelo Bifactor S-1, con la variable latente recuerdo como factor general común a todos los ítems y las variables actitudes, emociones negativas y relación con la vigilia, como factores específicos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Asún, R. A., Rdz-Navarro, K., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Developing multidimensional Likert scales using item factor analysis: The case of four-point items. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(1), 109-133. https://doi:10.1177/0049124114566716
  • Aumann, C., Lahl, O., & Pietrowsky, R. (2012). Relationship between dream structure, boundary structure and the Big Five personality dimensions. Dreaming, 22(2), 124-135
  • Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, Second Edn. Guilford Publications.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16.
  • Dyck, S., Schredl, M., & Kühnel, A. (2017). Retest reliability study of the Mannheim Dream Questionnaire (MADRE). International Journal of Dream Research, 10(2), 173-176.
  • Eid, M., Geiser, C., Koch, T., & Heene, M. (2017). Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22, 541-562. https://doi:10.1037/met0000083
  • Ghorayeb, I., Napias, A., Denechere, E., & Mayo, W. (2019). Validation of the French version of the Mannheim. International Journal of Dream Research, 12(2), 23-34.
  • Godin, I., Montplaisir, J., & Nielsen, T. (2015). Dreaming and nightmares in REM sleep behavior disorder. Dreaming, 25(4), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/drm0000011
  • Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(3), 269-274.
  • Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66, 373-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294440
  • Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. En R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195-216). Scientific Software International.
  • Hobson, J. A., & Friston, K. J. (2012). Waking and dreaming consciousness: Neurobiological and functional considerations. Progress in Neurobiology, 98(1), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.003
  • Klepel. F., Schredl, M., & Göritz, A. (2019). Dreams stimulate waking-life creativity and problem solving: Effects of personality traits. International Journal of Dream Research, 12(1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.11588/ijodr.2019.1.58950
  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611-637. https://doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mediano, M., Montoro, P. R., Contreras, M. J., & Mayas, J. (2022). Assessment of a Spanish version of the Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE) in a young adult Spanish sample. International Journal of Dream Research, 15(2), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.11588/ijodr.2022.2.84172
  • Metzinger, T. (2013). Why are dreams interesting for philosophers? The example of minimal phenomenal selfhood, plus an agenda for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00746
  • Napias, A., Denechere, E., Mayo, W., & Ghorayeb, I. (2021). Assessment of dreamrelated aspects and beliefs in a large cohort of French students using a validated French version of the Mannheim Dream questionnaire. PLoS ONE 16(3): e0247506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal
  • Nielsen T. (2012). Variations in dream recall frequency and dream theme diversity by age and sex. Frontiers in neurology, 3, 106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00106
  • Ondé, D. (2020). A revision of the causality concept in the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 1(54), 103-117.
  • Ondé, D., Alvarado, J. M., Sastre, S., & Azañedo, C. M. (2021). Application of S-1 bifactor model to evaluate the structural validity of TMMS-24. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7427.
  • Otaiku, A. I. (2022). Distressing dreams and risk of Parkinson’s disease: A population-based cohort study. eClinicalMedicine, 101474. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/art icle/PIIS2589-5370(22)00204-8/fulltext#%20
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36.
  • Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.
  • Scapin, F., Dehon, H., & Englebert, J. (2018). Assessment of a French version of the Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE) in a Belgian sample. International Journal of Dream Research, 11(1), 46-53
  • Settineri, S., Frisone, F., Alibrandi, M., & Merlo, M. (2019). Italian adaptation of the Mannheim Dream Questionnaire. (MADRE): Age, gender and dream recall effects. International Journal of Dream Research, 12(1), 119-129.
  • Shahabian, M., Kargar, E., Ferdosi, N. S., Sorayani, F. J., Moghadam, S. A., & Rad, E. (2018). Validity, reliability and factor analysis the Persian adaption of Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE). International Journal of Dream Research, 11(2), 135-140.
  • Shahabian, M., Taghipour, A., Khademi, G., Ferdosi, N. S., Jahantiq, H., Salmani, E. R., & Ebadirad, M. (2017). Validity and reliability assessment of Persian adaption of Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE). International Journal of Dream Research, 10(1), 53-58.
  • Schredl, M., Berres. S., Klingauf, A., Schellhaas, S., & Göritz, A. (2014). The Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE): Retest reliability, age and gender effects. International Journal of Dream Research, 7(2). 141-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/ijodr.2014.2.16675
  • Schredl, M., Braband, M., Gödde, J., Kreicker, S., & Göritz, A. S. (2019). Dream recall frequency and attitude toward dreams: Stability over a 5-year period. Dreaming, 29(4), 303.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th Ed.). Routledge
  • Solomonova, E., & Carr, M. (2021). The role of attention and intention in dreams. Access and Mediation, 163.
  • Trizano-Hermosilla, I., Gálvez-Nieto, J. L., Alvarado, J. M., Saiz, J. L., & Salvo-Garrido, S. (2021). Reliability estimation in multidimensional scales: Comparing the bias of six estimators in measures with a bifactor structure. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fp syg.2021.508287
  • Vallat, R., Eichenlaub, J. B., Nicolas, A., & Ruby, P. (2018). Dream recall frequency is associated with medial prefrontal cortex white-matter density. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01856
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet