Proceso Formativo con la Herramienta Digital EVALOE-SSDValoración de Docentes de Educación Secundaria y Progreso en Lengua Oral en su Alumnado

  1. Marta Gràcia 1
  2. Jesús M. Alvarado 2
  3. Silvia Nieva 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Barcelona, Facultad de Psicología
  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Psicología
Revista:
Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica

ISSN: 1135-3848

Any de publicació: 2022

Títol de l'exemplar: Avances en Medición en Psicología

Volum: 5

Número: 66

Pàgines: 187-206

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.21865/RIDEP66.5.14 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

La EVALOE-SSD es una herramienta digital para promover la reflexión docente, mejorar su práctica, y contribuir al desarrollo de la competencia oral del alumnado. El objetivo es analizar la valoración que hacen los docentes del proceso formativo con EVALOE-SSD y de la reflexión colaborativa para mejorar su práctica en el aula y la competencia oral del alumnado. Participaron 6 docentes de diferentes asignaturas de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y sus respectivos grupos de alumnado. Los docentes utilizaron la EVALOE-SSD como instrumento de reflexión individual durante 6 meses, se reunieron virtualmente para reflexionar sobre su práctica docente, y participaron en un grupo de discusión. Los resultados muestran un progreso en cuanto a las habilidades docentes y la competencia oral del alumnado, y ponen de relieve una valoración positiva de su participación en el proceso formativo y de los encuentros reflexivos que han contribuido a mejorar la competencia oral de su alumnado.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teaching in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the CLASS-S. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492
  • Ametller, J. (2020). Dialogic education in science and mathematics. En N. Mercer, R. Wegerif and L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of research on Dialogic Education (547-558). Routledge International Handbooks.
  • Carhill-Poza, A., & Chen, J. (2020). Adolescent English learners’ language development in technology-enhanced classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 52-69. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44738
  • Chan, C. K. K., Tong, Y., & Aalst, J. V. (2020). Progressive dialogue in computer-supported colaborativo knowledge building. En N. Mercer, R. Wegerif and L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of research on Dialogic Education (469-484). Routledge International Handbooks.
  • Berson, Y., Halevy, N. Shamir, B., & Erez, M. (2015). Leading from different psychological distances: A construal-level perspective on vision communication, goal setting, and follower motivation. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2),143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.011
  • Brock, M., Wong, M. M. W., & Yu, B. (1993). Collaborative dairy keeping. En D. Freeman & Steve Cornwell (Eds.), New Ways in Teacher Education. TESOL Inc.
  • Chien, C. W. (2013). Analysis of a language teacher’s journal of classroom practice as reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 14(1), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.732951
  • Clarà, M., Mauri, M., Colomina, R. & Onrubia, J. (2019). Supporting collaborative reflection in teacher education: A case study. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1576626
  • Europaea, S. (2018). Key competences for lifelong learning in the european schools. Office of the Secretary-General of the European Schools, Pedagogical Development Unit.
  • Fàbregues, S., & Paré, M-H. (2016). El grupo de discusión. En S. Fàbregues, M. Meneses, D. Rodríguez-Gómez, & M. H. Paré, Técnicas de investigación social y educativa (159-192). UOC.
  • Farrell, T. (2022). Reflective practice in language teaching (Elements in Language Teaching). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009028783
  • Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.009
  • Gràcia, M., Alvarado, J. M., & Nieva, S. (2021) Assessment of oral skills in adolescents. Children, 8(12), 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121136
  • Gràcia, M., Alvarado, J. M., & Nieva, S. (2022a). Autoevaluación y toma de decisiones para mejorar la competencia oral en educación secundaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, – e Avaliação Psicológica, 62(1), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP62.1.07
  • Gràcia, M., Casanovas, J., Riba, C., Sancho, M. R., Jarque, M. J., Casanovas, J., & Vega, F. (2022b). Developing a digital application (EVALOE-DSS) for the professional development of teachers aiming to improve their students’ linguistic competence. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(3), 492-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1707690
  • Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J., Bell, C., Gitomer, D., & Pianta, R. (2015). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the classroom assessment scoring system–secondary. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5-6), 651680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614537117
  • Hill, H. C., Beisiegel, M., & Jacob, R. (2013). Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational Researcher, 42(9), 476-487. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13512674
  • Hrastinski, S. (2021).Teachers as developers of local evidence to improve digital course design. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 648-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1594959
  • Jurasaite-Harbison, E., & Rex, L. A. (2010). School cultures as contexts for informal teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.012
  • Mahmoudi, F., & Özkan, Y. (2015). Exploring experienced and novice teachers’ perceptions about professional development activities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.487
  • Major, L., Warwick, P., Rasmussen, I., Ludvigsen, S., & Cook, V. (2018). Classroom dialogue and digital technologies: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1995-2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9701-y
  • Millard, W., & Menzies, L. (2016) The State of Speaking in our Schools. Voice 21/LKMco.
  • Molinari, L., & Mameli, C. (2013). Process quality of classroom discourse: Pupil participation and learning opportunities. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 249 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.05.003
  • Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2020). Supporting reflection and reflective practice in an initial teacher education programme: An exploratory study, European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 502-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1793946
  • Murray, A. (2010). Empowering teachers through professional development. English Teaching Forum, 48(1), 2-11.
  • Newhouse, C. P., Lane, J. & Brown, C. (2007). Relecting on teaching practices using digital video representation in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2007v32n3.5.
  • Opfer, V. D., Pedder, D. G., & Lavicza, Z. (2011). The role of teachers’ orientation to learning in professional development and change: A national study of teachers in England. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.014
  • Prayogo, A., & Widyaningrum, L. (2019). WhatspApp-mediated language teachers’ reflection of classroom practice: Experience of Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 61-82.
  • Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/
  • Sedlacek, M., & Sedova, K. (2016). How many are talking? The role of collectivity in dialogic teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.001
  • Sedova (2017). A case study of a transition to dialogic teaching as a process of gradual change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 278-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.018
  • Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik,M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., & Salamounova, Z. (2019). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.10 1217
  • Smagorinsky, P., Shelton, S. A., & Moore, C. (2015). The role of reflexion in developing eupraxis in learning to teach English. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(4), 250-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1067146
  • Tan, A-L., & Tang, K. S. (2020). The role of dialogue in science epistemic practices. En N. Mercer, R. Wegerif and L. Major (Eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of research on Dialogic Education (527-529). Routledge International Handbooks.
  • Tsang, A. K. L. (2011). Online reflective group discusión-connecting first year undergraduate students with their third year peers. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 58-74.
  • Tortosa-Martínez, B. M., Pérez-Fuentes, M. C., & Molero Jurado, M. M. (2022). Investigación sobre el compromiso o engagement académico de los estudiantes: Una revisión sistemática sobre factores influyentes y instrumentos de evaluación. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica. 62(1), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP62.1.08
  • Turhan, B., & Kirkgöz, Y. (2021). A critical and collaborative stance towards retrospective reflection in language teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1917545
  • Wells, G. (2009). The meaning makers: Learning to talk and talking to learn (2nd edition). Multilingual Matters.
  • Witte, T. C. H., & Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2016). Students’ voice on literature teacher excellence. Towards a teacher-organised model of continuing professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.010
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet