Expulsar a un ciudadano de la UE por motivos distintos del orden, la seguridad y la salud públicosSentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Gran Sala)de 22 de junio de 2021, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Effets d’une décision d’éloignement),C-719/19

  1. Pablo González Saquero 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Journal:
Crítica penal y poder: una publicación del Observatorio del Sistema Penal y los Derechos Humanos

ISSN: 2014-3753

Year of publication: 2024

Issue: 26

Pages: 415-431

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Crítica penal y poder: una publicación del Observatorio del Sistema Penal y los Derechos Humanos

Abstract

The judgment under analysis deals for the first time with the effects of an expulsion orderadopted pursuant to Article 15 of Directive 2004/38. This provision regulates the expulsion of a Union citi-zen who, without posing a risk to public policy, public security, or public health, no longer has aright of residence that justified his presence in the host Member State. In FS, the court focuses on determining what circumstances must be present for an expulsion decision than has been issued against an EU citizen under Article 15 to be considered enforced; and when, therefore, such a citi-zen may return to the host Member State to take up a new legal residence. Thispaper also address-es two issues that the ECJ sidesteps in its judgment: the detention of an EU citizen for the purposes of expulsion; and the very legality of expulsion in the FScase. This last questionis particularly problematic, since the Court's silence seems to endorse an interpretation that, in the wake of Dano, would harden the conditions of residence of economically inactive citizens.

Bibliographic References

  • Comisión Europea (2009). Orientaciones para una mejor transposición y aplicación de la Directiva 2004/38/CE (Bruselas, 2.7.2009 COM(2009) 313 final).
  • Frisch, M., & Obschlager, W. (1990). Schweiz als Heimat?: Versuche über 50 Jahre. Suhrkamp.
  • Guild, E., Peers, S., & Tomkin, J. (2019). The EU Citizenship Directive: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.
  • Kramer, D. (2021). “On the Futility of Expelling Poor Union Citizens in an Open Border Europe,” European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 6(1), 155-165.
  • Neier, C. (2021). “New Clarifications on Ending the Union Citizen’s Right of Residence: The Grand Chamber Decisions of the European Court of Justice of 22 June 2021 in C-718/19 and C-719/19,” European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 6(2), 941-954.
  • Ristuccia, F. (2022). “«Cause tramps like us, baby we were born to run»: Untangling the effects of the expulsion of «undesired» Union citizens: Case C-719/19, FS v. Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Effets d’une décision d’éloignement), judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2021,” Common Market Law Review, 59(3), 889-914.
  • Shuibhne, N. N. (2024). EU Citizenship Law. Oxford University Press.
  • Szabados, T. (2017). “National Courts in the Frontline: Abuse of Rights under the Citizens’ Rights Directive,” Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 33(85), 84–102.
Data source: Dialnet